Life Cycle Assessment of Biobutanol Production Integrated to Sugarcane Biorefineries in Brazil

New sugarcane biorefinery routes considering the integral use of biomass have become more important to the strategic objectives of the bioenergy production expansion in Brazil, especially for diversifying and adding value to the sugarcane production chain. Among these new products, biobutanol has been increasingly investigated, mostly for its use as a fuel, since its energy density is greater than that of ethanol, but also to replace an established use as feedstock in the chemical industry. In view of the new green chemistry technological routes development, it becomes interesting and necessary assessing the viability of the butanol production from sugarcane. In this study, the sugarchemical route characterized by the fermentation of sugarcane juice was evaluated using the Life Cycle Asessment method considering arrangements for the process integration in the existing Brazilian sugarcane biorefineries: first and second generation using ABE fermentation (acetone-butanol-ethanol) with wild and genetically modified strains. The evaluation approach took into account the whole production chain, from the agricultural stage, through the transportation of sugarcane and vinasse, to the industrial process of biobutanol production and its use as liquid fuel for transport. The software package SimaPro and the CML 2 Baseline 2000 v2.05 method were used as tools for the environmental impact assessment. The life cycle inventories were obtained from literature and mass and energy balances taken from process computer simulation. Results showed that butanol produced from the lignocellulosic material (cane bagasse and straw) presents lower environmental impacts compared to first generation scenarios evaluated. As well as previous biofuels production assessment studies have already pointed out, the agricultural stage is the most relevant to the total environmental impacts in the butanol case. Nevertheless, the use of water, enzyme, equipment (carbon steel), and the emissions from the bagasse combustion could be highlighted as the most important in terms of environmental impacts for the industrial stage. Results for the productivity per tonne of sugarcane in first generation scenarios indicate that the efficiency of the ABE fermentation process needs to be improved so biobutanol could turn into an economic viable alternative. The production of second generation biobutanol, on the other hand, could be a viable alternative for the integral use of biomass adding value to the sugarcane production chain. Its analysis accounting for production and use as liquid fuel for transportation has shown that results are at the same level as the impacts related to ethanol from sugarcane, presenting advantages if compared with gasoline in terms of global impacts, such as global warming and ozone depletion potentials. Nevertheless, categories related to local impacts such as eutrophication and acidification potentials presented higher values for butanol in comparison with gasoline.

[1]  Ben Brehmer,et al.  Assessing the current Brazilian sugarcane industry and directing developments for maximum fossil fuel mitigation for the international petrochemical market , 2009 .

[2]  Marcelo Pereira da Cunha,et al.  Simulation of ethanol production from sugarcane in Brazil: economic study of an autonomous distillery , 2010 .

[3]  Cinthia Rubio Urbano da Silva,et al.  Sustainability assessment of bio-ethanol production in Brazil considering land use change, GHG emissions and socio-economic aspects , 2011 .

[4]  F. Júnior,et al.  Ministério do Meio Ambiente : consultoria jurídica : Parecer nº 107/2005/CGAJ/CONJUR/MMA , 2006 .

[5]  E. Figueiredo,et al.  Greenhouse gas balance due to the conversion of sugarcane areas from burned to green harvest in Brazil , 2011 .

[6]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Assessment of in situ butanol recovery by vacuum during acetone butanol ethanol (ABE) fermentation , 2012 .

[7]  Luis Augusto Barbosa Cortez,et al.  Can Brazil replace 5% of the 2025 gasoline world demand with ethanol? , 2009 .

[8]  Riitta L. Keiski,et al.  Challenges in biobutanol production: How to improve the efficiency? , 2011 .

[9]  Aldo Roberto Ometto,et al.  Lifecycle assessment of fuel ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[10]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[11]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Integrated versus stand-alone second generation ethanol production from sugarcane bagasse and trash. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Liu Yuan,et al.  OXO Market Supply and Demand Forecast & Investment Economic Analysis , 2012 .

[13]  Carlos José Caetano Bacha Indicadores de preços , 2011 .

[14]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Simulation of integrated first and second generation bioethanol production from sugarcane: comparison between different biomass pretreatment methods , 2011, Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology.

[15]  P. Dürre Biobutanol: An attractive biofuel , 2007, Biotechnology journal.

[16]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques , 2010 .

[17]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol - an assessment of the possibilities of certified production , 2007 .

[18]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[19]  CollinsDana International Energy Agency's “Bioenergy Task 43” , 2013 .

[20]  I. C. Macedo,et al.  Sugar cane's energy : twelve studies on Brazilian sugar cane agribusiness and its sustainability , 2005 .

[21]  V. Menon,et al.  Trends in bioconversion of lignocellulose: Biofuels, platform chemicals & biorefinery concept , 2012 .

[22]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Environmental and economic assessment of sugarcane first generation biorefineries in Brazil , 2012, Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy.

[23]  Stepan Wood,et al.  The International Organization for Standardization , 2013 .

[24]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  ISO 14041: Environmental management — life cycle assessment — goal and scope definition — inventory analysis , 1998 .

[25]  Eric Johnson Handbook on Life Cycle Assessment Operational Guide to the ISO Standards , 2003 .

[26]  J. Goldemberg Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future , 2007, Science.

[27]  Mark Mascal,et al.  Chemicals from biobutanol: technologies and markets , 2012 .

[28]  Rubens Maciel Filho,et al.  Butanol production in a first-generation Brazilian sugarcane biorefinery: technical aspects and economics of greenfield projects. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[29]  J. Seabra,et al.  Green house gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. , 2008 .