The primary stability of angle-stable versus conventional locked intramedullary nails

PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the initial biomechanical characteristics of the angle-stable locking system for intramedullary nails using the new biodegradable sleeve with conventional locking in the treatment of unstable distal tibial fractures.MethodsEight pairs of fresh, frozen porcine tibiae were used for this study. The expert tibial nail (Synthes) was equipped with either conventional locking screws (CL) or the angle-stable locking system (AS). This system consists of a special ASLS screw with a biodegradable sleeve. For this investigation distal tibias (5.5 cm) were used and the nails were locked with three screws in both groups. Biomechanical testing included non-destructive torsional and axial loading.ResultsThe AS group showed a significantly higher torsional stiffness (70%) compared to the CL group. The range of motion was 0.5 times smaller for the AS constructs. The neutral zone was eight times higher in the CL group (p < 0.001). In axial loading the AS group also showed a 10% higher axial stiffness and a 12% lower range of motion (p < 0.001).ConclusionThe angle-stable locking system (ASLS) using a special screw and sleeve locking for intramedullary nails provides a significantly higher primary stability. The differences determined in this study may have clinical relevance particularly for torsional loads. For the new biodegradable angle-stable sleeve we found a comparable stability to the PEEK-based sleeve system. This system has the potential to decrease complications such as secondary loss of reduction and mal-/non-union.

[1]  N P Haas,et al.  Angle stable locking reduces interfragmentary movements and promotes healing after unreamed nailing. Study of a displaced osteotomy model in sheep tibiae. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  Georg N Duda,et al.  Timely fracture-healing requires optimization of axial fixation stability. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  A. Bedi,et al.  Surgical Treatment of Nonarticular Distal Tibia Fractures , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[4]  J. Zammit,et al.  Intramedullary tibial nailing in distal third tibial fractures: distal locking screws and fracture non-union , 2008, International Orthopaedics.

[5]  P. Rommens,et al.  Extending the indications of intramedullary nailing with the Expert Tibial Nail. , 2008, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[6]  M. Bhandari,et al.  Treatment of Distal Tibia Fractures Without Articular Involvement: A Systematic Review of 1125 Fractures , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[7]  K Schwieger,et al.  Angle stable interlocking screws improve construct stability of intramedullary nailing of distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. , 2009, Injury.

[8]  E. Lambiris,et al.  Interlocking intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures. , 2000, Orthopedics.

[9]  K. Schwieger,et al.  Angular Stability Potentially Permits Fewer Locking Screws Compared With Conventional Locking in Intramedullary Nailed Distal Tibia Fractures: A Biomechanical Study , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  A. Kampen,et al.  Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail , 2007, International Orthopaedics.

[11]  Z. Florian,et al.  Biomechanical testing of spinal segment fixed by thoracolumbar spine locking plate on the swine lumbar spine. , 2010, Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czechoslovakia.

[12]  B. Colston,et al.  Regional variation in the mechanical properties of cortical bone from the porcine femur. , 2011, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  S. Stanzl-Tschegg,et al.  Micromotion at the fracture site after tibial nailing with four unreamed small-diameter nails--a biomechanical study using a distal tibia fracture model. , 2009, The Journal of trauma.

[14]  F K Fuss,et al.  Anatomy and function of the cruciate ligaments of the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domestica): a comparison with human cruciates. , 1991, Journal of anatomy.

[15]  N. Haas,et al.  Mechanische Grenzindikationen der unaufgebohrten Marknagelung , 2003, Der Unfallchirurg.

[16]  G. Im,et al.  Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation. , 2005, The Journal of trauma.

[17]  T. Zantop,et al.  Reducing the "killer turn" in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by fixation level and smoothing the tibial aperture. , 2007, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[18]  R. K. Beals,et al.  Malrotation after locked intramedullary tibial nailing: three case reports and review of the literature. , 2002, The Journal of trauma.

[19]  S. Lenschow,et al.  Structural properties of a new fixation strategy in double bundle ACL reconstruction: the MiniShim , 2011, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[20]  Gunter Spahn,et al.  Biomechanical investigation of different internal fixations in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[21]  H. Vallier,et al.  Radiographic and Clinical Comparisons of Distal Tibia Shaft Fractures (4 to 11 cm Proximal to the Plafond): Plating Versus Intramedullary Nailing , 2008, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[22]  K. Schwieger,et al.  Effect on dynamic mechanical stability and interfragmentary movement of angle-stable locking of intramedullary nails in unstable distal tibia fractures: a biomechanical study. , 2011, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  A. Bellelli,et al.  Bone mineral density of the proximal metaphysis of tibia: clinical relevance in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction , 2005, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  L. Claes,et al.  Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants , 1998, European Spine Journal.