Prediction of Material Removal Rate for Chemical Mechanical Planarization Using Decision Tree-Based Ensemble Learning

Chemical mechanical planarization (CMP) has been widely used in the semiconductor industry to create planar surfaces with a combination of chemical and mechanical forces. A CMP process is very complex because several chemical and mechanical phenomena (e.g., surface kinetics, electrochemical interfaces, contact mechanics, stress mechanics, hydrodynamics, and tribochemistry) are involved. Predicting the material removal rate (MRR) in a CMP process with sufficient accuracy is essential to achieving uniform surface finish. While physics-based methods have been introduced to predict MRRs, little research has been reported on monitoring and predictive modeling of the MRR in CMP. This paper presents a novel decision tree-based ensemble learning algorithm that can train the predictive model of the MRR. The stacking technique is used to combine three decision tree-based learning algorithms, including the random forests (RF), gradient boosting trees (GBT), and extremely randomized trees (ERT), via a meta-regressor. The proposed method is demonstrated on the data collected from a CMP tool that removes material from the surface of wafers. Experimental results have shown that the decision tree-based ensemble learning algorithm using stacking can predict the MRR in the CMP process with very high accuracy.

[1]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[2]  Chang Ouk Kim,et al.  Recurrent feature-incorporated convolutional neural network for virtual metrology of the chemical mechanical planarization process , 2018, Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing.

[3]  S. Ramarajan,et al.  Modification of the Preston equation for the chemical-mechanical polishing of copper , 1998 .

[4]  Ranga Komanduri,et al.  Process-Machine Interaction (PMI) Modeling and Monitoring of Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) Process Using Wireless Vibration Sensors , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[5]  J. Friedman Greedy function approximation: A gradient boosting machine. , 2001 .

[6]  Robert X. Gao,et al.  A deep learning-based approach to material removal rate prediction in polishing , 2017 .

[7]  J. Friedman Stochastic gradient boosting , 2002 .

[8]  Satish T. S. Bukkapatnam,et al.  Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System Modeling of MRR and WIWNU in CMP Process With Sparse Experimental Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[9]  Sungzoon Cho,et al.  Semi-supervised support vector regression based on self-training with label uncertainty: An application to virtual metrology in semiconductor manufacturing , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Andy Liaw,et al.  Classification and Regression by randomForest , 2007 .

[11]  Hyunseop Lee,et al.  A wafer-scale material removal rate profile model for copper chemical mechanical planarization , 2011 .

[12]  Pierre Geurts,et al.  Extremely randomized trees , 2006, Machine Learning.

[13]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[14]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  An ensemble learning-based prognostic approach with degradation-dependent weights for remaining useful life prediction , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Contact of nominally flat surfaces , 1966, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  Abhijit Chandra,et al.  Performance and modeling of paired polishing process , 2016 .

[17]  Shih-Chieh Lin,et al.  A study of the effects of polishing parameters on material removal rate and non-uniformity , 2002 .

[18]  Ranga Komanduri,et al.  Process Performance Prediction for Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) by Integration of Nonlinear Bayesian Analysis and Statistical Modeling , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing.

[19]  Bernard Zenko,et al.  Is Combining Classifiers with Stacking Better than Selecting the Best One? , 2004, Machine Learning.

[20]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Semi-empirical material removal rate distribution model for SiO2 chemical mechanical polishing (CMP) processes , 2013 .

[21]  Connor Jennings,et al.  Cloud-Based Parallel Machine Learning for Tool Wear Prediction , 2018 .

[22]  Dazhong Wu,et al.  Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications , 2018, Journal of Manufacturing Systems.

[23]  David Dornfeld,et al.  Material removal mechanism in chemical mechanical polishing: theory and modeling , 2001 .

[24]  Satish T. S. Bukkapatnam,et al.  A graph-theoretic approach for quantification of surface morphology variation and its application to chemical mechanical planarization process , 2015 .

[25]  Yuan Di,et al.  Adaptive virtual metrology for semiconductor chemical mechanical planarization process using GMDH-type polynomial neural networks , 2018 .

[26]  D.P. Solomatine,et al.  AdaBoost.RT: a boosting algorithm for regression problems , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37541).

[27]  Connor Jennings,et al.  A Comparative Study on Machine Learning Algorithms for Smart Manufacturing: Tool Wear Prediction Using Random Forests , 2017 .

[28]  Fritz Klocke,et al.  Material Removal Mechanisms in Lapping and Polishing , 2003 .

[29]  Tin Kam Ho,et al.  The Random Subspace Method for Constructing Decision Forests , 1998, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[30]  Daniel F. Schmidt,et al.  High-Dimensional Bayesian Regularised Regression with the BayesReg Package , 2016, 1611.06649.

[31]  Ronald J. Gutmann,et al.  Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials , 1997 .

[32]  Zhi-Hua Zhou,et al.  Ensemble Methods: Foundations and Algorithms , 2012 .

[33]  G. Nanz,et al.  Modeling of chemical-mechanical polishing: a review , 1995 .

[34]  George A. F. Seber,et al.  Linear regression analysis , 1977 .

[35]  Mahadevaiyer Krishnan,et al.  Chemical mechanical planarization: slurry chemistry, materials, and mechanisms. , 2010, Chemical reviews.