The effects of exposure and training on the perception of time-compressed speech in native versus nonnative listeners.

The present study investigated the effects of language experience on the perceptual learning induced by either brief exposure to or more intensive training with time-compressed speech. Native (n = 30) and nonnative (n = 30) listeners were each divided to three groups with different experiences with time-compressed speech: A trained group who trained on the semantic verification of time-compressed sentences for three sessions, an exposure group briefly exposed to 20 time-compressed sentences, and a group of naive listeners. Recognition was assessed with three sets of time-compressed sentences intended to evaluate exposure-induced and training-induced learning as well as across-token and across-talker generalization. Learning profiles differed between native and nonnative listeners. Exposure had a weaker effect in nonnative than in native listeners. Furthermore, native and nonnative trained listeners significantly outperformed their untrained counterparts when tested with sentences taken from the training set. However, only trained native listeners outperformed naive native listeners when tested with new sentences. These findings suggest that the perceptual learning of speech is sensitive to linguistic experience. That rapid learning is weaker in nonnative listeners is consistent with their difficulties in real-life conditions. Furthermore, nonnative listeners may require longer periods of practice to achieve native-like learning outcomes.

[1]  Yizhar Lavner,et al.  The effects of training length on the perceptual learning of time-compressed speech and its generalization. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Matthew H. Davis,et al.  Generalization of perceptual learning of vocoded speech. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  H. Levitt Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Sven L. Mattys,et al.  Effects of energetic and informational masking on speech segmentation by native and non-native speakers , 2010, Speech Commun..

[5]  S. Hochstein,et al.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[6]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Differential integration efforts of mandatory and optional sentence constituents. , 2006, Psychophysiology.

[8]  S Buus,et al.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[9]  Esther Janse,et al.  Perceptual learning of time-compressed and natural fast speech. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  A. Samuel,et al.  Perceptual learning for speech , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Matthew G. Wisniewski,et al.  Temporal dynamics in auditory perceptual learning: impact of sequencing and incidental learning. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Paula C. Stacey,et al.  Comparison of word-, sentence-, and phoneme-based training strategies in improving the perception of spectrally distorted speech. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[13]  B. Banks,et al.  Cognitive predictors of perceptual adaptation to accented speech. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  L. Conrad,et al.  The Effects of Time-Compressed Speech on Native and Efl Listening Comprehension , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[15]  Remarks on rhythmic stress in Modern Hebrew , 1982 .

[16]  P. Adank,et al.  Predicting foreign-accent adaptation in older adults , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  N. Kraus,et al.  Training to improve hearing speech in noise: biological mechanisms. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[18]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to sinewave-vocoded speech across languages. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  Mario A. Svirsky,et al.  Gradual adaptation to auditory frequency mismatch , 2015, Hearing Research.

[20]  Roger Griffiths,et al.  Speech Rate and NNS Comprehension: A Preliminary Study in Time‐Benefit Analysis* , 1990 .

[21]  Tessa Bent,et al.  The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Tessa Bent,et al.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech , 2008, Cognition.

[23]  J. Mehler,et al.  Adaptation to time-compressed speech: Phonological determinants , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Adaptation to spectrally-rotated speech. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Dissociations in perceptual learning revealed by adult age differences in adaptation to time-compressed speech. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Non-native speech perception in adverse conditions: A review , 2010, Speech Commun..

[27]  B. Wright,et al.  Accent-independent adaptation to foreign accented speech. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  T. Rietveld,et al.  Relationship between perceptual learning in speech and statistical learning in younger and older adults , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[29]  Ann R Bradlow,et al.  Semantic and phonetic enhancements for speech-in-noise recognition by native and non-native listeners. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Esther Janse,et al.  Word perception in fast speech: artificially time-compressed vs. naturally produced fast speech , 2004, Speech Commun..

[31]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[32]  J. Mehler,et al.  Perceptual adjustment to time-compressed speech: A cross-linguistic study , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[33]  Yizhar Lavner,et al.  Perceptual Learning of Time-Compressed Speech: More than Rapid Adaptation , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Effects of stimulus variability and adult aging on adaptation to time-compressed speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  K. D. Jong,et al.  Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody , 1999 .