The Complexity of Self–Complexity: An Associated Systems Theory Approach

Abstract The current work proposed a new measurement of self–complexity based on Carlston's (1994) Associated Systems Theory (AST). AST is a systematic approach to classifying the cognitive representations of social entities and, as such, it provides a rich and theoretically based framework for examining self–concept representation in ways that existent approaches cannot. In the current study, an AST–based measure of self–complexity showed evidence of the buffering effect (i.e., when facing greater stress in their lives, those greater in self–complexity reported greater well–being in terms of fewer physical illnesses and less depression). However, this buffering effect was achieved only when an AST process–based scoring method (i.e., distance in AST space) was used and not when the traditional scoring method (i.e., H) was used. Implications of these results for understanding self–concept representation, AST, and their consequences are discussed.

[1]  I. Gotlib,et al.  The meaning and measurement of self-complexity , 1999 .

[2]  S. Fiske,et al.  The Handbook of Social Psychology , 1935 .

[3]  R. Woolfolk,et al.  Self-complexity, self-evaluation, and depression: an examination of form and content within the self-schema. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[4]  E. Higgins,et al.  Beyond pleasure and pain. , 1997, The American psychologist.

[5]  K. Locke H as a Measure of Complexity of Social Information Processing , 2003, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[6]  Anthony G. Greenwald,et al.  The Self as a Memory System : Powerful , but Ordinary , 2022 .

[7]  J. Kihlstrom,et al.  The self as a knowledge structure. , 1994 .

[8]  H. Markus,et al.  Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. , 1991 .

[9]  R. Wyer Associated systems theory : a systematic approach to cognitive representations of persons , 1994 .

[10]  D. Carlston Impression formation and the modular mind: The associated systems theory. , 1992 .

[11]  J. Steinberg,et al.  Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis , 2002 .

[12]  Robert J. Rydell,et al.  Whose self is it anyway? Self-aspect control moderates the relation between self-complexity and well-being. , 2005 .

[13]  P. Niedenthal,et al.  Possible self-complexity and affective reactions to goal-relevant evaluation. , 1992, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  J. D. Campbell,et al.  Cognitive and emotional reactions to daily events: the effects of self-esteem and self-complexity. , 1991, Journal of personality.

[15]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[16]  M. Rosenberg Society and the adolescent self-image , 1966 .

[17]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity as a cognitive buffer against stress-related illness and depression. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[19]  O. John,et al.  The divided self: concurrent and longitudinal effects of psychological adjustment and social roles on self-concept differentiation. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  W. A. Scott,et al.  Structure of natural cognitions. , 1969, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Sheldon Cohen,et al.  Positive Events and Social Supports as Buffers of Life Change Stress , 1983 .

[22]  K. Gergen The Concept of the Self , 2020, The Invention of The Self.

[23]  D. J. Lee Society and the Adolescent Self-Image , 1969 .

[24]  Deidra J. Schleicher,et al.  A Cognitive Evaluation of Frame-of-Reference Rater Training: Content and Process Issues. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[25]  A. McConnell,et al.  Organization of the self-concept and the suppression of self-relevant thoughts , 2002 .

[26]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Illusion and well-being: a social psychological perspective on mental health. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  P. Linville,et al.  Self-complexity and affective extremity: Don't put all of your eggs in one cognitive basket. , 1985 .

[28]  P. Kendall Healthy thinking 1 , 1993 .

[29]  Shann Turnbull,et al.  Self-Regulation , 1997 .

[30]  L. Abramson,et al.  The dynamic self: how the content and structure of the self-concept change with mood. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  Robert J. Rydell,et al.  Expectations of consistency about the self: Consequences for self-concept formation , 2002 .

[32]  Heather M. Claypool,et al.  The effects of verbal and visual interference on impressions: An associated-systems approach , 2002 .