Active DIsturbance Rejection Control of Surface Vessels Using Composite Error Updated Extended State Observer

In this paper, a composite-errors-based active disturbance rejection control law is proposed for surface vessels with exogeneous disturbances. The low-frequency disturbances from wind, wave and ocean currents are estimated by a novel composite-errors-based extended state observer (ESO). Since the composite errors are composed of trajectory tracking errors and estimation errors, the disturbance rejection control is feedforward-feedback composite control. The advantages of feedforward control and feedback control are exploited to reject system disturbances. Compared with conventional ESO-based active disturbance rejection control, smaller estimation errors and smaller tracking errors can be achieved by the proposed disturbance compensation control. The effectiveness and superiority of the designed control law are illustrated by theoretical analysis and simulation results.

[1]  Zongxia Jiao,et al.  Adaptive Robust Control of DC Motors With Extended State Observer , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[2]  Zhong-Ping Jiang,et al.  Global partial-state feedback and output-feedback tracking controllers for underactuated ships , 2005, Syst. Control. Lett..

[3]  Meng Joo Er,et al.  Composite adaptive fuzzy control for synchronizing generalized Lorenz systems. , 2012, Chaos.

[4]  Jingqing Han,et al.  From PID to Active Disturbance Rejection Control , 2009, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[5]  M. R. Katebi,et al.  H ∞ robust control design for dynamic ship positioning , 1997 .

[6]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Robust Adaptive Position Mooring Control for Marine Vessels , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[7]  Warren E. Dixon,et al.  Composite adaptation for neural network-based controllers , 2010, Proceedings of the 48h IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) held jointly with 2009 28th Chinese Control Conference.

[8]  Kristin Ytterstad Pettersen,et al.  Output Feedback Tracking of Ships , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[9]  Shuzhi Sam Ge,et al.  Adaptive Neural Network Control of a Fully Actuated Marine Surface Vessel With Multiple Output Constraints , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[10]  Sanjay E. Talole,et al.  Performance Analysis of Generalized Extended State Observer in Tackling Sinusoidal Disturbances , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[11]  Ajith Abraham,et al.  A Trajectory Tracking Robust Controller of Surface Vessels With Disturbance Uncertainties , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.

[12]  Roger Skjetne,et al.  Modeling, identification, and adaptive maneuvering of CyberShip II: A complete design with experiments , 2004 .

[13]  Satyandra K. Gupta,et al.  Target following with motion prediction for unmanned surface vehicle operating in cluttered environments , 2014, Auton. Robots.

[14]  Yi Guo,et al.  Global time-varying stabilization of underactuated surface vessel , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Zhiyong Chen,et al.  Output Regulation and Active Disturbance Rejection Control: Unified Formulation and Comparison , 2016 .

[16]  Wenchao Xue,et al.  Active disturbance rejection control: methodology and theoretical analysis. , 2014, ISA transactions.

[17]  Zhu Qidan,et al.  Sliding mode tracking control of an underactuated surface vessel , 2012 .

[18]  Kenneth R. Muske,et al.  Sliding-Mode Tracking Control of Surface Vessels , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[19]  Haoyong Yu,et al.  Composite Learning From Adaptive Dynamic Surface Control , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Yu Zhou,et al.  Composite adaptive fuzzy H∞ tracking control of uncertain nonlinear systems , 2013, Neurocomputing.

[21]  Haoyong Yu,et al.  Composite adaptive dynamic surface control using online recorded data , 2016 .