Local and non-local curvature approximation: a new asymptotic theory for wave scattering

Abstract We present a new asymptotic theory for scalar and vector wave scattering from rough surfaces which federates an extended Kirchhoff approximation (EKA), such as the integral equation method (IEM), with the first and second order small slope approximations (SSA). The new development stems from the fact that any improvement of the ‘high frequency’ Kirchhoff or tangent plane approximation (KA) must come through surface curvature and higher order derivatives. Hence, this condition requires that the second order kernel be quadratic in its lowest order with respect to its Fourier variable or formally the gradient operator. A second important constraint which must be met is that both the Kirchhoff approximation (KA) and the first order small perturbation method (SPM-1 or Bragg) be dynamically reached, depending on the surface conditions. We derive herein this new kernel from a formal inclusion of the derivative operator in the difference between the polarization coefficients of KA and SPM-1. This new kernel is as simple as the expressions for both Kirchhoff and SPM-1 coefficients. This formal difference has the same curvature order as SSA-1 + SSA-2. It is acknowledged that even though the second order small perturbation method (SPM-2) is not enforced, as opposed to the SSA, our model should reproduce a reasonable approximation of the SPM-2 function at least up to the curvature or quadratic order. We provide three different versions of this new asymptotic theory under the local, non-local, and weighted curvature approximations. Each of these three models is demonstrated to be tilt invariant through first order in the tilting vector.

[1]  Stephan Guignard,et al.  Analytical comparison between the surface current integral equation and the second-order small-slope approximation , 2003 .

[2]  D. Milder,et al.  An improved formalism for electromagnetic scattering from a perfectly conducting rough surface , 1996 .

[3]  Bertrand Chapron,et al.  A new bistatic model for electromagnetic scattering from perfectly conducting random surfaces , 1999 .

[4]  Jose Luis Alvarez-Perez An extension of the IEM/IEMM surface scattering model , 2001 .

[5]  Approximate representations of the scattering amplitude , 1991 .

[6]  R. Dashen,et al.  A new theory for scattering from a surface , 1991 .

[7]  Richard K. Moore,et al.  Radar remote sensing and surface scattering and emission theory , 1986 .

[8]  A. Fung Microwave Scattering and Emission Models and their Applications , 1994 .

[9]  A. Stogryn Electromagnetic Scattering From Rough, Finitely Conducting Surfaces , 1967 .

[10]  Phase factors representation for electromagnetic scattering from arough-surface perfect conductor , 2000 .

[11]  Dennis B. Creamer,et al.  Improved linear representation of ocean surface waves , 1989, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[12]  Stephan Guignard,et al.  A practical second-order electromagnetic model in the quasi-specular regime based on the curvature of a ‘good-conducting’ scattering surface , 2003 .

[13]  A. Voronovich,et al.  Non-local small-slope approximation for wave scattering from rough surfaces , 1996 .

[14]  D. Jackson,et al.  The validity of the perturbation approximation for rough surface scattering using a Gaussian roughness spectrum , 1988 .

[15]  A. Voronovich Small-slope approximation for electromagnetic wave scattering at a rough interface of two dielectric , 1994 .

[16]  Bertrand Chapron,et al.  A new bistatic model for electromagnetic scattering from perfectly conducting random surfaces: numerical evaluation and comparison with SPM , 2001 .

[17]  E. Thorsos The Validity of the Kirchhoff Approximation for Rough Surface Scattering Using a Gaussian Roughness Spectrum , 2004 .

[18]  A. Voronovich Wave Scattering from Rough Surfaces , 1994 .