Evaluation of Three Methods Proposed for the Computation of Inter-TSO Payments in the Internal Electricity Market of the European Union

Parties to the Internal Electricity Market of the European Union (IEM) decided in 2001 to abolish the method of pancaking of transmission tariffs for cross-border transactions that was originally in place. Instead, they have agreed to implement a system whereby national transmission tariffs provide access to the entire IEM. This system is supplemented by a scheme of inter-TSO payments. However, conflict may arise if the compensation that a country must pay another one is not in accordance with the electrical usage that the former is making of the grid of the latter. For instance, Inter TSO Compensation methods (ITC methods) implicitly allocate the cost of any existing or new transmission line. Therefore, the adoption of an inefficient method may be an obstacle for building some needed regional grid investments. Consequently, one should give careful consideration to the selection of the ITC method. This paper analyzes, both qualitatively and quantitatively, the implementation of the most relevant ITC methods that have been considered so far in the European debate. When assessing each method from a conceptual point of view, considerable attention is devoted to the critical examination of its main underlying assumptions.

[1]  F. Schweppe Spot Pricing of Electricity , 1988 .

[2]  F.D. Galiana,et al.  Multiarea transmission network cost allocation , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  A. Piperno,et al.  2003 , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[4]  I. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Marginal pricing of transmission services: a comparative analysis of network cost allocation methods , 2000 .

[5]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Contributions of individual generators to loads and flows , 1997 .

[6]  M. Pereira,et al.  An Aumann-Shapley Approach to Allocate Transmission Service Cost Among Network Users in Electricity Markets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Proportional sharing assumption in tracing methodology , 2004 .

[8]  I. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Marginal pricing of transmission services: an analysis of cost recovery , 1995 .

[9]  Ignacio J. P rez-Arriaga Marginal Pricing of Transmission Services: A Comparative Analysis of Network Cost Allocation Methods , 2000 .

[10]  P H Tardieu,et al.  A EUROPEAN VIEW. ENERGY EFFICIENCY IN LAND TRANSPORT. PROCEEDINGS OF A SEMINAR ORGANISED BY THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR ENERGY, LUXEMBOURG, MAY 16-18, 1988 , 1989 .

[11]  Antonio J. Conejo,et al.  Transmission network cost allocation based on equivalent bilateral exchanges , 2003 .

[12]  Ignacio J. Pérez-Arriaga,et al.  Computation and decomposition of spot prices for transmission pricing , 1993 .

[13]  Janusz Bialek,et al.  Tracing the flow of electricity , 1996 .

[14]  Luis Olmos Camacho,et al.  On the choice of the slack bus in mechanisms for transmission network cost allocation that are based on network utilization , 2002 .