Rapid model-based inter-disciplinary design of a CubeSat mission

With an increase in the use of small, modular, resource-limited satellites for Earth orbiting applications, the benefit to be had from a model-based architecture that rapidly searches the mission trade-space and identifies near-optimal designs is greater than ever. This work presents an architecture that identifies trends between conflicting objectives (e.g. lifecycle cost and performance) and decision variables (e.g. orbit altitude and inclination) such that informed assessment can be made as to which design/s to take on for further analysis. The models within the architecture exploit analytic methods where possible, in order avoid computationally expensive numerical propagation, and achieve rapid convergence. Two mission cases are studied; the first is an Earth observation satellite and presents a trade-off between ground sample distance and revisit time over a ground target, given altitude as the decision variable. The second is a satellite with a generic scientific payload and shows a more involved trade-off, between data return to a ground station and cost of the mission, given variations in the orbit altitude, inclination and ground station latitude. Results of each case are presented graphically and it is clear that non-intuitive results are captured that would typically be missed using traditional, point-design methods, where only discrete scenarios are examined.

[1]  Eberhard Gill,et al.  Formation flying within a constellation of nano-satellites: The QB50 mission , 2010 .

[2]  Roger Chapman Burk Closed-Form Approximation of Revisit Rate for Low-Altitude Satellites , 2013 .

[3]  Irene Arianti Budianto,et al.  A collaborative optimization approach to improve the design and deployment of satellite constellations , 2000 .

[4]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[5]  Ali Ravanbakhsh,et al.  Multiobjective optimization applied to structural sizing of low cost university-class microsatellite projects , 2012 .

[6]  David Krejci,et al.  A survey and assessment of the capabilities of Cubesats for Earth observation , 2012 .

[7]  Manas Bajaj,et al.  Enterprise modeling for CubeSats , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[8]  D. King-hele,et al.  Satellite orbits in an atmosphere : theory and applications , 1987 .

[9]  The Long-Term Forecast of Station View Periods , 1994, 2010.06021.

[10]  M. Lo The coverage of elliptical orbits using ergodic theory , 2004, 2004 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.04TH8720).

[11]  Colin R. McInnes,et al.  Needs assessment of gossamer structures in communications platform end-of-life disposal , 2013 .

[12]  William Marshall,et al.  Planet Labs’ Remote Sensing Satellite System , 2013 .

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Rania Hassan,et al.  Spacecraft Reliability-Based Design Optimization Under Uncertainty Including Discrete Variables , 2008 .

[15]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[16]  James R. Wertz,et al.  Space Mission Analysis and Design , 1992 .

[17]  Viorel Badescu,et al.  The International Handbook of Space Technology , 2014 .

[18]  M. J. Bentum,et al.  Inter-satellite links for cubesats , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[19]  Khurram Khurshid,et al.  A survey of camera modules for CubeSats - Design of imaging payload of ICUBE-1 , 2013, 2013 6th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies (RAST).

[20]  Erwin Mooij,et al.  A methodology for system-of-systems design in support of the engineering team , 2012 .

[21]  James Cutler,et al.  Initial Flight Results of the RAX-2 Satellite , 2012 .

[22]  Craig E. Peterson,et al.  The Zeus Mission Study — An application of automated collaborative design , 1999 .

[23]  E. Fosse,et al.  Model based systems engineering (MBSE) applied to Radio Aurora Explorer (RAX) CubeSat mission operational scenarios , 2013, 2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[24]  John P. W. Stark,et al.  Spacecraft systems engineering , 1995 .

[25]  David J. Weeks,et al.  The First US Army Satellite in Fifty Years: SMDC-ONE First Flight Results , 2011 .

[26]  Gwenael Guillois,et al.  X Band Downlink for CubeSat: From Concept to Prototype , 2013 .

[27]  David J. Weeks,et al.  SMDC-ONE: An Army Nanosatellite Technology Demonstration , 2009 .

[28]  Malcolm Macdonald,et al.  Through-life modelling of nano-satellite power system dynamics , 2013 .

[29]  Jordi Puig-Suari,et al.  CubeSat: The Development and Launch Support Infrastructure for Eighteen Different Satellite Customers on One Launch , 2001 .

[30]  A. E. Roy Satellite orbits in an atmosphere: Theory and applications ?. Blackie & Son Limited, Glasgow (1987). xi+291 pp. U.K. £49.00 , 1988 .

[31]  E. Peragin,et al.  X Band Downlink for CubeSat , 2012 .

[32]  Nancy Bray NASA Awards First CubeSat-Class Launch Services Contract , 2015 .