The focus of this paper is two-fold: 1) a discussion of a process by which a probabilistic risk assessments (PRA) system model is used to direct a multi-disciplinary development project. 2) Under this framework, a potential technique for the application of the First-Order Reliability Method (FORM) and Second-Order Reliability Method (SORM) to provide probabilistic failure data for PRA of structural systems. Technique 2) is an elaboration of the analysis techniques described in chapter 14 of [1]. Specifically, the technique relies on the concept of the limit state function in conjunction with varying levels of model fidelity, sound engineering judgment, and expert opinion. This methodology is complementary to the Response Surface Method presented in [2] and is best utilized during the conceptual or preliminary stages of a design project. This technique is beneficial when reliability data is not readily available and/or one is constrained by aggressive development schedules. As the design matures, the events in the system event tree can be systematically re-defined by a process that uses the results of refined physics-based models.
[1]
Robert E. Melchers,et al.
Structural Reliability: Analysis and Prediction
,
1987
.
[2]
E.J. Zampino,et al.
System reliability analysis with the response surface method
,
2008,
2008 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.
[3]
Joseph R. Fragola,et al.
A risk evaluation approach for safety in aerospace preliminary design
,
2003,
Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 2003..
[4]
Homayoon Dezfuli,et al.
Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners (Second Edition)
,
2011
.
[5]
Safie Fayssal,et al.
Use of Probabilistic Engineering Methods in the Detailed Design and Development Phases of the NASA Ares Launch Vehicle
,
2008
.
[6]
Andrzej S. Nowak,et al.
Reliability of Structures
,
2000
.