Twenty‐four well plate miniature bioreactor system as a scale‐down model for cell culture process development

Increasing the throughput and efficiency of cell culture process development has become increasingly important to rapidly screen and optimize cell culture media and process parameters. This study describes the application of a miniaturized bioreactor system as a scaled‐down model for cell culture process development using a CHO cell line expressing a recombinant protein. The microbioreactor system (M24) provides non‐invasive online monitoring and control capability for process parameters such as pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and temperature at the individual well level. A systematic evaluation of the M24 for cell culture process applications was successfully completed. Several challenges were initially identified. These included uneven gas distribution in the wells due to system design and lot to lot variability, foaming issues caused by sparging required for active DO control, and pH control limitation under conditions of minimal dissolved CO2. A high degree of variability was found which was addressed by changes in the system design. The foaming issue was resolved by addition of anti‐foam, reduction of sparge rate, and elimination of DO control. The pH control limitation was overcome by a single manual liquid base addition. Intra‐well reproducibility, as indicated by measurements of process parameters, cell growth, metabolite profiles, protein titer, protein quality, and scale‐equivalency between the M24 and 2 L bioreactor cultures were very good. This evaluation has shown feasibility of utilizing the M24 as a scale‐down tool for cell culture application development under industrially relevant process conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;102: 148–160. © 2008 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  P. Sharp,et al.  Construction of a modular dihydrofolate reductase cDNA gene: analysis of signals utilized for efficient expression , 1982, Molecular and cellular biology.

[2]  Philippe Girard,et al.  TubeSpin satellites: a fast track approach for process development with animal cells using shaking technology , 2004 .

[3]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Bioprocess monitoring. , 2002, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[4]  Jonathan I. Betts,et al.  Miniature bioreactors: current practices and future opportunities , 2006, Microbial cell factories.

[5]  J. Büchs,et al.  Device for sterile online measurement of the oxygen transfer rate in shaking flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[6]  Hideo Tanaka,et al.  Development of a novel box-shaped shake flask with efficient gas exchange capacity , 1998 .

[7]  Klavs F. Jensen,et al.  Gene expression analysis of Escherichia coli grown in miniaturized bioreactor platforms for high-throughput analysis of growth and genomic data , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  Xudong Ge,et al.  Validation of an optical sensor-based high-throughput bioreactor system for mammalian cell culture. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  Hansjörg Hauser,et al.  Mammalian Cell Biotechnology in Protein Production , 1997 .

[10]  Ashraf Amanullah,et al.  Twenty‐four‐well plate miniature bioreactor high‐throughput system: Assessment for microbial cultivations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  G. Rao,et al.  Low-cost microbioreactor for high-throughput bioprocessing. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Microbioreactor arrays with parametric control for high‐throughput experimentation , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  J Büchs,et al.  Characterisation of operation conditions and online monitoring of physiological culture parameters in shaken 24-well microtiter plates , 2005, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering.

[14]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Design and performance of a 24‐station high throughput microbioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[15]  L. Chasin,et al.  Isolation of Chinese hamster cell mutants deficient in dihydrofolate reductase activity. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Ingo Klimant,et al.  Modeling of Mixing in 96‐Well Microplates Observed with Fluorescence Indicators , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[17]  J E Bailey,et al.  Effect of ammonium ion and extracellular pH on hybridoma cell metabolism and antibody production , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[18]  John M. Woodley,et al.  Fluid mixing in shaken bioreactors: Implications for scale-up predictions from microlitre-scale microbial and mammalian cell cultures , 2006 .

[19]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  Roland Wagner.  2.1 Metabolic Control of Animal Cell Culture Processes , 1997 .

[21]  A. Nienow,et al.  Further studies of the culture of mouse hybridomas in an agitated bioreactor with and without continuous sparging. , 1992, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  John M Woodley,et al.  The use of microscale processing technologies for quantification of biocatalytic Baeyer-Villiger oxidation kinetics. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  Yinjie J. Tang,et al.  Evaluation of the effects of various culture conditions on Cr(VI) reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR‐1 in a novel high‐throughput mini‐bioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  W. Nashabeh,et al.  Carbohydrate analysis of a chimeric recombinant monoclonal antibody by capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. , 1999, Analytical chemistry.

[25]  B Allen,et al.  Design of a prototype miniature bioreactor for high throughput automated bioprocessing , 2003 .

[26]  Christian M. Metallo,et al.  Serum-free suspension cultivation of PER.C6(R) cells and recombinant adenovirus production under different pH conditions. , 2002, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[27]  Dirk Weuster-Botz,et al.  Parallel reactor systems for bioprocess development. , 2005, Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology.

[28]  John M Woodley,et al.  Accelerated design of bioconversion processes using automated microscale processing techniques. , 2003, Trends in biotechnology.

[29]  S. C. Li,et al.  Optimizing separation conditions for proteins and peptides using imaged capillary isoelectric focusing. , 1998, Journal of chromatography. A.

[30]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[31]  K. Jensen,et al.  In situ measurement of bioluminescence and fluorescence in an integrated microbioreactor. , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.