Reframing Assistive Robots to Promote Successful Aging

We are living in an exciting time, as people are living longer, more active lives. This is reshaping how we think about aging. Rather than viewing aging as a problem to be fixed (i.e., a deficit model of aging), many aging researchers are viewing aging as a developmental stage of life to be celebrated and supported, that is, “successful aging.” In this article, we embrace this approach and consider it in the context of assistive robot design in an aim to steer the conversation away from deficit models that have limited robot design possibilities. To explore an alternative design approach to the study of aging in human-robot interaction (HRI), we invited five aging researchers (three geriatricians, one gerontologist, and one epidemiologist) and nine older adults to participate in our research. In the study, participants illustrated their interpretations of aging and suggested potential assistive robots. We found that while all participants perceived the importance of potential disabilities due to aging, they considered potential disabilities as only one aspect of the experience of aging. They highlighted other key themes to consider in designing robots to support successful aging, such as older adults’ autonomy and resilience. We discuss these findings for the HRI community and call for “robots for successful aging.”

[1]  Ipsit V Vahia,et al.  Association between older age and more successful aging: critical role of resilience and depression. , 2013, The American journal of psychiatry.

[2]  Masaaki Tanaka,et al.  Effect of a human-type communication robot on cognitive function in elderly women living alone , 2012, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[3]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Configuring participation: on how we involve people in design , 2013, CHI.

[4]  John R. Spletzer,et al.  A smart wheelchair ecosystem for autonomous navigation in urban environments , 2017, Auton. Robots.

[5]  Leila Takayama,et al.  Mobile remote presence systems for older adults: Acceptance, Benefits, and Concerns , 2011, 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  Steps Toward Participatory Design of Social Robots: Mutual Learning with Older Adults with Depression , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[7]  D. Jeste,et al.  Defining and assessing wisdom: a review of the literature. , 2013, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[8]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Assistive Robotics and an Ecology of Elders Living Independently in Their Homes , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Markus Vincze,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots for the Aging Population: Are We Trapped in Stereotypes? , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Care-O-bot® 3 - Vision of a Robot Butler , 2013, Your Virtual Butler.

[11]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Cultural design of domestic robots: A study of user expectations in Korea and the United States , 2012, 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[12]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Progress in developing a socially assistive mobile home robot companion for the elderly with mild cognitive impairment , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Zhiwei Luo,et al.  A Soft Human-Interactive Robot RI-MAN , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Identifying the Potential for Robotics to Assist Older Adults in Different Living Environments , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[15]  J. Kauffman,et al.  The social model of disability: dichotomy between impairment and disability. , 2013, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[16]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Weiser's dream in the Korean home: collaborative study of domestic roles, relationships, and ideal technologies , 2013, UbiComp.

[17]  L. Riek,et al.  Using robots to help people habituate to visible disabilities , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics.

[18]  B. Ford.  International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps , 1984, Releve epidemiologique hebdomadaire.

[19]  Ya-Huei Wu,et al.  Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. , 2012, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[20]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[21]  E. Palmore,et al.  Ageism: Negative and Positive , 1999 .

[22]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  The domesticated robot: Design guidelines for assisting older adults to age in place , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[23]  S. Katz.  Busy Bodies: Activity, aging, and the management of everyday life , 2000 .

[24]  Sebastian Glende,et al.  Increasing the Acceptance of Assistive Robots for Older People Through Marketing Strategies Based on Stakeholder Needs , 2016, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[25]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  That robot is not for me: Addressing stereotypes of aging in assistive robot design , 2016, 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[26]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[27]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[28]  Alex Mihailidis,et al.  Performance of daily activities by older adults with dementia: The role of an assistive robot , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[29]  P. Bidaud,et al.  Robot services for elderly with cognitive impairment: testing usability of graphical user interfaces. , 2013, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[30]  G. L. Engel,et al.  The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. , 1980, The American journal of psychiatry.

[31]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Making work visible , 1995, CACM.

[32]  Todd D. Nelson.  Ageism: Prejudice Against Our Feared Future Self , 2005 .

[33]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  The Emerging Policy and Ethics of Human Robot Interaction , 2015, HRI.

[34]  Antonis A. Argyros,et al.  Hobbit , a care robot supporting independent living at home : First prototype and lessons learned , 2015 .

[35]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  The influence of social presence on acceptance of a companion robot by older people , 2008 .

[36]  Herjan van den Heuvel,et al.  A Mixed-Method Approach to Evoke Creative and Holistic Thinking about Robots in a Home Environment , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[37]  G. Anderson,et al.  Population aging: a comparison among industrialized countries. , 2000, Health affairs.

[38]  Lawton Mp.  Aging and performance of home tasks. , 1990 .

[39]  P. McCallion,et al.  Healthcare Professional Training: A Comparison of Geriatric Competencies , 2008, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[40]  Vani M. Natarajan,et al.  Review of Feminist Technology, by Kate Boyer, Linda Layne, and Sharra Vostral , 2010 .

[41]  B. Ford.  International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. , 1984, The Medical journal of Australia.

[42]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Robotics Technology in Mental Health Care , 2015, ArXiv.

[43]  Horst-Michael Groß,et al.  Realization and user evaluation of a companion robot for people with mild cognitive impairments , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[44]  Ulrich Reiser,et al.  Let me Introduce Myself: I am Care-O-bot 4, a Gentleman Robot , 2015, MuC.

[45]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A hybrid control system for puppeteering a live robotic stage actor , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[46]  Louis Neven,et al.  'But obviously not for me': robots, laboratories and the defiant identity of elder test users. , 2010, Sociology of health & illness.

[47]  Sarah Lamb.  Permanent personhood or meaningful decline? Toward a critical anthropology of successful aging. , 2014, Journal of aging studies.

[48]  Ben Jelen,et al.  Evaluation of a Food Portion Size Estimation Interface for a Varying Literacy Population , 2016, CHI.

[49]  Jenay M. Beer,et al.  Older Adults’ Preferences for and Acceptance of Robot Assistance for Everyday Living Tasks , 2012, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ... Annual Meeting. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Annual Meeting.

[50]  C. Depp,et al.  Older adults' perspectives on successful aging: qualitative interviews. , 2010, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[51]  Ya-Huei Wu,et al.  The Attitudes and Perceptions of Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment Toward an Assistive Robot , 2016, Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society.

[52]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  A Critical Lens on Dementia and Design in HCI , 2017, CHI.

[53]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Older adults' medication management in the home: How can robots help? , 2013, 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[54]  D. Feil-Seifer,et al.  Defining socially assistive robotics , 2005, 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 2005. ICORR 2005..

[55]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Collaborative Map Making: A Reflexive Method for Understanding Matters of Concern in Design Research , 2017, CHI.

[56]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  How Humanlike Should a Social Robot Be: A User-Centered Exploration , 2016, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[57]  Andrew Steptoe,et al.  Loneliness, social isolation, and behavioral and biological health indicators in older adults. , 2011, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[58]  William W. Gaver,et al.  Design: Cultural probes , 1999, INTR.

[59]  Laurel D. Riek,et al.  Healthcare robotics , 2017, Commun. ACM.

[60]  R. Epstein,et al.  The Biopsychosocial Model 25 Years Later: Principles, Practice, and Scientific Inquiry , 2004, The Annals of Family Medicine.

[61]  G. L. Engel.  The clinical application of the biopsychosocial model. , 1980, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[62]  J. Broekens,et al.  Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review , 2009 .

[63]  P. Wood,et al.  The International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps of the World Health Organization , 1990 .

[64]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics] , 2007, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[65]  Rebecca E. Grinter,et al.  Health promotion as activism: building community capacity to effect social change , 2012, CHI.

[66]  R. Handler.  Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. George E. Marcus , Michael M. J. Fischer , 1986 .

[67]  Craig Whisker,et al.  Review: Adele E. Clarke, Carrie Friese & Rachel S. Washburn (2018). Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory After the Interpretive Turn , 2018 .

[68]  P. Flandorfer.  Population Ageing and Socially Assistive Robots for Elderly Persons: The Importance of Sociodemographic Factors for User Acceptance , 2012 .

[69]  C. Depp,et al.  Positive mental aging. , 2010, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[70]  L. Riek,et al.  A Code of Ethics for the Human-Robot Interaction Profession , 2014 .

[71]  Ben J. A. Kröse,et al.  Assessing Acceptance of Assistive Social Agent Technology by Older Adults: the Almere Model , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[72]  Richard Simpson,et al.  The smart wheelchair component system. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[73]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Stay on the boundary: artifact analysis exploring researcher and user framing of robot design , 2014, CHI.

[74]  D. Dunn,et al.  Person-first and identity-first language: Developing psychologists' cultural competence using disability language. , 2015, The American psychologist.

[75]  P. Marti,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics in the Treatment of Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[76]  M. Lawton.  Aging and Performance of Home Tasks , 1990, Human factors.