Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature*

A considerable amount of research has been conducted over a long period of time into the effects of graphical and tabular representations on decision-making performance. To date, however, the literature appears to have arrived at few conclusions with regard to the performance of the two representations. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a theory, based on information processing theory, to explain under what circumstances one representation outperforms the other. The fundamental aspects of the theory are: (1) although graphical and tabular representations may contain the same information, they present that information in fundamentally different ways; graphical representations emphasize spatial information, while tables emphasize symbolic information; (2) tasks can be divided into two types, spatial and symbolic, based on the type of information that facilitates their solution; (3) performance on a task will be enhanced when there is a cognitive fit (match) between the information emphasized in the representation type and that required by the task type; that is, when graphs support spatial tasks and when tables support symbolic tasks; (4) the processes or strategies problem solvers use are the crucial elements of cognitive fit since they provide the link between representation and task; the processes identified here are perceptual and analytical; (5) so long as there is a complete fit of representation, processes, and task type, each representation will lead to both quicker and more accurate problem solving. The theory is validated by its success in explaining the results of published studies that examine the performance of graphical and tabular representations in decision making.

[1]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  The Impact of the Mode of Information Presentation on Learning and Performance , 1980 .

[2]  L. E. Bourne,et al.  Encoding the levels of information in pictures and words. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[3]  K. Michael Aschenbrenner,et al.  Single-peaked risk preferences and their dependability on the gambles' presentation mode. , 1978 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[5]  Edward J. Lusk,et al.  The Effect of Cognitive Style and Report Format on Task Performance: The MIS Design Consequences , 1979 .

[6]  Peter Wright,et al.  The Relevance of Decision Process Models in Structuring Persuasive Messages , 1975 .

[7]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Investigation of the Effectiveness of Color and Graphical Information Presentation Under Varying Time Constraints , 1986, MIS Q..

[8]  S. Ullman.  Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[9]  V. S. Reed,et al.  Pictorial superiority effect. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[10]  W. E. Pracht,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Graphics‐Based DSS to Support Problem Structuring , 1988 .

[11]  G. Murphy,et al.  Memory for forms: Common memory formats for verbal and visual stimulus presentations , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[12]  Robert McGill,et al.  An Experiment in Graphical Perception , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[13]  W. Cleveland,et al.  Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods , 1984 .

[14]  Melvin Manis,et al.  Can the availability heuristic explain vividness effects , 1986 .

[15]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[16]  Peter Wright.  Consumer Choice Strategies: Simplifying Vs. Optimizing , 1975 .

[17]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The Value of Unit Price Information , 1977 .

[18]  Edwin A. Fleishman,et al.  Systems for describing human tasks. , 1982 .

[19]  William A. Wallace,et al.  The Effects of 3D Imagery on Managerial Data Interpretation , 1986, MIS Q..

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[21]  J. N. Washburne.  An experimental study of various graphic, tabular, and textual methods of presenting quantitative material , 1927 .

[22]  H. Simon,et al.  Why are some problems hard? Evidence from Tower of Hanoi , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Ron Weber,et al.  Structured tools and conditional logic: an empirical investigation , 1986, CACM.

[24]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the effectiveness of computer graphics for decision support: a cumulative experimental approach , 1986, CACM.

[25]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  An Effective Display of Unit Price Information , 1975 .

[26]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the impact of data display format on recall performance , 1988, CACM.

[27]  W. Wilcox.  Numbers and the News: Graph, Table or Text? , 1964 .

[28]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  The effect of task demands and graphical format on information processing strategies , 1989 .

[29]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  Information-Presentation Format and Learning Goals as Determinants of Consumers' Memory Retrieval and Choice Processes , 1982 .

[30]  P. Slovic,et al.  Preference Reversals: A Broader Perspective , 1983 .

[31]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  COMPUTER GRAPHICS AS DECISION AIDS: DIRECTIONS FOR RESEARCH* , 1984 .

[32]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  ICIS Paper: Methodological Issues in Experimental IS Research: Experiences and Recommendations , 1985, MIS Q..

[33]  G. L. Grace.  Application of empirical methods to computer-based system design. , 1966, The Journal of applied psychology.

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[35]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  An Experimental Comparison of Tabular and Graphic Data Presentation , 1984, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[36]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Verbal reports as data. , 1980 .

[37]  James R. Bettman,et al.  Information Format and Choice Task Effects in Decision Making , 1979 .

[38]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies , 1977 .

[39]  David K. Simkin,et al.  An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception , 1987 .

[40]  Larry D. Rosen,et al.  An eye fixation analysis of choice and judgment with multiattribute stimuli , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[41]  D. Campbell.  Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[42]  R. Hogarth,et al.  BEHAVIORAL DECISION THEORY: PROCESSES OF JUDGMENT AND CHOICE , 1981 .

[43]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[44]  Herbert A Simon,et al.  The understanding process: Problem isomorphs , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Some MIS Design Variables , 1977, MIS Q..

[46]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Graphical presentation of accounting data for financial forecasting: An experimental investigation , 1989 .

[47]  Richard W. Scamell,et al.  An Examination of Two Screen/Report Design Variables in an Information Recall Context* , 1990 .

[48]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Cognitive strategies and looping constructs: an empirical study , 1983, CACM.

[49]  B. Dosher,et al.  Strategies for multiattribute binary choice. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Report format and task complexity: Interaction in risk judgments , 1986 .

[51]  H. T. Norris.  Mauritanian medicine in the Hassaniya dialect , 1977 .

[52]  William Remus,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Graphical and Tabular Data Presentations on Decision Making , 1984 .

[53]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  An Evaluation of Alphanumeric, Graphic, and Color Information Displays , 1981 .

[54]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1987 .

[55]  R. Wood.  Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[56]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Adaptive Strategy Selection in Decision Making. , 1988 .

[57]  R. W. Driver,et al.  The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information , 1983, MIS Q..

[58]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of the Use of Computer-Based Graphics in Decision Making , 1981 .

[59]  W. C. Howell,et al.  Uncertainty measurement: A cognitive taxonomy , 1978 .

[60]  L. Carter,et al.  An experiment on the design of tables and graphs used for presenting numerical data. , 1947, The Journal of applied psychology.

[61]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[62]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Graphics and managerial decision making: research-based guidelines , 1988, CACM.

[63]  Donald Lamar Davis.  An experimental investigation of the form of information presentation, psychological type of the user, and performance within the context of a management information system , 1981 .

[64]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[65]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Process Tracing Methods in Decision Support Systems Research: Exploring the Black Box , 1987, MIS Q..

[66]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Information displays and preference reversals , 1988 .