The Impacts of Environmental Tax in China: A Dynamic Recursive Multi-Sector CGE Model

In recent years, the accumulated environmental problems resulting from excessive usage of fossil fuels have gradually loomed. Thus, an environmental tax, as an important policy tool, has been put on the agenda in China. In this paper, a dynamic recursive multi-sector Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model is applied to explore the impacts of the environmental tax on China’s economy. To comprehensively analyze the impacts, we introduce four kinds of typical contaminants and set two kinds of scenarios: different tax rates and different tax refunds. The results show that the environmental tax is conducive to environmental improvement, but the economic variables are adversely affected, for example, the loss of GDP at the low level tax rate is 0.46%. In order to offset the negative impacts, we presume the government refunds the tax. The results show that this can indeed relieve the negative effects. When the government refunds the production tax and corporate income tax, 0.49% and 0.34% of GDP is relieved by respectively. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the implementation of the environmental tax in China and lays a solid foundation for the introduction of the environmental tax.

[1]  Minjun Shi,et al.  Impacts of Carbon Tax Policy on CO2 Mitigation and Economic Growth in China , 2011 .

[2]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Will export rebate policy be effective for CO2 emissions reduction in China? A CEEPA-based analysis , 2015 .

[3]  Yu Liu,et al.  The Economic impact of different carbon tax revenue recycling schemes in China: A model-based scenario analysis ☆ , 2015 .

[4]  Xingping Zhang,et al.  Exploring the impacts of a carbon tax on the Chinese economy using a CGE model with a detailed disaggregation of energy sectors , 2014 .

[5]  Rainer Sauerborn,et al.  Climate change and health: on the latest IPCC report , 2014, The Lancet.

[6]  Jason F. Shogren,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics 3-Volume Set , 2013 .

[7]  Bin Zhao,et al.  Spatiotemporal variations of PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations between 31 Chinese cities and their relationships with SO2, NO2, CO and O3 , 2015 .

[8]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Carbon taxation policy in China: How to protect energy- and trade-intensive sectors? , 2007 .

[9]  Michael Jefferson IPCC fifth assessment synthesis report: “Climate change 2014: Longer report”: Critical analysis , 2015 .

[10]  R Stalnikowicz-Darvasi,et al.  Gastrointestinal bleeding during low-dose aspirin administration for prevention of arterial occlusive events. A critical analysis. , 1995, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[11]  Johan Springael,et al.  Simulation with system dynamics and fuzzy reasoning of a tax policy to reduce CO2 emissions in the residential sector , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Han Qiao,et al.  Impacts of Border Carbon Adjustments on China's Sectoral Emissions: Simulations with a Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium Model , 2012 .

[13]  Yan Xu,et al.  Local air pollutant emission reduction and ancillary carbon benefits of SO2 control policies: Application of AIM/CGE model to China , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[14]  Cutler J. Cleveland,et al.  Encyclopedia of Energy , 2004 .

[15]  P. Rogers,et al.  Leontief's “Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure…” Revisited: A General Equilibrium Formulation , 2010 .

[16]  Tao Wang,et al.  Addressing the competitiveness effects of taxing carbon in China: domestic tax cuts versus border tax adjustments , 2016 .

[17]  Kazuhiro Ueta,et al.  An economic and environmental assessment of future electricity generation mixes in Japan – an assessment using the E3MG macro-econometric model , 2014 .

[18]  Yongxiu He,et al.  Low-carbon-oriented dynamic optimization of residential energy pricing in China , 2014 .