Interactivity as a Double-Edged Sword: Parsing Out the Effects of Modality Interactivity on Anti-Smoking Message Processing and Persuasion

This study combines the heuristic-systematic model of persuasion with user interface literature to examine how website interactivity influences processing of anti-smoking messages and smoking outcome beliefs. We conducted a pilot experiment with 112 current smokers and found that the interactive website elicited more heuristic processing among participants, which diminished their outcome beliefs and website attitudes. However, their positive interface perception functioned as a salient cue that led to greater systematic processing, which outperformed the negative impact of interactivity. It is recommended for future research to examine the effect of interactivity on persuasion with other types of interface features and health messages.

[1]  Shyam Sundar,et al.  Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction , 2009 .

[2]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .

[3]  Miguel Ángel López-Navarro,et al.  The antecedent role of personal environmental values in the relationships among trust in companies, information processing and risk perception , 2014 .

[4]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Linking the Heuristic-Systematic Model and Depth of Processing , 2002, Commun. Res..

[5]  Stephen L. Brown,et al.  The inhibitory effect of a distressing anti-smoking message on risk perceptions in smokers , 2007 .

[6]  Bobby J. Calder,et al.  Evidence that user-generated content that produces engagement increases purchase behaviours , 2016 .

[7]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[8]  Kirk L. Wakefield,et al.  Can A Retail Web Site be Social? , 2007 .

[9]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.

[10]  Christian Schemer,et al.  Toward Improving the Validity and Reliability of Media Information Processing Measures in Surveys , 2008 .

[11]  JungAe Yang,et al.  Effects of Popularity-Based News Recommendations (“Most-Viewed”) on Users' Exposure to Online News , 2016 .

[12]  D. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al.  Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators , 2015, New Media Soc..

[14]  M. Sherif,et al.  The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.

[15]  Spiro Kiousis,et al.  Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..

[16]  Yuping Liu,et al.  A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects , 2009 .

[17]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[18]  Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al.  Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[19]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[20]  Kurt Neuwirth,et al.  Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing , 2002, Commun. Res..

[21]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  How does Parallax Scrolling Influence User Experience? A Test of TIME (Theory of Interactive Media Effects) , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[22]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .

[23]  Hua Wang,et al.  From the Experience of Interactivity and Entertainment to Lower Intention to Smoke: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Path Analysis of a Web-Based Smoking Prevention Program for Adolescents , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  S. Leatherdale,et al.  Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status. , 2012, Health reports.

[25]  Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al.  Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .

[26]  Yung Kyun Choi,et al.  How do 3-dimensional images promote products on the Internet? , 2014 .

[27]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. , 1995 .

[28]  LuYaobin,et al.  Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities , 2012, DSS 2012.

[29]  Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al.  AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .

[30]  Wei-Na Lee,et al.  Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Interactivity , 2002 .

[31]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[32]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.

[33]  Sonali Kumar,et al.  Promote physical activity among college students: Using media richness and interactivity in web design , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  三嶋 博之 The theory of affordances , 2008 .

[35]  Yuping Liu,et al.  Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.

[36]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  D. Berry,et al.  Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information , 2005 .

[38]  Jeeyun Oh,et al.  How Does Interactivity Persuade? An Experimental Test of Interactivity on Cognitive Absorption, Elaboration, and Attitudes , 2015 .

[39]  Guohua Wu,et al.  The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .

[40]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[41]  Yan Huang,et al.  Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME) , 2015 .

[42]  Yaobin Lu,et al.  Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing of Specialist Versus Generalist Sources in Online Media , 2010 .

[44]  S. Shyam Sundar,et al.  Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information , 1995 .

[46]  Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al.  Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers’ Online Flow Experience , 2012 .

[47]  Sharon Dunwoody,et al.  Studying Heuristic‐Systematic Processing of Risk Communication , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[48]  R. Petty,et al.  When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .

[49]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[50]  S. Chapman,et al.  Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[51]  G. Breukelen ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies , 2006 .

[52]  Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al.  Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print , 2002 .

[54]  E. Erdfelder,et al.  Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[55]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. , 1996 .

[56]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[57]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Health information-seeking and perceptions of website credibility: Examining Web-use orientation, message characteristics, and structural features of websites , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[58]  Hwiman Chung,et al.  Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Web Site Preference and Memory: Role of Personal Motivation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..