Similar migration for medial congruent and cruciate-retaining tibial components in an anatomic TKA system: a randomized controlled trial of 60 patients followed with RSA for 2 years

Background and purpose There is an ongoing debate regarding the appropriate level of constraint in primary TKA. To provide increased stability and better kinematics, more resembling a natural knee, a medial congruent (MC) tibial insert has been introduced. To investigate potential impact on implant migration, we evaluated the cemented Persona TKA, randomizing between MC and cruciate-retaining (CR) tibial designs. Patients and methods 60 patients with primary osteoarthritis were randomized to either the CR or MC tibial component. Radiostereometric analysis (RSA) examinations, evaluating translational and rotational migration as well as maximal total point motion (MTPM), were performed on the first postoperative day, at 3 months, and 1 and 2 years after surgery. Preoperative, and 1- and 2-year patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) data (KOOS and FJS) were collected. Results The mean tibial MTPM at 3 months were 0.48 mm (95% CI 0.37–0.58) and 0.56 mm (0.45–0.67) for the CR and MC respectively. 2 years postoperatively the respective values were 0.62 mm (0.50–0.73) and 0.73 mm (0.49–0.96). There was no statistically significant difference in migration between groups, for either the femoral or the tibial component, regarding x-, y-, and z-translations or rotations. Both CR and MC groups improved as expected in PROM scores pre- to postoperatively, but without a statistically significant difference between groups. There were no revisions or other serious adverse events related to surgery. Interpretation The results are promising, indicating good fixation for both designs, and this is in line with other well-performing TKAs on the market. The increased medial congruity of the MC inlay does not seem to affect the migration or the PROMs up to 2 years.

[1]  P. Indelli,et al.  Combining kinematic alignment and medial stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: Basic rationale and preliminary clinical evidences. , 2020, Journal of orthopaedics.

[2]  K. Doma,et al.  Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Medial Stabilized Versus Non-Medial Stabilized Prostheses in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Migration of a novel 3D-printed cementless versus a cemented total knee arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. , 2020, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  D. Backstein,et al.  Evaluation of the Medial Stabilized Knee Design Using Data From National Joint Registries and Current Literature. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  Sofie R French,et al.  A Single Surgeon Series Comparing the Outcomes of a Cruciate Retaining and Medially Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Kinematic Alignment Principles. , 2020, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  M. Teeter,et al.  A randomized controlled trial investigating the value of patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty in the Canadian healthcare system. , 2019, The bone & joint journal.

[7]  M. Dominkus,et al.  Patient reported outcomes and implant survivorship after Total knee arthroplasty with the persona knee implant system: two year follow up , 2019, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[8]  C. Bragdon,et al.  Promising early outcomes of a novel anatomic knee system , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  S. Crnalic,et al.  Uncemented or cemented femoral components work equally well in total knee arthroplasty , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[10]  J. Plevier,et al.  RSA migration of total knee replacements , 2018, Acta orthopaedica.

[11]  M. Roche,et al.  Effect of Obesity on Total Knee Arthroplasty Costs and Revision Rate , 2017, The Journal of Knee Surgery.

[12]  N. Hailer,et al.  Tibial component rotation around the transverse axis measured by radiostereometry predicts aseptic loosening better than maximal total point motion , 2017, Acta orthopaedica.

[13]  S. Papadakis,et al.  A long term clinical outcome of the Medial Pivot Knee Arthroplasty System. , 2017, The Knee.

[14]  Gwo-Chin Lee,et al.  Early Outcomes of Kinematic Alignment in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis of the Literature. , 2017, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[15]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  A randomized RSA study concentrating especially on continuous migration , 2016, Acta orthopaedica.

[16]  Marco Schiraldi,et al.  Mechanical and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty. , 2016, Annals of translational medicine.

[17]  Qinlei Huang,et al.  Hands-on Tutorial for Piecewise Linear Mixed-effects Models Using SAS® PROC MIXED , 2015 .

[18]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlon™ TKA: A prospective randomised RSA trial. , 2014, The Knee.

[19]  K. Sedacki,et al.  Mid- to long-term outcomes of a medial-pivot system for primary total knee replacement , 2014, Bone & joint research.

[20]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  The Knee Similar early migration when comparing CR and PS in Triathlon TM TKA : A prospective randomised RSA trial , 2014 .

[21]  M. Ritter,et al.  Preoperative malalignment increases risk of failure after total knee arthroplasty. , 2013, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[22]  J. Plevier,et al.  Early migration of tibial components is associated with late revision , 2012, Acta orthopaedica.

[23]  M. Kuster,et al.  The "forgotten joint" as the ultimate goal in joint arthroplasty: validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure. , 2012, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[24]  J. Plevier,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of 21,000 knee arthroplasties , 2012 .

[25]  Henrik Malchau,et al.  The stepwise introduction of innovation into orthopedic surgery: the next level of dilemmas. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  A. Davis,et al.  Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not? , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[27]  Robert A Siston,et al.  Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients. , 2008, Orthopedics.

[28]  H. Kehlet,et al.  High-dose local infiltration analgesia after hip and knee replacement—what is it, why does it work, and what are the future challenges? , 2007, Acta orthopaedica.

[29]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Removal or retention—will we ever know? The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[30]  Gunnar Flivik,et al.  Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (RSA) of implants , 2005, Acta orthopaedica.

[31]  J David Blaha,et al.  The rationale for a total knee implant that confers anteroposterior stability throughout range of motion. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[32]  R. Johnsson,et al.  Radiostereometric analysis in hip revision surgery-optimal time for index examination: 6 patients revised with impacted allografts and cement followed weekly for 6 weeks , 2000, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[33]  C. Ekdahl,et al.  Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) ‐ validation of a Swedish version , 1998, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[34]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis as a predictor of mechanical loosening of knee prostheses. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[35]  J. Kärrholm,et al.  Does early micromotion of femoral stem prostheses matter? 4-7-year stereoradiographic follow-up of 84 cemented prostheses. , 1994, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.