Interactivity as a Double-Edged Sword: Parsing Out the Effects of Modality Interactivity on Anti-Smoking Message Processing and Persuasion
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Shyam Sundar,et al. Social psychology of interactivity in human-website interaction , 2009 .
[2] J. Burgoon,et al. Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence , 2000 .
[3] Miguel Ángel López-Navarro,et al. The antecedent role of personal environmental values in the relationships among trust in companies, information processing and risk perception , 2014 .
[4] Sharon Dunwoody,et al. Linking the Heuristic-Systematic Model and Depth of Processing , 2002, Commun. Res..
[5] Stephen L. Brown,et al. The inhibitory effect of a distressing anti-smoking message on risk perceptions in smokers , 2007 .
[6] Bobby J. Calder,et al. Evidence that user-generated content that produces engagement increases purchase behaviours , 2016 .
[7] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[8] Kirk L. Wakefield,et al. Can A Retail Web Site be Social? , 2007 .
[9] John T. Cacioppo,et al. The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion , 1986, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology.
[10] Christian Schemer,et al. Toward Improving the Validity and Reliability of Media Information Processing Measures in Surveys , 2008 .
[11] JungAe Yang,et al. Effects of Popularity-Based News Recommendations (“Most-Viewed”) on Users' Exposure to Online News , 2016 .
[12] D. Roskos-Ewoldsen,et al. Attitude and norm accessibility affect processing of anti-smoking messages. , 2008, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.
[13] Eun-Ju Lee,et al. Effects of infographics on news elaboration, acquisition, and evaluation: Prior knowledge and issue involvement as moderators , 2015, New Media Soc..
[14] M. Sherif,et al. The psychology of attitudes. , 1946, Psychological review.
[15] Spiro Kiousis,et al. Interactivity: a concept explication , 2002, New Media Soc..
[16] Yuping Liu,et al. A Dual-Process Model of Interactivity Effects , 2009 .
[17] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[18] Bernard C. Y. Tan,et al. Effects of Interactivity on Website Involvement and Purchase Intention , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..
[19] S. Chaiken. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .
[20] Kurt Neuwirth,et al. Person-Effects and Heuristic-Systematic Processing , 2002, Commun. Res..
[21] S. Shyam Sundar,et al. How does Parallax Scrolling Influence User Experience? A Test of TIME (Theory of Interactive Media Effects) , 2018, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[22] Miriam J. Metzger,et al. Credibility and trust of information in online environments: The use of cognitive heuristics , 2013 .
[23] Hua Wang,et al. From the Experience of Interactivity and Entertainment to Lower Intention to Smoke: A Randomized Controlled Trial and Path Analysis of a Web-Based Smoking Prevention Program for Adolescents , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.
[24] S. Leatherdale,et al. Assessment of validity of self-reported smoking status. , 2012, Health reports.
[25] Daniel J. O'Keefe,et al. Message Properties, Mediating States, and Manipulation Checks: Claims, Evidence, and Data Analysis in Experimental Persuasive Message Effects Research , 2003 .
[26] Yung Kyun Choi,et al. How do 3-dimensional images promote products on the Internet? , 2014 .
[27] Jon A. Krosnick,et al. Measures and manipulations of strength-related properties of attitudes: Current practice and future directions. , 1995 .
[28] LuYaobin,et al. Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities , 2012, DSS 2012.
[29] Sriram Kalyanaraman,et al. AROUSAL, MEMORY, AND IMPRESSION-FORMATION EFFECTS OF ANIMATION SPEED IN WEB ADVERTISING , 2004 .
[30] Wei-Na Lee,et al. Antecedents and Consequences of Perceived Interactivity , 2002 .
[31] J. Zaichkowsky. Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .
[32] S. Dunwoody,et al. Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. , 1999, Environmental research.
[33] Sonali Kumar,et al. Promote physical activity among college students: Using media richness and interactivity in web design , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[34] 三嶋 博之. The theory of affordances , 2008 .
[35] Yuping Liu,et al. Developing a scale to measure the interactivity of websites , 2003, Journal of Advertising Research.
[36] S. Chaiken,et al. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[37] D. Berry,et al. Effects of active information processing on the understanding of risk information , 2005 .
[38] Jeeyun Oh,et al. How Does Interactivity Persuade? An Experimental Test of Interactivity on Cognitive Absorption, Elaboration, and Attitudes , 2015 .
[39] Guohua Wu,et al. The Mediating Role of Perceived Interactivity in the Effect of Actual Interactivity on Attitude Toward the Website , 2005 .
[40] A. Hayes. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .
[41] Yan Huang,et al. Toward a Theory of Interactive Media Effects (TIME) , 2015 .
[42] Yaobin Lu,et al. Enhancing perceived interactivity through network externalities: An empirical study on micro-blogging service satisfaction and continuance intention , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..
[43] S. Shyam Sundar,et al. Heuristic Versus Systematic Processing of Specialist Versus Generalist Sources in Online Media , 2010 .
[44] S. Shyam Sundar,et al. Interactivity and memory: Information processing of interactive versus non-interactive content , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[45] S. Chaiken,et al. The interplay of heuristic and systematic processing of social information , 1995 .
[46] Eva A van Reijmersdal,et al. Interactivity in Brand Web Sites: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Responses Explained by Consumers’ Online Flow Experience , 2012 .
[47] Sharon Dunwoody,et al. Studying Heuristic‐Systematic Processing of Risk Communication , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.
[48] R. Petty,et al. When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion , 2006 .
[49] S. Chaiken,et al. Promoting systematic processing in low-motivation settings: effect of incongruent information on processing and judgment. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[50] S. Chapman,et al. Self-exempting beliefs about smoking and health: differences between smokers and ex-smokers. , 1993, American journal of public health.
[51] G. Breukelen. ANCOVA versus change from baseline had more power in randomized studies and more bias in nonrandomized studies , 2006 .
[52] Jacquelyn A. Burkell,et al. Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[53] S. Dunwoody,et al. An Investigation of Elaboration and Selective Scanning as Mediators of Learning From the Web Versus Print , 2002 .
[54] E. Erdfelder,et al. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses , 2009, Behavior research methods.
[55] Shelly Chaiken,et al. Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. , 1996 .
[56] Dianne Cyr,et al. Perceived interactivity leading to e-loyalty: Development of a model for cognitive-affective user responses , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[57] Stephen A. Rains,et al. Health information-seeking and perceptions of website credibility: Examining Web-use orientation, message characteristics, and structural features of websites , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[58] Hwiman Chung,et al. Effects of Perceived Interactivity on Web Site Preference and Memory: Role of Personal Motivation , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..