Mobile phones, in combination with a computer locator system, improve the response times of emergency medical services in central London.

INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to determine whether mobile phones and mobile phone locating devices are associated with improved ambulance response times in central London. PATIENTS AND METHODS All calls from the London Ambulance Service database since 1999 were analysed. In addition, 100 consecutive patients completed a questionnaire on mobile phone use whilst attending the St Thomas's Hospital Emergency Department in central London. RESULTS Mobile phone use for emergencies in central London has increased from 4007 (5% of total) calls in January 1999 to 21,585 (29%) in August 2004. Ambulance response times for mobile phone calls were reduced after the introduction of the mobile phone locating system (mean 469 s versus 444 s; P = 0.0195). The proportion of mobile phone calls made from mobile phones for life-threatening emergencies was higher after injury than for medical emergencies (41% versus 16%, P = 0.0063). Of patients transported to the accident and emergency department by ambulance, 44% contacted the ambulance service by mobile phone. Three-quarters of calls made from outside the home or work-place were by mobile phone and 72% of patients indicated that it would have taken longer to contact the emergency services if they had not used a mobile. CONCLUSIONS Since the introduction of the mobile phone locating system, there has been an improvement in ambulance response times. Mobile locating systems in urban areas across the UK may lead to faster response times and, potentially, improved patient outcomes.

[1]  C. Hervé,et al.  Early medical care and mortality in polytrauma. , 1987, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  T. Marshall,et al.  Mobile phones and driving. , 2005, Journal of public health.

[3]  J M Violanti,et al.  Cellular phones and fatal traffic collisions. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  W. Dick Setting standards and implementing quality improvement in trauma care. , 1996, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[5]  Lennart Hardell,et al.  MOBILE TELEPHONES AND CANCER—A REVIEW OF EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE , 2004, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[6]  J. Nicholl,et al.  Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortality from major trauma: before and after study , 1997, BMJ.

[7]  J. Nicholl,et al.  Effects of London helicopter emergency medical service on survival after trauma , 1995, BMJ.

[8]  A. Kizilay,et al.  Effects of chronic exposure of electromagnetic fields from mobile phones on hearing in rats. , 2003, Auris, nasus, larynx.

[9]  S Chapman,et al.  Lifesavers and Samaritans: emergency use of cellular (mobile) phones in Australia. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.