Global performance of traditional Chinese medicine over three decades

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which is divided into three subfields, including Chinese medicine, Chinese herb and acupuncture, attracts increasing attentions due to its challenging and significant medical values. This study employs bibliometric analysis to examine the profile of publication activity in TCM field as well as its subfields. The data are retrieved from the Science Citation Index Expanded database during 1980–2009, and 16,536 papers are identified for analysis. Generally speaking, proportions of papers in subfield of acupuncture decreased dramatically, while the proportions of papers of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb rose increasingly. This study finds that East Asia has the largest number of TCM papers, followed by North America and Europe. Furthermore, while China is ranked first in terms of the amount of TCM publications, USA gains the highest percentage of citations. As for regional specialty, mainly, scholars in East Asia publish intensively in Chinese medicine, while most of the scholars in North America and Europe probe into the study of acupuncture. In the latest two decades, China took the first place over Japan in subfields of both Chinese medicine and Chinese herb, while the US has always kept the largest share in acupuncture with a marked upward trend. Regarding the top-ranked TCM institution, Chinese Academy of Sciences located in China, is ranked first in the subfields of Chinese medicine and Chinese herb as well. As for Kyung Hee University, which is located in South Korea, is ranked first in the number of acupuncture papers and Harvard University is ranked first in number of acupuncture citations.

[1]  R Yuan,et al.  Traditional Chinese medicine: an approach to scientific proof and clinical validation. , 2000, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[2]  Xiang Diao,et al.  The reporting quality, scientific rigor, and ethics of randomized placebo-controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine compound formulations and the differences between Chinese and non-Chinese trials. , 2010, Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental.

[3]  Klea Katsouyanni,et al.  Collaborative research: Accomplishments & potential , 2008, Environmental health : a global access science source.

[4]  Stefanie Haustein,et al.  Reasons for and developments in international scientific collaboration: does an Asia–Pacific research area exist from a bibliometric point of view? , 2011, Scientometrics.

[5]  A E Hanson,et al.  Ancient medicine review. , 1996, Society for Ancient Medicine review.

[6]  Alan L Harvey,et al.  Natural products in drug discovery. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[7]  Begoña Jordá Albiñana,et al.  Análisis bibliométrico de las Publicaciones Científicas de América Latina, España y Portugal en la Categoría Materials Science, Ceramics de la base de datos JCR (SCI) (1997-2008) , 2009 .

[8]  Stephen Birch,et al.  A review of the reliability of traditional East Asian medicine diagnoses. , 2009, Journal of alternative and complementary medicine.

[9]  Tony Saich,et al.  Constitution of the People's Republic of China , 1983 .

[10]  Gerhard Litscher,et al.  Ten Years Evidence-based High-Tech Acupuncture–A Short Review of Centrally Measured Effects (Part II) , 2007, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[11]  T Takahashi,et al.  Traditional Chinese Medicine and Kampo: A Review from the Distant past for the Future , 2006, The Journal of international medical research.

[12]  P. Drasar,et al.  Recent advances in analysis of Chinese medical plants and traditional medicines. , 2004, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[13]  Kelvin Chan,et al.  Some aspects of toxic contaminants in herbal medicines. , 2003, Chemosphere.

[14]  Haiqi Zhang,et al.  A bibliometric study on Medicine Chinese Traditional in Medline database , 2005, Scientometrics.

[15]  T Hesketh,et al.  Health in China: Traditional Chinese medicine: one country, two systems , 1997, BMJ.

[16]  Ping-Chung Leung,et al.  A practical way of research in Chinese medicine. , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[17]  Barker Bausell,et al.  Assessing the consistency of traditional Chinese medical diagnosis: an integrative approach. , 2003, Alternative therapies in health and medicine.

[18]  De-Xin Kong,et al.  Where is the hope for drug discovery? Let history tell the future. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[19]  Michele Pezzoni,et al.  Scientific Productivity and Academic Promotion: A Study on French and Italian Physicists , 2010 .

[20]  Zhang Haiqi,et al.  A bibliometric study on Medicine Chinese Traditional in Medline database , 1994 .

[21]  Kuo-Chen Chou,et al.  Drug candidates from traditional chinese medicines. , 2008, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[22]  Edzard Ernst,et al.  Methodological aspects of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). , 2006, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[23]  Yuya Kajikawa,et al.  Towards institutional analysis of sustainability science: a quantitative examination of the patterns of research collaboration , 2009 .

[24]  C. Estabrooks,et al.  Mapping the field: a bibliometric analysis of the research utilization literature in nursing. , 2004, Nursing research.

[25]  Wen-yue Jiang,et al.  Therapeutic wisdom in traditional Chinese medicine: a perspective from modern science. , 2005, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[26]  N. Bhatt,et al.  Ayurveda and Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Comparative Overview , 2005, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[27]  Jun-ying Fu,et al.  [A bibliometric overview of traditional Chinese medicine research in Medline]. , 2010, Zhong xi yi jie he xue bao = Journal of Chinese integrative medicine.

[28]  Kelvin Chan,et al.  Chinese medicinal materials and their interface with Western medical concepts. , 2005, Journal of ethnopharmacology.