Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes

Cues of phenotypic condition should be among those used by women in their choice of mates. One marker of better phenotypic condition is thought to be symmetrical bilateral body and facial features. However, it is not clear whether women use symmetry as the primary cue in assessing the phenotypic quality of potential mates or whether symmetry is correlated with other facial markers affecting physical attractiveness. Using photographs of men's faces, for which facial symmetry had been measured, we found a relationship between women's attractiveness ratings of these faces and symmetry, but the subjects could not rate facial symmetry accurately. Moreover, the relationship between facial attractiveness and symmetry was still observed, even when symmetry cues were removed by presenting only the left or right half of faces. These results suggest that attractive features other than symmetry can be used to assess phenotypic condition. We identified one such cue, facial masculinity (cheek–bone prominence and a relatively longer lower face), which was related to both symmetry and full– and half–face attractiveness.

[1]  D. Perrett,et al.  Menstrual cycle alters face preference , 1999, Nature.

[2]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[3]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The scent of symmetry: A human sex pheromone that signals fitness? , 1999 .

[4]  Thornhill,et al.  Individual differences in developmental precision and fluctuating asymmetry: a model and its implications , 1999 .

[5]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty , 1998 .

[6]  D. I. Lewis-Jones,et al.  Developmental Stability, Ejaculate Size, and Sperm Quality in Men , 1998 .

[7]  D. Waynforth,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry and human male life-history traits in rural Belize , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Stefan Van Dongen,et al.  How repeatable is the estimation of developmental stability by fluctuating asymmetry? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[9]  Michael C. Whitlock,et al.  The repeatability of fluctuating asymmetry: a revision and extension , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  P. Todd,et al.  Mate choice turns cognitive , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Bilateral Symmetry and Sexual Selection: A Meta‐Analysis , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[13]  S. Gangestad,et al.  Developmental stability and human violence , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  R. Thornhill,et al.  DEVELOPMENTAL STABILITY, DISEASE AND MEDICINE , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[15]  A. Møller Developmental Stability and Fitness: A Review , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[16]  R. Thornhill,et al.  The evolutionary psychology of extrapair sex: The role of fluctuating asymmetry , 1997 .

[17]  R. Thornhill,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the heritability of developmental stability , 1997 .

[18]  M. Kirkpatrick GOOD GENES AND DIRECT SELECTION IN THE EVOLUTION OF MATING PREFERENCES , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[19]  L. Rowe,et al.  The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  Michael Whitlock,et al.  The heritability of fluctuating asymmetry and the genetic control of developmental stability , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[21]  M. Hans,et al.  Essentials of Facial Growth , 1996 .

[22]  Austin Burt,et al.  Perspective: The Evolution of Fitness , 1995 .

[23]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Human Fluctuating Asymmetry and Sexual Behavior , 1994 .

[24]  A. Møller Sexual Selection and the Barn Swallow , 1994 .

[25]  R. Thornhill,et al.  Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. , 1994 .

[26]  Innes C. Cuthill,et al.  Preference for symmetric males by female zebra finches , 1994, Nature.

[27]  Randy Thornhill,et al.  Female preference for the pheromone of males with low fluctuating asymmetry in the Japanese scorpionfly (Panorpa japonica: Mecoptera) , 1992 .

[28]  A. Karter,et al.  Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[29]  A. Grafen Biological signals as handicaps. , 1990, Journal of theoretical biology.

[30]  D. Buss,et al.  Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures , 1989, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[31]  Mark Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Handicap Mechanism of Sexual Selection Does Not Work , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[32]  P. Taylor,et al.  The lek paradox is not resolved , 1982 .

[33]  J. Simpson,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry, sociosexuality, and intrasexual competitive tactics. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[34]  L. Mealey,et al.  Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: a monozygotic co-twin comparison. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  Victor S. Johnston,et al.  Facial beauty and the late positive component of event‐related potentials , 1997 .

[36]  Brian Leung,et al.  Fluctuating asymmetry in relation to stress and fitness: Effects of trait type as revealed by meta-analysis , 1996 .

[37]  K. Grammer,et al.  Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. , 1994, Journal of comparative psychology.

[38]  A. Karter,et al.  PARASITES, BRIGHT MALES, AND THE IMMUNOCOMPETENCE , 1992 .

[39]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  What do women want? Facialmetric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male facial physical attractiveness. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  B. Charlesworth,et al.  Unravelling the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex : a Commentary on ' Mutation–selection Balance and the Evolutionary Advantage of Sex and Recombination ' , 2022 .