The role of supraglottic airway devices in obstetric anaesthesia

Purpose of review To discuss the role of supraglottic airway devices as rescue and primary airway devices in pregnant patients. Recent findings General anaesthesia in pregnant patients is associated with increased incidence of difficult and failed intubation, especially when performed for caesarean deliveries. The Difficult Airway Society and the Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association guidelines for the management of failed intubation recommend the use of second-generation supraglottic airway devices as a rescue airway strategy when failed intubation occurs. This practice is now widely accepted and embedded in routine teaching and clinical practice. On the other hand, there is little but growing evidence describing the use of supraglottic airway devices as the primary airway device and an alternative to endotracheal intubation for patients undergoing elective and emergency caesarean deliveries under general anaesthesia. Most of the published research supporting this practice was done on carefully selected patients who were nonobese and who did not have gastroesophageal reflux or anticipated difficult airway. Despite demonstrating high insertion success rates and low complication rates, these studies were underpowered and have thus far, failed to provide robust data on the true risk of aspiration in this setting. Summary Based on current scientific data, the evidence for the safe use of supraglottic airway devices as primary airway devices during general anaesthesia for caesarean deliveries is not compelling. However, their use as rescue airway devices remains a well established strategy supported by international guidelines.

[1]  C. Weiniger,et al.  A multicenter interdisciplinary survey of practices and opinions regarding oral intake during labor. , 2022, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[2]  J. Pandit,et al.  Major complications of airway management: a prospective multicentre observational study , 2022, Anaesthesia.

[3]  Yandong Jiang,et al.  Limiting Oral Intake during Labor: Do We Have It Right? , 2022, Anesthesiology.

[4]  X. Chang,et al.  Prevalence of risk stomach in laboring women allowed to unrestrictive oral intake: a comparative cross-sectional study , 2022, BMC Anesthesiology.

[5]  D. Chassard,et al.  Pregnancy and Labor Epidural Effects on Gastric Emptying: A Prospective Comparative Study , 2022, Anesthesiology.

[6]  D. Chassard,et al.  Ultrasound assessment of gastric contents prior to placental delivery: A prospective multicentre cohort study. , 2021, Anaesthesia, critical care & pain medicine.

[7]  M. Mushambi,et al.  General anesthesia in the parturient , 2021, International anesthesiology clinics.

[8]  R. Russell,et al.  Obstetric anaesthetic practice in the UK: a descriptive analysis of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database 2009-14. , 2020, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  M. Mushambi,et al.  General anaesthesia in obstetrics. , 2020, BJA education.

[10]  M. Mushambi,et al.  Supraglottic airway devices for Caesarean delivery under general anaesthesia: for all, for none, or for some? , 2020, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  P. Popivanov,et al.  Gastric emptying of carbohydrate drinks in term parturients before elective caesarean delivery: an observational study. , 2020, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[12]  A. Hodsdon,et al.  Comparison of Supraglottic Airway Devices With Endotracheal Intubation in Low-Risk Patients for Cesarean Delivery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2020, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  S. Milne,et al.  An ultrasound assessment of gastric emptying following tea with milk in pregnancy: A randomised controlled trial. , 2019, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[14]  B. Sng,et al.  Rescue supraglottic airway devices at caesarean delivery: What are the options to consider? , 2019, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[15]  R. Sultana,et al.  Association of Mallampati scoring on airway outcomes in women undergoing general anesthesia with Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway in cesarean section , 2019, BMC Anesthesiology.

[16]  R. Sultana,et al.  Comparison of Supreme laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal intubation for airway management during general anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial , 2019, BMC Anesthesiology.

[17]  A. Caughey,et al.  Guidelines for Antenatal and Preoperative care in Cesarean Delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations (Part 1) , 2018, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  R. Liao,et al.  General Anesthesia with the Use of SUPREME Laryngeal Mask Airway for Emergency Cesarean delivery: A Retrospective Analysis of 1039 Parturients , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[19]  S. M. Kinsella The ‘full stomach’: full time for sloppy terminology? , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[20]  A. Perlas,et al.  Point-of-care gastric ultrasound and aspiration risk assessment: a narrative review , 2018, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[21]  J. Carvalho,et al.  Gastric ultrasound in the third trimester of pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial to develop a predictive model of volume assessment , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[22]  P. van de Putte,et al.  The link between gastric volume and aspiration risk. In search of the Holy Grail? , 2018, Anaesthesia.

[23]  L. Kwanten,et al.  Supraglottic airway devices: current and future uses. , 2018, British journal of hospital medicine.

[24]  R. Sultana,et al.  Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway use in general Anesthesia for category 2 and 3 Cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study , 2017, BMC Anesthesiology.

[25]  Saravana Babu,et al.  Comparison of I-gel versus Endotracheal Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Prospective Randomized Control Study , 2017, Anesthesia, essays and researches.

[26]  S. M. Kinsella,et al.  Neonatal outcomes after failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia for caesarean section: Secondary analysis of a UKOSS case-control study. , 2017, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[27]  Dong-Xin Wang,et al.  Laryngeal Mask Airway for Cesarean Delivery: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study , 2017, Chinese medical journal.

[28]  A. Palanisamy,et al.  Choice of Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: An Analysis of the National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[29]  S. Amin,et al.  Can i-gel Replace Endotracheal Tube during Elective Cesarean Section? , 2016 .

[30]  K. Guleria,et al.  To evaluate the use of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing elective lower segment cesarean section under general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled study , 2016 .

[31]  D. Baidya,et al.  Routine use of laryngeal mask airway for cesarean section: Is it time to reconsider? , 2016 .

[32]  S. M. Kinsella,et al.  Failed tracheal intubation during obstetric general anaesthesia: a literature review. , 2015, International journal of obstetric anesthesia.

[33]  S. M. Kinsella,et al.  Obstetric Anaesthetists' Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics* , 2015, Anaesthesia.

[34]  A. Hasan,et al.  I-gel versus cuffed endotracheal tube in elective cesarean section (double-blind randomized study) , 2015 .

[35]  A. Riccoboni,et al.  Physiology of pregnancy: clinical anaesthetic implications , 2014 .

[36]  A. Sia,et al.  The LMA Supreme™ in 700 parturients undergoing Cesarean delivery: an observational study , 2012, Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie.

[37]  N. Mitsakakis,et al.  Gastric Sonography in the Fasted Surgical Patient: A Prospective Descriptive Study , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[38]  T. Cook,et al.  Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. , 2011, British journal of anaesthesia.

[39]  A. Sia,et al.  The use of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Caesarean Section - Experience in 3000 Cases , 2010, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[40]  J. Brimacombe,et al.  The laryngeal mask airway is effectièe (and probably safe) in selected healthy parturients for electièe Cesarean section: a prospectièe study of 1067 cases , 2001, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[41]  H. Schneck,et al.  Acid aspiration prophylaxis and caesarean section , 2000, Current opinion in anaesthesiology.

[42]  P. Szmuk,et al.  Peripartum general anasthesia without tracheal intubation: incidence of aspiration pneumonia , 2000, Anaesthesia.

[43]  C. L. Mendelson The aspiration of stomach contents into the lungs during obstetric anesthesia. , 1946, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[44]  A. Perlas,et al.  Term pregnant patients have similar gastric volume to non‐pregnant females: a single‐centre cohort study , 2019, British journal of anaesthesia.

[45]  D. Nickinovich,et al.  Practice Guidelines for Preoperative Fasting and the Use of Pharmacologic Agents to Reduce the Risk of Pulmonary Aspiration: Application to Healthy Patients Undergoing Elective Procedures , 2000 .

[46]  J. Ashley,et al.  Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in England and Wales 1982-1984. , 1989, Reports on health and social subjects.

[47]  A. Adelstein,et al.  Report on confidential enquiries into maternal deaths in England and Wales 1967-1969. , 1972, Reports on health and social subjects.