Potential for weediness of Bt cotton in northern Australia

Abstract The release of Bt cotton varieties genetically modified for increased tolerance to major cotton insect pests provided impetus for the reestablishment of a cotton industry in northern Australia. However, this stimulated concern that the addition of the gene might facilitate an increase in the potential for weediness of genetically modified cultivars in noncropping habitats. Bt and conventional cottonseeds were planted in 12 sites in northern Australia to test the hypothesis that there would be no increase in the ability of Bt cotton vs. conventional cotton to establish weedy, or invasive populations, defined as population growth over time greater than one, irrespective of location, habitat, seed type, or population density. Invasiveness was a factor of germination, survival, and recruitment. We examined whether the addition of the Bt gene would increase fitness of these parameters, and associated invasiveness. An irrigation drain was considered a high-risk habitat for cotton establishment, so an additional site was sown at that habitat to provide supplementary data to the original 12 sites. Location and habitat were the dominant factors influencing germination, survival, fecundity, and invasiveness. Bt and non-Bt cottonseeds did not differ in their ability to germinate, establish, and survive. After 2 yr, cotton plant survival was very low, and only 3 of 13 sites established fecund cotton populations. Measurements continued for an additional 2 yr at these sites. There was no increase in values for invasiveness for the Bt genotype treatments at any location or habitat after 2 yr or at two selected habitats after > 4 yr, demonstrating that the addition of the Bt gene will not confer increased fitness for weediness. Mean invasiveness values for each habitat, irrespective of genotype, were less than one, indicating that neither conventional nor Bt cotton would establish invasive cotton populations in northern Australian habitats. Nomenclature: Bt, Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki; cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Sicot 289’.

[1]  M. Crawley,et al.  Burial and seed survival in Brassica napus subsp. oleifera and Sinapis arvensis including a comparison of transgenic and non–transgenic lines of the crop , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[2]  M. Crawley,et al.  Biotechnology: Transgenic crops in natural habitats , 2001, Nature.

[3]  C. N. Stewart,et al.  Increased fitness of transgenic insecticidal rapeseed under insect selection pressure , 1997 .

[4]  J. Stewart,et al.  Production of fertile hybrid germplasm with diploid Australian Gossypium species for cotton improvement , 2004, Euphytica.

[5]  R. Groves,et al.  Towards a system to determine the national significance of weeds in Australia. , 2001 .

[6]  David M. J. S. Bowman,et al.  Variation in the composition and structure of tropical savannas as a function of rainfall and soil texture along a large‐scale climatic gradient in the Northern Territory, Australia , 1996 .

[7]  R. Freckleton,et al.  How does temporal variability affect predictions of weed population numbers , 1998 .

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Ecological risk assessment of transgenic pasture plants: a community gradient modelling approach , 2004 .

[9]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Agro-research for the semi-arid tropics: North-West Australia , 1985 .

[10]  J. Bergelson Changes in Fecundity Do Not Predict Invasiveness: A Model Study of Transgenic Plants , 1994 .

[11]  J. Westwood,et al.  Proceedings of a Workshop on Ecological Effects of Pest Resistance Genes in Managed Ecosystems , 1999 .

[12]  Hails,et al.  Genetically modified plants - the debate continues. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[13]  B. A. Auld,et al.  A model of a spreading plant population , 1980 .

[14]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Rainfall in the wet‐dry tropics: Extreme events at Darwin and similarities between years during the period 1870–1983 inclusive , 1985 .

[15]  D. Steila Soils and climate , 1987 .

[16]  Gary P. Fitt,et al.  Implementation and Impact of Transgenic Bt Cottons in Australia , 2004 .

[17]  Jan-Peter Nap,et al.  The release of genetically modified crops into the environment. Part II. Overview of ecological risk assessment. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  P. Fryxell The Natural History of the Cotton Tribe: Malvaceae, Tribe Gossypieae , 2000 .

[19]  M. Crawley,et al.  Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats , 1993, Nature.

[20]  P. Kareiva,et al.  Assessing the risks of invasion for genetically engineered plants: acceptable evidence and reasonable doubt. , 1996 .