Update on the safety and efficacy of commercial ultrasound contrast agents in cardiac applications

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) are currently used throughout the world in both clinical and research settings. The concept of contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging originated in the late 1960s, and the first commercially available agents were initially developed in the 1980s. Today's microbubbles are designed for greater utility and are used for both approved and off-label indications. In October 2007, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed additional product label warnings that included serious cardiopulmonary reactions, several new disease-state contraindications, and a mandated 30 min post-procedure monitoring period for the agents Optison and Definity. These additional warnings were prompted by reports of cardiopulmonary reactions that were temporally related but were not clearly attributable to these UCAs. Subsequent published reports over the following months established not only the safety but also the improved efficacy of clinical ultrasound applications with UCAs. The FDA consequently updated the product labeling in June 2008 and reduced contraindications, although it continued to monitor select patients. In addition, a post-marketing program was proposed to the sponsors for a series of safety studies to further assess the risk of UCAs. Then in October 2011, the FDA leadership further downgraded the warnings after hearing the results of the post-marketing data, which revealed continued safety and improved efficacy. The present review focuses on the use of UCAs in today's clinical practice, including the approved indications, a variety of off-label uses, and the most recent data, which affirms the safety and efficacy of UCAs.

[1]  T. Porter,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Latest Developments and Clinical Utility , 2015, Current Cardiology Reports.

[2]  M. McCulloch,et al.  Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. , 2014, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[3]  Wei Li,et al.  The feasibility and clinical utility of myocardial contrast echocardiography in clinical practice: results from the incorporation of myocardial perfusion assessment into clinical testing with stress echocardiography study. , 2014, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  C. Herzog,et al.  Perflutren-based echocardiographic contrast in patients with right-to-left intracardiac shunts. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[5]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Effect of Optison on pulmonary artery systolic pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  P. Colonna,et al.  Comparison of sulfur hexafluoride microbubble (SonoVue)-enhanced myocardial contrast echocardiography with gated single-photon emission computed tomography for detection of significant coronary artery disease: a large European multicenter study. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  R. Senior,et al.  Ischaemic burden determined by myocardial contrast echocardiography predicts mortality in patients with new-onset shortness of breath, suspected heart failure and no previous coronary artery disease. , 2013, International Journal of Cardiology.

[8]  Odd Helge Gilja,et al.  Treatment of human pancreatic cancer using combined ultrasound, microbubbles, and gemcitabine: a clinical case study. , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  Lynette M. Smith,et al.  Patient outcome following 2 different stress imaging approaches: a prospective randomized comparison. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Burstow,et al.  The safety profile of perflutren microsphere contrast echocardiography during rest and stress imaging: results from an Australian multicentre cohort. , 2013, Heart, lung & circulation.

[11]  M. Main,et al.  Update on Contrast Echocardiography: Safety and Utility , 2012, Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports.

[12]  D. Spevack,et al.  Administration of Perflutren Contrast Agents during Transthoracic Echocardiography Is Not Associated with a Significant Increase in Acute Mortality Risk , 2012, Cardiology.

[13]  Masood Ahmad,et al.  CaRES (Contrast Echocardiography Registry for Safety Surveillance): a prospective multicenter study to evaluate the safety of the ultrasound contrast agent definity in clinical practice. , 2012, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[14]  J. Bernstein,et al.  The effect of Definity on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics in patients. , 2012, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[15]  J. Romero,et al.  Safety of echocardiographic contrast in hospitalized patients with pulmonary hypertension: a multi-center study. , 2012, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  B. I. Choi,et al.  The EFSUMB Guidelines on the Non-Hepatic Clinical Applications of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): a New Dawn for the Escalating Use of This Ubiquitous Technique , 2012, Ultraschall in der Medizin.

[17]  H. Fukuda,et al.  Clinical Usefulness of Contrast-Enhanced Three-Dimensional Ultrasound Imaging with Sonazoid for Hepatic Tumor Lesions , 2011 .

[18]  S. Feinstein,et al.  A retrospective comparison of mortality in critically ill hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[19]  A. DeMaria,et al.  An observational study of the occurrence of serious adverse reactions among patients who receive optison in routine medical practice. , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[20]  M. Main Ultrasound contrast agent safety: from anecdote to evidence. , 2009, JACC Cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  Mustafa Kurt,et al.  Impact of contrast echocardiography on evaluation of ventricular function and clinical management in a large prospective cohort. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Hibberd,et al.  Acute mortality in hospitalized patients undergoing echocardiography with and without an ultrasound contrast agent (multicenter registry results in 4,300,966 consecutive patients). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[23]  Harald Becher,et al.  American Society of Echocardiography Consensus Statement on the Clinical Applications of Ultrasonic Contrast Agents in Echocardiography. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[24]  R. Grimm,et al.  The safety of deFinity and Optison for ultrasound image enhancement: a retrospective analysis of 78,383 administered contrast doses. , 2008, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[25]  C. Herzog,et al.  Incidence of adverse events associated with use of perflutren contrast agents for echocardiography. , 2008, JAMA.

[26]  P. Grayburn Product safety compromises patient safety (an unjustified black box warning on ultrasound contrast agents by the Food and Drug Administration). , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[27]  P. Grayburn,et al.  Thinking outside the "box"-the ultrasound contrast controversy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[28]  S. V. D. Meer,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: resonances of coated bubbles , 2007 .

[29]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Contrast and Harmonic Imaging Improves Accuracy and Efficiency of Novice Readers for Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography , 2002, Echocardiography.

[30]  M. Kern,et al.  Effect of intravenous contrast for left ventricular opacification and border definition on sensitivity and specificity of dobutamine stress echocardiography compared with coronary angiography in technically difficult patients. , 2001, American heart journal.

[31]  D Ehler,et al.  Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography Council on Cardiac Sonography. , 2001, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[32]  J. Gottdiener,et al.  Efficacy and safety of the novel ultrasound contrast agent perflutren (definity) in patients with suboptimal baseline left ventricular echocardiographic images. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[33]  I. Kronzon,et al.  Contrast echocardiography clarifies uninterpretable wall motion in intensive care unit patients. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[34]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  F. Calliada,et al.  Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. , 1998, European journal of radiology.

[36]  N C Nanda,et al.  History of echocardiographic contrast agents , 1997, Clinical cardiology.

[37]  U. Ikeda,et al.  Biochemical markers of coagulation activation in mitral stenosis, atrial fibrillation, and cardiomyopathy , 1997, Clinical cardiology.

[38]  R. Bing,et al.  Microbubble dynamics visualized in the intact capillary circulation. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[39]  S. Feinstein,et al.  Computer methods for myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiography. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[40]  O. L. Kwan,et al.  In vivo correlation of thermodilution cardiac output and videodensitometric indicator-dilution curves obtained from contrast two-dimensional echocardiograms. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[41]  E. G. Tickner,et al.  Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion Abnormalities with Contrast‐enhanced Two‐dimensional Echocardiography , 1982, Circulation.

[42]  Youshouzhai Gu Echo , 1980, The Craft of Poetry.

[43]  F. Romeo,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: Transmission of echoes to the left heart across the pulmonary vascular bed , 1980 .

[44]  E. Carstensen,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of cavitation at catheter tips. , 1970, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[45]  M. Ziskin,et al.  Ultrasonic detection of in-vivo cavitation and pressure effects of high-speed injections through catheters. , 1969, Investigative radiology.

[46]  R. Gramiak,et al.  Echocardiography of the aortic root. , 1968, Investigative radiology.

[47]  M. Hibberd,et al.  Acute mortality in critically ill patients undergoing echocardiography with or without an ultrasound contrast agent. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[48]  A. Weyman,et al.  Contrast echocardiography: past, present, and...future? , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[49]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Verification of myocardial contrast two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of perfusion defects in ischemic myocardium. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[50]  E. G. Tickner,et al.  Why do the lungs clear ultrasonic contrast? , 1980, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.