Shape from shading: new perspectives from the Polo Mint stimulus.

The visual system exploits prior knowledge on the world to disambiguate a scene. In particular, the inference of shape-fromshading relies on the fact that light comes from above our heads. Recent studies have helped make that assumption more precise and suggested that the preferred light source position was further biased on the left of the vertical. We investigated the generality of this result in two experiments with a different stimulus and a novel task. The stimulus was shaped like a ring (Polo Mint) divided in eight equal sectors. Depending on the assumed light source position, all sectors but one could be perceived as either convex or concave. In the first experiment, observers had to report the different shaped sector position (left or right side of the stimulus). In the second experiment, they had to classify the shape of the odd sector (convex or concave). Various amounts of blur were also applied on each stimulus. Results in both experiments confirm previous studies that observers prefer stimuli lit from the left rather than the right. We also demonstrate that left-lit stimuli give the observers a more sensitive perception of the shape of the objects. Finally, the second experiment confirms a preference for globally convex shapes, especially when the stimulus is severely blurred.

[1]  R. Basri,et al.  The role of convexity in perceptual completion: beyond good continuation , 1999, Vision Research.

[2]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Interaction of visual prior constraints , 2001, Vision Research.

[3]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Observer biases in the 3D interpretation of line drawings , 1998, Vision Research.

[4]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  D Kersten,et al.  Moving Cast Shadows Induce Apparent Motion in Depth , 1997, Perception.

[6]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Impossible Shadows and the Shadow Correspondence Problem , 2004, Perception.

[7]  José Chacón Perceived Contrast Explains Asymmetries in Visual-Search Tasks with Shaded Stimuli , 2004, Perception.

[8]  Roberto Casati,et al.  The Shadow Knows: A Primer on the Informational Structure of Cast Shadows , 2004, Perception.

[9]  P. Mamassian,et al.  Prior knowledge on the illumination position , 2001, Cognition.

[10]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Illusory motion from shadows , 1996, Nature.

[11]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[12]  P. Perona,et al.  Where is the sun? , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Neural correlates of shape from shading , 2003, Neuroreport.

[14]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  A Prior for Global Convexity in Local Shape-from-Shading , 2001, Perception.

[15]  I. Mcmanus,et al.  Is Light in Pictures Presumed to Come from the Left Side? , 2004, Perception.

[16]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  On the perception of shape from shading , 1988, Nature.

[17]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Bayesian Model of Surface Perception , 1997, NIPS.

[18]  Steffen Werner,et al.  Why Cast Shadows are Expendable: Insensitivity of Human Observers and the Inherent Ambiguity of Cast Shadows in Pictorial Art , 2004, Perception.

[19]  D. Knill,et al.  The perception of cast shadows , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Shape from shadows. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  Image segmentation and lightness perception , 2005, Nature.

[22]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Perceiving Illumination Inconsistencies in Scenes , 2005, Perception.

[23]  M. Ernst,et al.  Experience can change the 'light-from-above' prior , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[25]  Binocular depth reversals despite familiarity cues: an artifact? , 1990, Science.