Citation characterization and impact normalization in bioinformatics journals

Bioinformatics journals publish research findings of intellectual synergies among subfields such as biology, mathematics, and computer science. The objective of this study is to characterize the citation patterns in bioinformatics journals and their correspondent knowledge subfields. Our study analyzed bibliometric data (impact factor, cited-half-life, and references-per-article) of bioinformatics journals and their related subfields collected from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). The findings showed that bioinformatics journals' citations are field-dependent, with scattered patterns in article life span and citing propensity. Bioinformatics journals originally derived from biology-related subfields have shorter article life spans, more citing on average, and higher impact factors. Those journals, derived from mathematics and statistics, demonstrate converse citation patterns. Journal impact factors were normalized, taking into account the impacts of article life spans and citing propensity. A comparison of these normalized factors to JCR journal impact factors showed rearrangements in the ranking orders of a number of individual journals, but a high overall correlation with JCR impact factors. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Bernhard Mittermaier,et al.  Creation of journal-based publication profiles of scientific institutions — A methodology for the interdisciplinary comparison of scientific research based on the J-factor , 2009, Scientometrics.

[2]  Guang Yu,et al.  Reliability-based citation impact factor and the manipulation of impact factor , 2010, Scientometrics.

[3]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation context analysis and aging patterns of journal articles in molecular genetics , 1989, Scientometrics.

[4]  M. Tsay.  Library journal use and citation half-line in medical science , 1998 .

[5]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientistss: Brief Communication , 2006 .

[6]  María Jesús Mancebón-Torrubia,et al.  The evaluation of scientific production: Towards a neutral impact factor , 2009, Scientometrics.

[7]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[8]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Aging, obsolescence, impact, growth, and utilization: definitions and relations , 2000 .

[9]  Andreas Strotmann,et al.  Counting first, last, or all authors in citation analysis: A comprehensive comparison in the highly collaborative stem cell research field , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  B. K. Sen.  Normalised Impact factor , 1992, J. Documentation.

[11]  Ian Rowlands,et al.  Revisiting 'obsolescence' and journal article 'decay' through usage data: an analysis of digital journal use by year of publication , 2005, Inf. Process. Manag..

[12]  Glenn D. Walters,et al.  The citation life cycle of articles published in 13 American Psychological Association journals: A 25-year longitudinal analysis , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[13]  Stephen J. Bensman,et al.  Mean citation rate per article in mathematics journals: Differences from the scientific model , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Subfield problems in applying the Garfield (Impact) Factors in practice , 2002, Scientometrics.

[15]  Ying Ding,et al.  Weighted citation: An indicator of an article's prestige , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  Cecelia M. Brown.  The changing face of scientific discourse: Analysis of genomic and proteomic database usage and acceptance , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  E. Garfield.  Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[18]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A comparative analysis of publication activity and citation impact based on the core literature in bioinformatics , 2009, Scientometrics.

[19]  Sally Jo Cunningham.  An empirical investigation of the obsolescence rate for information systems literature , 1995 .

[20]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[21]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[22]  Way Kuo,et al.  R-Impact: Reliability-Based Citation Impact Factor , 2007, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[23]  Ming-Yueh Tsay,et al.  Library Journal Use and Citation Half-Life in Medical Science , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[24]  Senator Jeong,et al.  Are you an invited speaker? A bibliometric analysis of elite groups for scholarly events in bioinformatics , 2009 .

[25]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[26]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Citation analysis of scientific journals and journal impact measures , 2005 .

[27]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations - I. A comparison of methods , 1985, Scientometrics.

[28]  R. Drmanac.  The advent of personal genome sequencing , 2011, Genetics in Medicine.

[29]  Wiley Interscience.  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology , 2013 .

[30]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[31]  Swapan Kumar Patra,et al.  Bibliometric study of bioinformatics literature , 2006, Scientometrics.

[32]  Lokman I. Meho,et al.  Using the h-index to rank influential information scientists , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[33]  J. Marton,et al.  Obsolescence or immediacy? Evidence supporting Price's hypothesis , 1985, Scientometrics.

[34]  Mohammad Hossein Biglu,et al.  The influence of references per paper in the SCI to Impact Factors and the Matthew Effect , 2007, Scientometrics.

[35]  Danny P. Wallace.  The relationship between journal productivity and obsolescence , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[36]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Reference standards for citation based assessments , 2005, Scientometrics.

[37]  W. John MacMullen,et al.  Information problems in molecular biology and bioinformatics: Research Articles , 2005 .

[38]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Rank-normalized impact factor: A way to compare journal performance across subject categories , 2005, ASIST.

[39]  W. John MacMullen,et al.  Information problems in molecular biology and bioinformatics , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature , 2011, J. Informetrics.

[41]  Leo Egghe,et al.  The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature , 2000 .

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  of Science , 2022 .

[43]  Jan W. Buzydlowski,et al.  Real-time author co-citation mapping for online searching , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..

[44]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  Subfield-specific normalized relative indicators and a new generation of relational charts: Methodological foundations illustrated on the assessment of institutional research performance , 2008, Scientometrics.

[45]  Umut Al,et al.  Scatter and obsolescence of journals cited in theses and dissertations of librarianship , 2006 .

[46]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Clustering thescience citation index® using co-citations , 1985, Scientometrics.

[47]  Anastassios Pouris,et al.  A bibliometric study of bioinformatics research in South Africa , 2007, Scientometrics.

[48]  E. Garfield.  Use of Journal Citation Reports and Journal Performance Indicators in measuring short and long term journal impact. , 2000, Croatian medical journal.

[49]  Irina Marshakova-Shaik Evich.  THE STANDARD IMPACT FACTOR AS AN EVALUATION TOOL OF SCIENCE FIELDS AND SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS , 1996 .

[50]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Long-term variations in the aging of scientific literature: From exponential growth to steady-state science (1900-2004) , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Xia Gao,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics , 2008, Scientometrics.

[52]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Modifying the journal impact factor by fractional citation weighting: The audience factor , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Bibliometric Study of Reference Literature in the Sciences and Social Sciences , 1999, Inf. Process. Manag..

[54]  Aurel Avramescu,et al.  Actuality and Obsolescence of Scientific Literature , 2007, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[55]  N. Mohaghegh,et al.  WHY THE IMPACT FACTOR OF JOURNALS SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR EVALUATING RESEARCH , 2005 .

[56]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A systematic analysis of Hirsch-type indices for journals , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[57]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Relationships between the rate of scientific development and citations. The chance for citedness model , 1996, Scientometrics.

[58]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field- and time-dependent factors to be considered , 1985, Scientometrics.

[59]  E GARFIELD,et al.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. , 2006, Science.

[60]  Herbert S. White,et al.  Citation-based auditing of academic performance , 1994 .

[61]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes , 2004, Scientometrics.

[62]  Pedro Albarrán,et al.  References made and citations received by scientific articles , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..