Dynamical network of residue–residue contacts reveals coupled allosteric effects in recognition, catalysis, and mutation

Significance How exactly protein motions facilitate substrate recognition and catalysis has remained largely unanswered. Characterization of protein dynamics at atomistic level is essential to understanding function. Molecular dynamics and NMR are helpful in this regard; however, analyzing multidimensional data from very long molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to elucidate key dynamical features observed in NMR remains very challenging. We present results from an approach for data analysis in which dynamics is defined in terms of interresidue contact formation and breaking. Analyzing simulation data on a therapeutically important Cyclophilin A and carrying out NMR experiments, we uncovered remarkable and unprecedented changes in its motions at a site over 15 Å from the active site upon substrate binding and how mutation in this distal site affects catalysis. Detailed understanding of how conformational dynamics orchestrates function in allosteric regulation of recognition and catalysis remains ambiguous. Here, we simulate CypA using multiple-microsecond-long atomistic molecular dynamics in explicit solvent and carry out NMR experiments. We analyze a large amount of time-dependent multidimensional data with a coarse-grained approach and map key dynamical features within individual macrostates by defining dynamics in terms of residue–residue contacts. The effects of substrate binding are observed to be largely sensed at a location over 15 Å from the active site, implying its importance in allostery. Using NMR experiments, we confirm that a dynamic cluster of residues in this distal region is directly coupled to the active site. Furthermore, the dynamical network of interresidue contacts is found to be coupled and temporally dispersed, ranging over 4 to 5 orders of magnitude. Finally, using network centrality measures we demonstrate the changes in the communication network, connectivity, and influence of CypA residues upon substrate binding, mutation, and during catalysis. We identify key residues that potentially act as a bottleneck in the communication flow through the distinct regions in CypA and, therefore, as targets for future mutational studies. Mapping these dynamical features and the coupling of dynamics to function has crucial ramifications in understanding allosteric regulation in enzymes and proteins, in general.

[1]  L. Kay,et al.  Intrinsic dynamics of an enzyme underlies catalysis , 2005, Nature.

[2]  C. Simmerling,et al.  ff14SB: Improving the Accuracy of Protein Side Chain and Backbone Parameters from ff99SB. , 2015, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[3]  H. Scheraga,et al.  Proline cis-trans isomerization and protein folding. , 2002, Biochemistry.

[4]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[5]  Christophe Dugave,et al.  Cis-trans isomerization of organic molecules and biomolecules: implications and applications. , 2003, Chemical reviews.

[6]  Mohammad M. Sultan,et al.  Allosteric pathways in imidazole glycerol phosphate synthase , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Z. Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Dynamical networks in tRNA:protein complexes , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Is allostery an intrinsic property of all dynamic proteins? , 2004, Proteins.

[9]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Catalysis by dihydrofolate reductase and other enzymes arises from electrostatic preorganization, not conformational motions , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  José N Onuchic,et al.  The shadow map: a general contact definition for capturing the dynamics of biomolecular folding and function. , 2012, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[11]  J Andrew McCammon,et al.  Mapping the nucleotide and isoform-dependent structural and dynamical features of Ras proteins. , 2008, Structure.

[12]  Ian R Kleckner,et al.  An introduction to NMR-based approaches for measuring protein dynamics. , 2011, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[13]  J. Koblinski,et al.  Prolyl isomerase cyclophilin A regulation of Janus-activated kinase 2 and the progression of human breast cancer. , 2008, Cancer research.

[14]  V. Hilser,et al.  The ensemble nature of allostery , 2014, Nature.

[15]  A. Kohen Enzyme Dynamics: Consensus and Controversy , 2012 .

[16]  L. Kay,et al.  A heteronuclear correlation experiment for simultaneous determination of 15N longitudinal decay and chemical exchange rates of systems in slow equilibrium , 1994, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[17]  Tongye Shen,et al.  Mapping allostery through computational glycine scanning and correlation analysis of residue-residue contacts. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[18]  Z. Luthey-Schulten,et al.  Experimental and computational determination of tRNA dynamics , 2010, FEBS letters.

[19]  M. Karplus,et al.  Dynamics of folded proteins , 1977, Nature.

[20]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Resolving the complex role of enzyme conformational dynamics in catalytic function , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  John Karanicolas,et al.  The structural basis for biphasic kinetics in the folding of the WW domain from a formin-binding protein: Lessons for protein design? , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Donald Hamelberg,et al.  Cyclophilin A Inhibition: Targeting Transition-State-Bound Enzyme Conformations for Structure-Based Drug Design , 2013, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[23]  E. Eisenmesser,et al.  Structure and Dynamics of GeoCyp: A Thermophilic Cyclophilin with a Novel Substrate Binding Mechanism That Functions Efficiently at Low Temperatures. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[24]  Guohui Li,et al.  What is so special about Arg 55 in the catalysis of cyclophilin A? insights from hybrid QM/MM simulations. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[25]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  The catalytic effect of dihydrofolate reductase and its mutants is determined by reorganization energies. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[26]  D. Hamelberg,et al.  Reoptimization of the AMBER force field parameters for peptide bond (Omega) torsions using accelerated molecular dynamics. , 2009, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[27]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[28]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  Enzyme millisecond conformational dynamics do not catalyze the chemical step , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  S. Vishveshwara,et al.  A network representation of protein structures: implications for protein stability. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[30]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein allostery, signal transmission and dynamics: a classification scheme of allosteric mechanisms , 2009, Molecular bioSystems.

[31]  V. Hornak,et al.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters , 2006, Proteins.

[32]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water , 1983 .

[33]  Jeff Tian,et al.  A Mechanistic Understanding of Allosteric Immune Escape Pathways in the HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[34]  E. Eisenmesser,et al.  Characterizing and controlling the inherent dynamics of cyclophilin‐A , 2009, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[35]  G. Fischer,et al.  Insights into the catalytic mechanism of peptidyl prolyl cis/trans isomerases. , 2004, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[36]  Arieh Warshel,et al.  At the dawn of the 21st century: Is dynamics the missing link for understanding enzyme catalysis? , 2010, Proteins.

[37]  D. Kern,et al.  Kinetic analysis of cyclophilin-catalyzed prolyl cis/trans isomerization by dynamic NMR spectroscopy. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[38]  E. Eisenmesser,et al.  Determination of the Full Catalytic Cycle among Multiple Cyclophilin Family Members and Limitations on the Application of CPMG-RD in Reversible Catalytic Systems. , 2015, Biochemistry.

[39]  L. Nicholson,et al.  Prolyl cis-trans isomerization as a molecular timer. , 2007, Nature chemical biology.

[40]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Multiple conformational selection and induced fit events take place in allosteric propagation. , 2014, Biophysical chemistry.

[41]  Hak-Sung Kim,et al.  Protein conformational dynamics dictate the binding affinity for a ligand , 2014, Nature Communications.

[42]  L. Kavraki,et al.  Multiscale characterization of protein conformational ensembles , 2009, Proteins.

[43]  D. Hamelberg,et al.  Conformational plasticity of an enzyme during catalysis: intricate coupling between cyclophilin A dynamics and substrate turnover. , 2013, Biophysical journal.

[44]  M. Karplus,et al.  A hierarchy of timescales in protein dynamics is linked to enzyme catalysis , 2007, Nature.

[45]  Wei Li,et al.  A Dynamic Knockout Reveals That Conformational Fluctuations Influence the Chemical Step of Enzyme Catalysis , 2011, Science.

[46]  D. Hamelberg,et al.  The dilemma of conformational dynamics in enzyme catalysis: perspectives from theory and experiment. , 2014, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[47]  G. Ciccotti,et al.  Numerical Integration of the Cartesian Equations of Motion of a System with Constraints: Molecular Dynamics of n-Alkanes , 1977 .

[48]  W. Sundquist,et al.  Structural insights into the catalytic mechanism of cyclophilin A , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[49]  E. J. Loveridge,et al.  Evidence that a 'dynamic knockout' in Escherichia coli dihydrofolate reductase does not affect the chemical step of catalysis. , 2012, Nature chemistry.

[50]  Guido Scarabelli,et al.  Mapping the Structural and Dynamical Features of Kinesin Motor Domains , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Allosteric networks in thrombin distinguish procoagulant vs. anticoagulant activities , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  J. Klinman Importance of protein dynamics during enzymatic C-H bond cleavage catalysis. , 2013, Biochemistry.

[53]  D. A. Bosco,et al.  Enzyme Dynamics During Catalysis , 2002, Science.

[54]  J. Mccammon,et al.  Mechanistic Insight into the Role of Transition-State Stabilization in Cyclophilin A , 2008, Journal of the American Chemical Society.