A Poisson model for earthquake frequency uncertainties in seismic hazard analysis

Frequency‐magnitude distributions, and their associated uncertainties, are of key importance in statistical seismology. When fitting these distributions, the assumption of Gaussian residuals is invalid since event numbers are both discrete and of unequal variance. In general, the observed number in any given magnitude range is described by a binomial distribution which, given a large total number of events of all magnitudes, approximates to a Poisson distribution for a sufficiently small probability associated with that range. In this paper, we examine four earthquake catalogues: New Zealand (Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences), Southern California (Southern California Earthquake Center), the Preliminary Determination of Epicentres and the Harvard Centroid Moment Tensor (both held by the United States Geological Survey). Using independent Poisson distributions to model the observations, we demonstrate a simple way of estimating the uncertainty on the total number of events occurring in a fixed time period.

[1]  K. Aki.  17. Maximum Likelihood Estimate of b in the Formula logN=a-bM and its Confidence Limits , 1965 .

[2]  Tony Greenfield,et al.  Introduction to Statistics: A Non-Parametric Approach for The Social Sciences. , 1980 .

[3]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[4]  J. Green,et al.  The Error in Approximating Cumulative Binomial and Poisson Probabilities , 1986 .

[5]  D. Turcotte.  Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics , 1992 .

[6]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Earthquake Hazard Analysis: Issues and insights , 1992 .

[7]  Ian G. Main,et al.  Statistical physics, seismogenesis, and seismic hazard , 1996 .

[8]  Ian G. Main,et al.  A Poisson model for identifying characteristic size effects in frequency data: Application to frequency‐size distributions for global earthquakes, “starquakes”, and fault lengths , 2001 .

[9]  Graham J. Borradaile,et al.  Statistics of Earth Science Data , 2003 .

[10]  Graham J. Borradaile,et al.  Statistics of Earth Science Data: Their Distribution in Time, Space and Orientation , 2003 .

[11]  Roger M.W. Musson,et al.  Maximum earthquake magnitudes in the Aegean area constrained by tectonic moment release rates , 2003 .

[12]  Amr S. Elnashai,et al.  Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, Edited by Y. Bozorgnia and V. V. Bertero, 2004, ICC-CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, Hardcover, 1152 pages, Cost $190 US. , 2004 .

[13]  Michael Friendly,et al.  Discrete Distributions , 2005, Probability and Bayesian Modeling.

[14]  Pieter Vermeesch,et al.  Statistical uncertainty associated with histograms in the Earth sciences , 2005 .

[15]  Farzad Naeim.  Earthquake Engineering—From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering , 2005 .

[16]  L. Malagnini,et al.  Uncertainty analysis for seismic hazard in Northern and Central Italy , 2005 .

[17]  V. Kossobokov.  Testing earthquake prediction methods: «The West Pacific short-term forecast of earthquakes with magnitude MwHRV ≥ 5.8» , 2006 .

[18]  G. Roberts,et al.  A comparison of 103–105 year uplift rates on the South Alkyonides Fault, central Greece: Holocene climate stability and the formation of coastal notches , 2007 .

[19]  John McCloskey,et al.  Effect of the Sumatran mega-earthquake on the global magnitude cut-off and event rate , 2008 .