How Would Pyrrho have been Socially Valued? Social Desirability and Social Utility of Conflict Regulation

Mugny and his colleagues have shown that conflict is sometimes detrimental for learning, but other times beneficial, depending on how it is regulated. Yet, it is assumed that laypeople perceive conflict as uniformly negative. We argue that the valence of these lay perceptions depends on the mode of conflict regulation. Epistemic and relational protective conflict regulation behaviors (integrative and submissive response, respectively) can be described as more focused on the other than relational competitive conflict regulation (self-confirmatory response); thus, they should be perceived as more socially desirable. Moreover, epistemic and competitive regulations can be described as more focused on the self than protective regulation; thus, they should be perceived as more socially useful. First-year psychology students (N = 119) participants evaluated three bogus respondents allegedly regulating conflict in an epistemic, competitive, or protective manner. Results supported both hypotheses, suggesting that conflict is not to be avoided per se and can be positively valued as a function of its regulation.

[1]  Conflit de centrations et progrès cognitif , 1976 .

[2]  Baruch B. Schwarz,et al.  Argumentation and Explanation in Conceptual Change: Indications From Protocol Analyses of Peer-to-Peer Dialog , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Conflict Elaboration and Cognitive Outcomes , 2004 .

[4]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Dealing with a disagreeing partner: Relational and epistemic conflict elaboration , 2007 .

[5]  A. Kruglanski.  The Psychology of Closed Mindedness , 2004 .

[6]  Jean-Léon Beauvois,et al.  Judgment norms, social utility, and individualism , 2004 .

[7]  A. Abele,et al.  Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  Allen C. Amason.  Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams , 1996 .

[9]  K. Jehn.  A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict , 1995 .

[10]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment , 2008 .

[11]  Annelies E. M. Van Vianen,et al.  Managing relationship conflict and the effectiveness of organizational teams , 2001 .

[12]  G. Mugny,et al.  Social Influence Dynamics in Aptitude Tasks , 2001 .

[13]  Cynthia L. Uline,et al.  Constructive Conflict: How Controversy Can Contribute to School Improvement , 2003, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[14]  D. D. Steiner,et al.  Comparative Optimism, So Useful , 2012 .

[15]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Understanding Positive Attitudes toward Helping Peers: The Role of Mastery Goals and Academic Self-Efficacy , 2014 .

[16]  D. Berlyne.  Conflict, arousal, and curiosity , 2014 .

[17]  G. Peeters,et al.  Evaluative meanings of adjectives in vitro and in context : some theoretical implications and practical consequences of positive-negative asymmetry and behavioral-adaptive concepts of evaluation , 1992 .

[18]  Robin L. Pinkley,et al.  Dimensions of conflict frame: Disputant interpretations of conflict. , 1990 .

[19]  G. Mugny,et al.  Comparaisons sociales des compétences et dynamiques d'influence sociale dans les tâches d'aptitudes , 2003 .

[20]  S. Chaiken.  The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[21]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Achievement goal promotion at university: social desirability and social utility of mastery and performance goals. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Jean-Léon Beauvois,et al.  Normativeness and individualism , 2005 .

[23]  Catherine Esnard,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Social valorization among pupils and the effect on teachers’ judgments , 2008 .

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Classroom Conflict: Controversy Versus Debate in Learning Groups , 1985 .

[25]  Christa S. C. Asterhan,et al.  Epistemic and interpersonal dimensions of peer argumentation: Conceptualization and quantitative assessment , 2013 .

[26]  Cary J. Roseth,et al.  The Impact of Constructive Controversy on Moral Development , 2010 .

[27]  P. Legrenzi,et al.  Majority and minority influence, task representation and inductive reasoning , 1996 .

[28]  W. Doise,et al.  Socio-cognitive conflict and structure of individual and collective performances , 1978 .

[29]  M. Matteucci.  Social utility versus social desirability of students’ attributional self-presentation strategies , 2014 .

[30]  John T. E. Richardson,et al.  Eta Squared and Partial Eta Squared as Measures of Effect Size in Educational Research. , 2011 .

[31]  N. Sommet,et al.  To Confirm or to Conform? Performance Goals as a Regulator of Conflict with More Competent Others , 2014 .

[32]  N. Dubois,et al.  Lay Psychology and the Social Value of Persons , 2009 .

[33]  Paul E. Spector,et al.  Stress in the workplace: a comparison of gender and occupations , 1999 .

[34]  G. Mugny,et al.  Learning from Conflict , 2012 .

[35]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  If you're Looking at the Cell Means, You're Not Looking at Only the Interaction (Unless All Main Effects Are Zero) , 1991 .

[36]  Britta K. Morris-Rothschild,et al.  Teachers' Conflict Management Styles: The Role of Attachment Styles and Classroom Management Efficacy. , 2006 .

[37]  B. Beersma,et al.  A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace , 2001 .

[38]  G. Mugny,et al.  Chapitre 7. Les paradoxes de l’expertise : influence sociale et (in)compétence de soi et d’autrui , 1998 .

[39]  F. Murray,et al.  When two wrongs make a right: Promoting cognitive change by social conflict. , 1982 .

[40]  N. Dubois,et al.  Theory of the social value of persons applied to organizations: Typologies of “good” leaders and recruitment , 2010 .

[41]  G. Mugny,et al.  The coordination of problem solving strategies: when low competence sources exert more influence on task processing than high competence sources. , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[42]  Fabrizio Butera,et al.  Conflicts and social influences in hypothesis testing. , 2001 .

[43]  M. Afzalur Rahim,et al.  Toward a Theory of Managing Organizational Conflict , 2002 .

[44]  Céline Darnon,et al.  Mastery and performance goals predict epistemic and relational conflict regulation , 2006 .

[45]  G. Mugny,et al.  Performance goals in conflictual social interactions: towards the distinction between two modes of relational conflict regulation. , 2014, The British journal of social psychology.