Optimization and allocation of spinning reserves in a low-carbon framework

Low-carbon electric power systems are often characterized by high shares of renewables, such as wind power. The variable nature and limited predictability of some renewables will require novel system operation methods to properly size and cost-efficiently allocate the required reserves. The current state-of-the-art stochastic unit commitment models internalize this sizing and allocation process by considering a set of scenarios representing the stochastic input during the unit commitment optimization. This results in a cost-efficient scheduling of reserves, while maintaining the reliability of the system. However, calculation times are typically high. Therefore, in this paper, we merge a state-of-the-art probabilistic reserve sizing technique and stochastic unit commitment model with a limited number of scenarios in order to reduce the computational cost. Results obtained for a power system with a 30% wind energy penetration show that this hybrid approach allows to approximate the expected operational costs and reliability of the resulting unit commitment of the stochastic model at roughly one thirtieth of the computational cost. The presented hybrid unit commitment model can be used by researchers to assess the impact of uncertainty on power systems or by independent system operators to optimize their unit commitment decisions taking into account the uncertainty in their system.

[1]  C.R. Philbrick,et al.  Modeling Approaches for Computational Cost Reduction in Stochastic Unit Commitment Formulations , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[2]  P. Carpentier,et al.  Stochastic optimization of unit commitment: a new decomposition framework , 1996 .

[3]  Kenneth Bruninx A modeling framework for the integration of intermittent renewables: stochastic unit commitment , 2014 .

[4]  H. Madsen,et al.  From probabilistic forecasts to statistical scenarios of short-term wind power production , 2009 .

[5]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  Toward scalable, parallel progressive hedging for stochastic unit commitment , 2013, 2013 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[6]  A. Papavasiliou,et al.  Reserve Requirements for Wind Power Integration: A Scenario-Based Stochastic Programming Framework , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  A. Conejo,et al.  Scenario Reduction for Futures Market Trading in Electricity Markets , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  N. Growe-Kuska,et al.  Scenario reduction and scenario tree construction for power management problems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Bologna Power Tech Conference Proceedings,.

[9]  Ralf Gollmer,et al.  Stochastic Power Generation Unit Commitment in Electricity Markets: A Novel Formulation and a Comparison of Solution Methods , 2009, Oper. Res..

[10]  M. O'Malley,et al.  Unit Commitment for Systems With Significant Wind Penetration , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[11]  P. Sauer,et al.  Wind power day-ahead uncertainty management through stochastic unit commitment policies , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[12]  Michal Kaut,et al.  Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming , 2007 .

[13]  Robin Girard,et al.  Evaluating the quality of scenarios of short-term wind power generation , 2012 .

[14]  Kenneth Bruninx,et al.  A Statistical Description of the Error on Wind Power Forecasts for Probabilistic Reserve Sizing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy.

[15]  V. Miranda,et al.  Unit commitment and operating reserves with probabilistic wind power forecasts , 2011, 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech.

[16]  Deepak Rajan,et al.  IBM Research Report Minimum Up/Down Polytopes of the Unit Commitment Problem with Start-Up Costs , 2005 .

[17]  Dissertação De Mestrado Apresentada,et al.  WIND POWER FORECASTING UNCERTAINTY AND UNIT COMMITMENT , 2014 .