An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan

Abstract Evaluating the effectiveness of public participation in EIA related decisions is of crucial importance for developing a better understanding of overall EIA effectiveness. This paper aims to contribute to the professional debate by establishing a country specific evaluation framework for Pakistan, which, it is suggested, could also potentially be used in other developing countries. The framework is used to evaluate performance of public participation in EIA in terms of 40 attributes for four selected projects from the province of Punjab. The evaluation is based on interviews with stakeholders, review of EIA reports as well as public hearing proceedings and environmental approval conditions. The evaluation of the selected projects revealed an overall weak influence of public participation on substantive quality of EIA and on the final decision. Overall, EIA public participation has succeeded in providing a more egalitarian environment. Furthermore, it appears fair to say that sufficient time for submitting written comments on EIA reports as well as for raising concerns during public hearings had been given. Also, public consultation was significantly contributing to educating participants. Despite some impediments, it is argued that public participation in EIA is gradually gaining ground in Pakistan. Recommendations to enhance EIA public participation effectiveness in Pakistan include applying a more proactive approach which should take place before EIA is conducted and before site selection for development projects is happening.

[1]  Stefan Heiland.  Requirements and Methods for Public Participation in SEA , 2005 .

[2]  E. João,et al.  Implementing Strategic Environmental Assessment , 2005 .

[3]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[4]  Luca Del Furia,et al.  The effectiveness of provisions and quality of practices concerning public participation in EIA in Italy , 2000 .

[5]  A. Diduck,et al.  Public involvement in EA in Canada: a transformative learning perspective , 2001 .

[6]  W. Firestone,et al.  Multisite Qualitative Policy Research: Optimizing Description and Generalizability , 1983 .

[7]  C. Wood,et al.  A comparative evaluation of the EIA systems in Egypt, Turkey and Tunisia , 2002 .

[8]  J. Palerm,et al.  An Empirical‐Theoretical Analysis Framework for Public Participation in Environmental Impact Assessment , 2000 .

[9]  John Boyle,et al.  Cultural influences on implementing environmental impact assessment: insights from thailand, indonesia, and malaysia , 1998 .

[10]  Brian Salter,et al.  Public attitudes, scientific advice and the politics of regulatory policy: The case of BSE , 2002 .

[11]  John Glasson,et al.  Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment , 1999 .

[12]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Public Participation in Environmental Decisions: An Evaluation Framework Using Social Goals , 1998 .

[13]  R. Bisset.  Methods of Consultation and Public Participation , 2013 .

[14]  Asha Rajvanshi,et al.  Promoting Public Participation for Integrating Sustainability Issues in Environmental Decision-Making: The Indian Experience , 2003 .

[15]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect , 2007 .

[16]  Anne Shepherd,et al.  Beyond the Requirements: Improving Public Participation in EIA , 1997 .

[17]  Alan Bond,et al.  The interminable issue of effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory , 2004 .

[18]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[19]  Yan Wang,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment of Projects in the People's Republic of China: New Law, Old Problems , 2003 .

[20]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[21]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[22]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review , 1995 .

[23]  Christopher Wood,et al.  Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention , 2005 .

[24]  A. Sinclair,et al.  Public involvement in environmental impact assessment: a case study of hydro development in Kullu District, Himachal Pradesh, India , 2000 .

[25]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[26]  J. Walmsley,et al.  The role of environmental non-governmental organisations in the environmental impact assessment process in Japan , 2004 .

[27]  Ritu Paliwal,et al.  EIA practice in India and its evaluation using SWOT analysis , 2006 .

[28]  Thomas C. Beierle.  Democracy in Practice: Public Participation in Environmental Decisions , 2010 .

[29]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[30]  John O. Kakonge,et al.  Eia and good governance: Issues and lessons from africa , 1998 .