Workflow of Ultrasound-Guided Arterial Access.

Arterial line cannulations frequently are performed in various clinical settings to facilitate hemodynamic monitoring and metabolic assessments. Palpation-guided technique generally is performed due to the superficial nature of the peripheral arteries; however, this approach may be challenging in patients with obesity, edema, and hypotension. Difficult line placements are a significant contributor of reduced operating room efficiency due to time delays seen in procedural workflow. Real-time ultrasound guidance is shown to improve success rates of arterial cannulation and reduction in multiple attempts, leading to time efficiency and less likelihood of arterial spasms or hematoma formation. In this report, the authors demonstrate the workflow of ultrasound-guided arterial line cannulation, outline the features of their institutional multi-modal training project for quality improvement, and evaluate the possible effect of the initiative on surgical delays seen with difficult line placements.

[1]  Fares Alahdab,et al.  Ultrasound‐guided versus palpation‐guided radial artery catheterization in adult population: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2018, American heart journal.

[2]  D. Baidya,et al.  Comparison between ultrasound guided technique and digital palpation technique for radial artery cannulation in adult patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2018, Journal of clinical anesthesia.

[3]  M. Fusco,et al.  Comparison of a pressure-sensing sheath and radial arterial line for intraoperative blood pressure monitoring in neurointerventional procedures , 2018, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery.

[4]  E. Sloth,et al.  Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterisation increases the success rate among anaesthesiology residents: a randomised study. , 2017, The journal of vascular access.

[5]  Guizhen Fang,et al.  Ultrasonic Technology Improves Radial Artery Puncture and Cannulation in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Shock Patients , 2016, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[6]  S. Tangwiwat,et al.  Comparing the Success Rate of Radial Artery Cannulation under Ultrasound Guidance and Palpation Technique in Adults. , 2016, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet.

[7]  D. Schroeder,et al.  Surgical and Patient Risk Factors for Severe Arterial Line Complications in Adults , 2016, Anesthesiology.

[8]  Travis Healey,et al.  Improving Operating Room Efficiency, Part 2: Intraoperative and Postoperative Strategies , 2015, JBJS reviews.

[9]  E. Bayman,et al.  A randomised controlled trial of radial artery cannulation guided by Doppler vs palpation vs ultrasound , 2015, Anaesthesia.

[10]  S. Schwarz,et al.  Ultrasound guidance versus direct palpation for radial artery catheterization by expert operators: a randomized trial among Canadian cardiac anesthesiologists , 2015, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[11]  C. Laursen,et al.  Ultrasonographically Guided Puncture of the Radial Artery for Blood Gas Analysis: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. , 2015, Annals of emergency medicine.

[12]  M. Kern,et al.  Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). , 2015, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[13]  Liang Zhao,et al.  Ultrasound Guidance for Radial Artery Catheterization: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials , 2014, PloS one.

[14]  M. Tian,et al.  Modified Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Ultrasound Versus Conventional Long-Axis In-Plane Ultrasound to Guide Radial Artery Cannulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[15]  John C. O’Horo,et al.  Arterial Catheters as a Source of Bloodstream Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis* , 2014, Critical care medicine.

[16]  Xian-Tao Zeng,et al.  Efficacy of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials , 2014, Critical Care.

[17]  E. Sloth,et al.  Ultrasonography‐guided radial artery catheterization is superior compared with the traditional palpation technique , 2014, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[18]  M. Schernthaner,et al.  Prospective comparison of palpation versus ultrasound-guided radial access for cardiac catheterization. , 2013, The Journal of invasive cardiology.

[19]  P. Claret,et al.  Ultrasound guidance for radial arterial puncture: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[20]  L. Eisen,et al.  Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2011, Chest.

[21]  M. Blaivas,et al.  A prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial arterial catheters. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[22]  P. Levin,et al.  Use of ultrasound guidance in the insertion of radial artery catheters , 2003, Critical care medicine.

[23]  Azriel Perel,et al.  Clinical review: Complications and risk factors of peripheral arterial catheters used for haemodynamic monitoring in anaesthesia and intensive care medicine , 2002, Critical care.

[24]  A. Jackson,et al.  A comparison of arterial lines and insertion techniques in critically ill patients , 1994, Anaesthesia.

[25]  K. Ueda,et al.  Ultrasound-Guided Dynamic Needle Tip Positioning Technique Versus Palpation Technique for Radial Arterial Cannulation in Adult Surgical Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2018, Anesthesia and analgesia.