Linking morphodynamics and directional persistence of T lymphocyte migration

T cells play a central role in the adaptive immune response, and their directed migration is essential for homing to sites of antigen presentation. Like neutrophils, T lymphocytes are rapidly moving cells that exhibit amoeboid movement, characterized by a definitive polarity with F-actin concentrated at the front and myosin II elsewhere. In this study, we used total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to monitor the cells' areas of contact with a surface presenting adhesive ICAM-1 and the chemokine, CXCL12/SDF-1. Our analysis reveals that T-cell migration and reorientation are achieved by bifurcation and lateral separation of protrusions along the leading membrane edge, followed by cessation of one of the protrusions, which acts as a pivot for cell turning. We show that the distribution of bifurcation frequencies exhibits characteristics of a random, spontaneous process; yet, the waiting time between bifurcation events depends on whether or not the pivot point remains on the same side of the migration axis. Our analysis further suggests that switching of the dominant protrusion between the two sides of the migration axis is associated with persistent migration, whereas the opposite is true of cell turning. To help explain the bifurcation phenomenon and how distinct migration behaviours might arise, a spatio-temporal, stochastic model describing F-actin dynamics is offered.

[1]  H. Meinhardt.  Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[2]  N. Hogg,et al.  The insider's guide to leukocyte integrin signalling and function , 2011, Nature Reviews Immunology.

[3]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Directional persistence of cell migration coincides with stability of asymmetric intracellular signaling. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[4]  R. Alon,et al.  The chemokine SDF-1 activates the integrins LFA-1, VLA-4, and VLA-5 on immature human CD34(+) cells: role in transendothelial/stromal migration and engraftment of NOD/SCID mice. , 2000, Blood.

[5]  R T Tranquillo,et al.  A stochastic model for leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis based on receptor binding fluctuations , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  Rajat Varma,et al.  Mechanisms for segregating T cell receptor and adhesion molecules during immunological synapse formation in Jurkat T cells , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  J. Cyster,et al.  Germinal center dark and light zone organization is mediated by CXCR4 and CXCR5 , 2004, Nature Immunology.

[8]  Sigurd B. Angenent,et al.  On the spontaneous emergence of cell polarity , 2008, Nature.

[9]  John A. Mackenzie,et al.  Chemotaxis: A Feedback-Based Computational Model Robustly Predicts Multiple Aspects of Real Cell Behaviour , 2011, PLoS biology.

[10]  Lisa M. Ebert,et al.  Lymphocyte traffic control by chemokines: follicular B helper T cells. , 2003, Immunology letters.

[11]  D. Irvine,et al.  Homeostatic Lymphoid Chemokines Synergize with Adhesion Ligands to Trigger T and B Lymphocyte Chemokinesis1 , 2006, The Journal of Immunology.

[12]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Navigating through models of chemotaxis. , 2008, Current opinion in cell biology.

[13]  Jun Allard,et al.  Traveling waves in actin dynamics and cell motility. , 2013, Current opinion in cell biology.

[14]  G. Danuser,et al.  Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[15]  Pablo A. Iglesias,et al.  Interaction of Motility, Directional Sensing, and Polarity Modules Recreates the Behaviors of Chemotaxing Cells , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[16]  J. Bear,et al.  New insights into the regulation and cellular functions of the ARP2/3 complex , 2012, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[17]  Pablo A Iglesias,et al.  Biased excitable networks: how cells direct motion in response to gradients. , 2012, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  E. Butcher,et al.  Chemokines in the systemic organization of immunity , 2003, Immunological reviews.

[19]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Membrane Tension Maintains Cell Polarity by Confining Signals to the Leading Edge during Neutrophil Migration , 2012, Cell.

[20]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[21]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  The Ordered Extension of Pseudopodia by Amoeboid Cells in the Absence of External Cues , 2009, PloS one.

[22]  Nadine Peyriéras,et al.  Inhibitory signalling to the Arp2/3 complex steers cell migration , 2013, Nature.

[23]  P. V. Haastert.  A Stochastic Model for Chemotaxis Based on the Ordered Extension of Pseudopods , 2010 .

[24]  D. Vavylonis,et al.  Excitable actin dynamics in lamellipodial protrusion and retraction. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[25]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Stochastic Dynamics of Membrane Protrusion Mediated by the DOCK180/Rac Pathway in Migrating Cells , 2010 .

[26]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Stochastic Model of Integrin-Mediated Signaling and Adhesion Dynamics at the Leading Edges of Migrating Cells , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[27]  Roger Brent,et al.  Detailed Simulations of Cell Biology with Smoldyn 2.1 , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[28]  M. Furie,et al.  The adhesion molecules used by monocytes for migration across endothelium include CD11a/CD18, CD11b/CD18, and VLA-4 on monocytes and ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and other ligands on endothelium. , 1995, Journal of immunology.

[29]  Jingsong Xu,et al.  Divergent Signals and Cytoskeletal Assemblies Regulate Self-Organizing Polarity in Neutrophils , 2003, Cell.

[30]  Natalie Andrew,et al.  Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[31]  M. Miyasaka,et al.  Constitutive Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Migration to the Splenic White Pulp Is Cooperatively Regulated by CCR7- and CXCR4-Mediated Signaling , 2012, The Journal of Immunology.

[32]  S. Kanner,et al.  Focal adhesion kinase regulates β1 integrin‐dependent T cell migration through an HEF1 effector pathway , 2001, European journal of immunology.

[33]  M H Gail,et al.  The locomotion of mouse fibroblasts in tissue culture. , 1970, Biophysical journal.

[34]  P. V. van Haastert,et al.  A stochastic model for chemotaxis based on the ordered extension of pseudopods. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[35]  Jason M Haugh,et al.  Directed migration of mesenchymal cells: where signaling and the cytoskeleton meet. , 2014, Current opinion in cell biology.

[36]  T. Meyer,et al.  A local coupling model and compass parameter for eukaryotic chemotaxis. , 2005, Developmental cell.

[37]  L Edelstein-Keshet,et al.  Regimes of wave type patterning driven by refractory actin feedback: transition from static polarization to dynamic wave behaviour , 2012, Physical biology.

[38]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Bidirectional coupling between integrin-mediated signaling and actomyosin mechanics explains matrix-dependent intermittency of leading-edge motility , 2013, Molecular biology of the cell.

[39]  Erik S. Welf,et al.  Migrating fibroblasts reorient directionality by a metastable, PI3K-dependent mechanism , 2012, The Journal of cell biology.

[40]  F. C. Bennett,et al.  Myosin-IIA and ICAM-1 Regulate the Interchange between Two Distinct Modes of T Cell Migration1 , 2009, The Journal of Immunology.

[41]  Joanna C. Porter,et al.  LFA-1-induced T cell migration on ICAM-1 involves regulation of MLCK-mediated attachment and ROCK-dependent detachment , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[42]  Wolfgang Losert,et al.  Cell Shape Dynamics: From Waves to Migration , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Lisa M. Ebert,et al.  Chemokine-mediated control of T cell traffic in lymphoid and peripheral tissues. , 2005, Molecular immunology.

[44]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Mathematical modeling of eukaryotic cell migration: insights beyond experiments. , 2013, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[45]  Jay X. Tang,et al.  Nonmuscle myosin heavy chain IIA mediates integrin LFA-1 de-adhesion during T lymphocyte migration , 2008, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[46]  Alexandra Jilkine,et al.  A Comparison of Mathematical Models for Polarization of Single Eukaryotic Cells in Response to Guided Cues , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..