Dynamic Multiobjective Global Optimization of a Waste Water Treatment Plant for Nitrogen Removal

Abstract This paper deals with the dynamic optimization of a wastewater treatment plant model for nitrogen removal. Two process variables (i.e., aeration factor in a tank and internal recycle flow rate) are selected as control variables and their time profiles are approximated using the control vector parameterization (CVP) technique. Two conflicting objectives have been considered to formulate a multiobjective optimization problem, namely the quality of the effluent and the plant economy. To solve the multiobjective problem and find the Pareto front the epsilon -constraint technique has been considered. In order to solve this complex problem and to prove its multimodality, a multistart procedure and the scatter search metaheuristic have been applied, showing that the problem is indeed multimodal. Results reveal that this approach is successful to find optimal operation policies in this type of plants.

[1]  Benoît Chachuat,et al.  Dynamic optimisation of small size wastewater treatment plants including nitrification and denitrification processes , 2001 .

[2]  R. Sargent,et al.  Solution of a Class of Multistage Dynamic Optimization Problems. 2. Problems with Path Constraints , 1994 .

[3]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[4]  Jose A. Egea,et al.  Dynamic Optimization of Nonlinear Processes with an Enhanced Scatter Search Method , 2009 .

[5]  L. Lasdon,et al.  On a bicriterion formation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization , 1971 .

[6]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  The COST benchmark simulation model—current state and future perspective , 2004 .

[7]  Saziye Balku,et al.  Dynamics of an activated sludge process with nitrification and denitrification: Start-up simulation and optimization using evolutionary algorithm , 2006, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  D. Vries,et al.  Global Optimization for Integrated Design and Control of Computationally Expensive Process Models , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[9]  Sylvie Gillot,et al.  The COST Simulation Benchmark: Description and Simulator Manual , 2001 .

[10]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Robustness and economic measures as control benchmark performance criteria. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  I. Takács.  A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[12]  Carmen G. Moles,et al.  Integrated process design and control via global optimization: A wastewater treatment plant case study , 2001, 2001 European Control Conference (ECC).