Application of Adaptive Image Processing Technique to Real-Time Spatial Compound Ultrasound Imaging Improves Image Quality

Rationale and Objectives.To assess the impact of adaptive filter postprocessing on quality of ultrasound images. Methods.Ultrasound images acquired with real-time spatial compound imaging (SonoCT imaging) were subsequently processed with an adaptive real time algorithm (XRES imaging). Conventional and XRES-processed images from abdominal, pediatric or small parts ultrasound explorations were compared. The delineation of borders, tissue contrast, amount of noise, and overall image quality were evaluated. Results.Delineation of borders and tissue contrast were improved on all images (P < 0.05). The amount of noise was reduced (P < 0.05). The overall image quality was improved for abdominal, pediatric and small parts ultrasound explorations (P < 0.05). No image degradation was found. Conclusions.Adaptive processing provided better image quality without loss of clinically useful information.

[1]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  The Laplacian Pyramid as a Compact Image Code , 1983, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  J C Bamber,et al.  Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images. , 1986, Ultrasonics.

[3]  J C Bamber,et al.  Real-time implementation of coherent speckle suppression in B-scan images. , 1991, Ultrasonics.

[4]  T Loupas,et al.  Development of an advanced digital image processor for real-time speckle suppression in routine ultrasonic scanning. , 1994, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  J D Thomas,et al.  JPEG compression of digital echocardiographic images: impact on image quality. , 1995, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[6]  J. Weickert.  Foundations and applications of nonlinear anisotropic diffusion filtering , 1996 .

[7]  Albert Macovski,et al.  Lesion contrast enhancement in medical ultrasound imaging , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Efficient and reliable schemes for nonlinear diffusion filtering , 1998, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[9]  R. Shapiro,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging sonography: evaluation of image quality compared with conventional sonography. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  L. Hann,et al.  Hepatic sonography: comparison of tissue harmonic and standard sonography techniques. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[11]  S. K. Jespersen,et al.  In vitro spatial compound scanning for improved visualization of atherosclerosis. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[12]  Real-time Compound imaging: Verbesserte Erkennbarkeit von Punktionsnadeln und Markierungsdrähten gegenüber Single-line- Ultraschall? , 2001 .

[13]  S Sone,et al.  Effects of JPEG and wavelet compression of spiral low-dose ct images on detection of small lung cancers. , 2001, Acta radiologica.

[14]  B A Porter,et al.  Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. , 2001, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[15]  U Mödder,et al.  [Real-time compound imaging: improved visibility of puncture needles and localization wires as compared to single-line ultrasonography]. , 2001, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin.

[16]  M S Soo,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging sonography of breast lesions: improved margin analysis, conspicuity, and image quality compared to conventional ultrasound. , 2001, Clinical imaging.

[17]  S. Huber,et al.  Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. , 2002, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Michael Blaivas,et al.  Tissue harmonic imaging improves organ visualization in trauma ultrasound when compared with standard ultrasound mode. , 2002, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.