Impact of the Uncertainty of Distributed Renewable Generation on Deregulated Electricity Supply Chain

Active districts are districts that have a system in place to coordinate distributed energy generation and external grid to meet the local energy demand. They are now widely recognized as a clear opportunity toward distributed renewable integration. Despite apparent benefits of incorporating renewable sources in an active district, uncertainty in renewable generation can impose unprecedented challenges in efficient operation of the existing deregulated electricity supply chain, which is designed to operate with no or little uncertainty in both supply and demand. While most previous studies focused on the impact of renewables on the supply side of the supply chain, we investigate the impact of distributed renewable generation on the demand side. In particular, we study how the uncertainty from distributed renewable generation in an active district affects the average buying cost of utilities and the cost-saving of the active district. Our analysis shows that the renewable uncertainty in an active district can: 1) increase the average buying cost of the utility serving the active district, termed as local impact and 2) somewhat surprisingly, reduce the average buying cost of other utilities participating in the same electricity market, termed as global impact. Moreover, the local impact will lead to an increase in the electricity retail price of active district, resulting in a cost-saving less than the case without renewable uncertainty. These observations reveal an inherent economic incentive for utilities to improve their load forecasting accuracy, in order to avoid economy loss and even extract economic benefit in the electricity market. We verify our theoretical results by extensive experiments using real-world traces. Our experimental results show that a 9% increase in load forecasting error (modeled by the standard deviation of the mismatch between real-time actual demand and day-ahead purchased supply) will increase the average buying cost of the utility by 10%.

[1]  Adam Wierman,et al.  Energy procurement strategies in the presence of intermittent sources , 2014, SIGMETRICS '14.

[2]  王德伦 英语-翻译-Internet , 2000 .

[3]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Online energy generation scheduling for microgrids with intermittent energy sources and co-generation , 2012, SIGMETRICS '13.

[4]  Minghua Chen,et al.  Online microgrid energy generation scheduling revisited: the benefits of randomization and interval prediction , 2016, e-Energy.

[5]  Chris Marnay,et al.  Microgrids: An emerging paradigm for meeting building electricity and heat requirements efficiently and with appropriate energy quality , 2007 .

[6]  R. Sioshansi Evaluating the Impacts of Real-Time Pricing on the Cost and Value of Wind Generation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  P. Varaiya,et al.  Bringing Wind Energy to Market , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Fundamentals of power system economics , 1991 .

[9]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Impact of the Uncertainty of Distributed Renewable Generation on Deregulated Electricity Supply Chain , 2018, 2018 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM).

[10]  Howard B. Demuth,et al.  Neutral network toolbox for use with Matlab , 1995 .

[11]  Stein-Erik Fleten,et al.  Constructing bidding curves for a price-taking retailer in the norwegian electricity market , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[12]  Pravin Varaiya,et al.  Risk limiting dispatch of wind power , 2012, 2012 American Control Conference (ACC).

[13]  Bo Thiesson,et al.  Evaluating the Value of Flexibility in Energy Regulation Markets , 2015, e-Energy.

[14]  Mike Sandiford,et al.  Retrospective modeling of the merit-order effect on wholesale electricity prices from distributed photovoltaic generation in the Australian National Electricity Market , 2013 .

[15]  Qi Zhu,et al.  Peak-Aware Online Economic Dispatching for Microgrids , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[16]  Klaus Skytte,et al.  The regulating power market on the Nordic power exchange Nord Pool: an econometric analysis , 1999 .

[17]  K. M. Chandy,et al.  Impact of residential PV adoption on Retail Electricity Rates , 2013 .

[18]  Tong Wang,et al.  A Multiordering Newsvendor Model with Dynamic Forecast Evolution , 2012, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[19]  A. Llombart,et al.  Statistical Analysis of Wind Power Forecast Error , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  Lang Tong,et al.  Renewables and Storage in Distribution Systems: Centralized vs. Decentralized Integration , 2016, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.