Enhanced Utilization of Voltage Control Resources With Distributed Generation

Distributed generation (DG) is increasing in penetration on power systems across the world. In rural areas, voltage rise limits the permissible penetration levels of DG. Another increasingly important issue is the impact on transmission system voltages of DG reactive power demand. Here, a passive solution is proposed to reduce the impact on the transmission system voltages and overcome the distribution voltage rise barrier such that more DG can connect. The fixed power factors of the generators and the tap setting of the transmission transformer are determined by a linear programming formulation. The method is tested on a sample section of radial distribution network and on a model of the all island Irish transmission system illustrating that enhanced passive utilization of voltage control resources can deliver many of the benefits of active management without any of the expense or perceived risk, while also satisfying the conflicting objectives of the transmission system operator.

[1]  C. W. Taylor Power System Voltage Stability , 1993 .

[2]  A. R. Wallace,et al.  Optimal power flow evaluation of distribution network capacity for the connection of distributed generation , 2005 .

[3]  C. L. Masters Voltage rise: the big issue when connecting embedded generation to long 11 kV overhead lines , 2002 .

[4]  J.R. Abbad,et al.  Assessment of energy distribution losses for increasing penetration of distributed generation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[5]  L.A.F. Ferreira,et al.  Distributed Reactive Power Generation Control for Voltage Rise Mitigation in Distribution Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  A sustainability strategy for Ireland’s electricity network , 2009 .

[7]  P. Kundur,et al.  Power system stability and control , 1994 .

[8]  Mark O'Malley,et al.  A steady-state voltage stability analysis of power systems with high penetrations of wind , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[9]  Goran Strbac,et al.  Maximising penetration of wind generation in existing distribution networks , 2002 .

[10]  P. Kundur,et al.  Definition and classification of power system stability IEEE/CIGRE joint task force on stability terms and definitions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  Helder Leite,et al.  Network voltage controller for distributed generation , 2004 .

[12]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[13]  G.P. Harrison,et al.  Centralized and Distributed Voltage Control: Impact on Distributed Generation Penetration , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Carson W. Taylor,et al.  Definition and Classification of Power System Stability , 2004 .

[15]  A. Keane,et al.  Optimal allocation of embedded generation on distribution networks , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Optimal Utilization of Distribution Networks for Energy Harvesting , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[17]  T. Thiringer,et al.  Wind Farms as Reactive Power Ancillary Service Providers—Technical and Economic Issues , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion.

[18]  E. Vittal,et al.  Varying penetration ratios of wind turbine technologies for voltage and frequency stability , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting - Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century.

[19]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[20]  K. Tomsovic,et al.  Placement of dispersed generation systems for reduced losses , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[21]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Optimal Utilisation of Distribution Networks for Energy Harvesting , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting.

[22]  Gareth Harrison,et al.  MAXIMISATION OF INTERMITTENT DISTRIBUTED GENERATION IN ACTIVE NETWORKS , 2008 .