Inter- and intra-limb generalization of adaptation during catching

Abstract. We have previously shown that healthy adults require a few trials to adapt to a changed ball weight during catching. It is not known whether this adaptation generalizes to the opposite arm or to different configurations of the same arm. We tested healthy adult subjects catching balls of different weight while maintaining the hand within a vertical spatial "window." In experiment 1, subjects caught a series of light and heavy balls, first with one hand and then with the other. In experiment 2, subjects caught a series of light and heavy balls, first with the catching arm in either a "bent" or a "straight" configuration and then with the same arm in the other configuration. A percentage transfer value was calculated to determine the degree to which previous experience with a given ball weight in one context affected performance of the same task in a new context (i.e., different arm or different arm configuration). Results showed that generalization occurred both between arms and within an arm. However, the subjects who switched arms showed less generalization than those who switched arm positions. Specifically, the percentage transfer value for subjects who switched arms was 58%, while the percentage transfer for those who switched arm positions was 100%. These results support the idea that the motor system is able to generalize adaptive control of ball catching to the contralateral arm and to different arm configurations. Our findings are also in agreement with the recent notion that multiple internal representations of a task may exist in the CNS. Because there was partial generalization between the two arms, we conclude that there must be a representation stored and used for catching that is not effector specific, but rather can be utilized by brain regions controlling either arm. However, because generalization was only complete within an arm, we conclude that another sensorimotor representation exists, which might only be stored in brain regions specific to a single arm.

[1]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. II. Specificity and storage of multiple gaze-throw calibrations. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  F A Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[3]  David A. Winter,et al.  Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement , 1990 .

[4]  M. Gorassini,et al.  Catching a ball: contributions of intrinsic muscle stiffness, reflexes, and higher order responses. , 1994, Canadian journal of physiology and pharmacology.

[5]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  The role of preparation in tuning anticipatory and reflex responses during catching , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  F. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  The motor system does not learn the dynamics of the arm by rote memorization of past experience. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  Hiroshi Imamizu,et al.  Human cerebellar activity reflecting an acquired internal model of a new tool , 2000, Nature.

[8]  J. Lackner,et al.  Motor adaptation to Coriolis force perturbations of reaching movements: endpoint but not trajectory adaptation transfers to the nonexposed arm. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  I Salimi,et al.  Specificity of internal representations underlying grasping. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  D Tweed,et al.  Prediction and compensation by an internal model for back forces during finger opening in an overarm throw. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Spatial Generalization from Learning Dynamics of Reaching Movements , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D M Wolpert,et al.  Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control , 1998, Neural Networks.

[13]  J R Flanagan,et al.  The Role of Internal Models in Motion Planning and Control: Evidence from Grip Force Adjustments during Movements of Hand-Held Loads , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Hallett,et al.  Adaptation motor learning of arm movements in patients with cerebellar disease. , 1996, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  R L Sainburg,et al.  Intersegmental dynamics are controlled by sequential anticipatory, error correction, and postural mechanisms. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[17]  A. Bastian,et al.  Cerebellar subjects show impaired adaptation of anticipatory EMG during catching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  W. T. Thach,et al.  Throwing while looking through prisms. I. Focal olivocerebellar lesions impair adaptation. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Hans Forssberg,et al.  Formation and lateralization of internal representations underlying motor commands during precision grip , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  E Bizzi,et al.  Motor learning by field approximation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Amy J Bastian,et al.  Additional somatosensory information does not improve cerebellar adaptation during catching , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  R Shadmehr,et al.  Electromyographic Correlates of Learning an Internal Model of Reaching Movements , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.