ADAPTIVE APPROACHES TO LICENSING, HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, AND INTRODUCTION OF DRUGS AND DEVICES

BACKGROUND Adaptive approaches to the introduction of drugs and medical devices involve the use of an evolving evidence base rather than conventional single-point-in-time evaluations as a proposed means to promote patient access to innovation, reduce clinical uncertainty, ensure effectiveness, and improve the health technology development process. METHODS This report summarizes a Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Policy Forum discussion, drawing on presentations from invited experts, discussions among attendees about real-world case examples, and background paper. RESULTS For adaptive approaches to be understood, accepted, and implemented, the Forum identified several key issues that must be addressed. These include the need to define the goals of and to set priorities for adaptive approaches; to examine evidence collection approaches; to clarify the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders; to understand the implications of adaptive approaches on current legal and ethical standards; to determine costs of such approaches and how they will be met; and to identify differences in applying adaptive approaches to drugs versus medical devices. The Forum also explored the different implications of adaptive approaches for various stakeholders, including patients, regulators, HTA/coverage bodies, health systems, clinicians, and industry. CONCLUSIONS A key outcome of the meeting was a clearer understanding of the opportunities and challenges adaptive approaches present. Furthermore, the Forum brought to light the critical importance of recognizing and including a full range of stakeholders as contributors to a shared decision-making model implicit in adaptive pathways in future discussions on, and implementation of, adaptive approaches.

[1]  Geoff Norman Commentary: Breaking the mold of normative clinical decision making: is it adaptive, suboptimal, or somewhere in between? , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[2]  Roberto Buzzetti,et al.  An overview of international literature from cystic fibrosis registries. Part 4: update 2011. , 2012, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.

[3]  Nancy A Dreyer,et al.  Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research. , 2010, Health affairs.

[4]  Panos Kanavos,et al.  Reference pricing for drugs: is it compatible with U.S. health care? , 2003, Health affairs.

[5]  M. Rawlins De testimonio: on the evidence for decisions about the use of therapeutic interventions , 2008, The Lancet.

[6]  H. Eichler,et al.  Adaptive Licensing: Taking the Next Step in the Evolution of Drug Approval , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[7]  Marianne Klemp,et al.  What principles should govern the use of managed entry agreements? , 2011, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[8]  Louis P Garrison,et al.  Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. , 2010, Health policy.

[9]  Katherine Payne,et al.  Challenges in the development and reimbursement of personalized medicine-payer and manufacturer perspectives and implications for health economics and outcomes research: a report of the ISPOR personalized medicine special interest group. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[10]  J. Woodcock,et al.  Evidence vs. Access: Can Twenty‐First‐Century Drug Regulation Refine the Tradeoffs? , 2012, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[11]  E. Moors,et al.  Conditional Approval and Approval Under Exceptional Circumstances as Regulatory Instruments for Stimulating Responsible Drug Innovation in Europe , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  Chris Henshall,et al.  USING HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT TO SUPPORT OPTIMAL USE OF TECHNOLOGIES IN CURRENT PRACTICE: THE CHALLENGE OF “DISINVESTMENT” , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[13]  Ernst R Berndt,et al.  Comparison of Stakeholder Metrics for Traditional and Adaptive Development and Licensing Approaches to Drug Development , 2013, Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science.

[14]  Shein-Chung Chow,et al.  Adaptive Design in Clinical Research: Issues, Opportunities, and Recommendations , 2006, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[15]  Harald Schmidt,et al.  Public engagement in health technology assessment and coverage decisions: a study of experiences in France, Germany, and the United Kingdom. , 2013, Journal of health politics, policy and law.

[16]  Karl Claxton,et al.  Coverage with evidence development, only in research, risk sharing, or patient access scheme? A framework for coverage decisions. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[17]  Martin Emmert,et al.  Effects of pay for performance in health care: a systematic review of systematic reviews. , 2013, Health policy.

[18]  Chris Henshall,et al.  HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, VALUE-BASED DECISION MAKING, AND INNOVATION , 2013, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  Katrine Frønsdal,et al.  Interactions between health technology assessment, coverage, and regulatory processes: Emerging issues, goals, and opportunities , 2011, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[20]  John Hutton,et al.  Harmonization of evidence requirements for health technology assessment in reimbursement decision making , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  Steven N Goodman,et al.  Ethical considerations in studying drug safety--the Institute of Medicine report. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  Joshua Shemer,et al.  Impact of new medical technologies on health expenditures in Israel 2000–07 , 2007, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[23]  Charalabos-Markos Dintsios,et al.  Reflections on the Changing Face of German Pharmaceutical Policy , 2011, PharmacoEconomics.

[24]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Harmonization of reimbursement and regulatory approval processes: a systematic review of international experiences , 2013, Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research.

[25]  Paul Miller,et al.  Role of pharmacoeconomic analysis in R&D decision making , 2005, PharmacoEconomics.

[26]  Roberto Buzzetti,et al.  An overview of international literature from cystic fibrosis registries 2. Neonatal screening and nutrition/growth. , 2010, Journal of cystic fibrosis : official journal of the European Cystic Fibrosis Society.