In vitro drug sensitivity testing can predict induction failure and early relapse of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

It is vital to develop effective therapy for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), in whom no remission occurs or who suffer relapse with current protocols. Cellular drug resistance is thought to be an important cause of induction failure and relapse. We performed in vitro tests of bone marrow samples in 196 children with newly diagnosed ALL with a 4-day culture and a methyl-thiazol-tetrazolium assay. We tested 16 drugs and calculated the 70% lethal dose (LD70) for 14 drugs and the leukemic cell survival (LCS) rate for dexamethasone and prednisolone. For each single drug, patients were classified into two groups, sensitive or resistant, by median concentration of LD70 or LCS. When patients were classified into three groups by sensitivity to four drugs of DPAV (dexamethasone, prednisolone, L-asparaginase, and vincristine), 3-year event-free survival (EFS; 95% confidence intervals) of the super sensitive group (SS; sensitive to all 4 drugs) was 0.833 (0.690 to 0.976), that of the intermediate sensitive group (IS; sensitive to 2 or 3 drugs) was 0.735 (0.609 to 0.863), and that of the relatively resistant group (RR; sensitive to no drugs or to 1 drug) was 0.541 (0.411 to 0.670; P = .0008). We then investigated the relationship between the above four-drug sensitivity and the time of relapse. The SS and IS patients tended to maintain continuous complete remission, and RR patients tended to undergo induction failure and early and late relapse (P = .004). Initial white blood cell count, immunologic classification, and age were also predictive factors, but the patient numbers showed no statistical correlation between these factors and the four-drug sensitivity groups (SS, IS, and RR). When we took three groups SS/IS/RR and investigated the EFS for various clinical groups, DPAV sensitivity strongly influenced EFS in the standard-risk ALL (P = .016). In vitro drug sensitivity testing provides additional prognostic information about childhood ALL, and early detection of drug resistance at the time chemotherapy commences may provide a successful strategy for individualizing treatment, as the results indicate de novo resistance to front-line drugs and suggest alternative, second-line drugs.

[1]  R. Pieters,et al.  Favorable prognosis of hyperdiploid common acute lymphoblastic leukemia may be explained by sensitivity to antimetabolites and other drugs: results of an in vitro study. , 1995, Blood.

[2]  R. Pieters,et al.  Topoisomerase II alpha gene expression in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1995, Leukemia.

[3]  C. Taylor,et al.  Appraisal of the MTT assay as a rapid test of chemosensitivity in acute myeloid leukaemia. , 1989, British Journal of Cancer.

[4]  T. Hongo,et al.  In vitro chemosensitivity of lymphoblasts at relapse in childhood leukemia using the MTT assay. , 1991, International journal of hematology.

[5]  R. Pieters,et al.  Relation of 5'-nucleotidase and phosphatase activities with immunophenotype, drug resistance and clinical prognosis in childhood leukemia. , 1992, Leukemia research.

[6]  K. Weinberg,et al.  Clinical importance of myeloid-antigen expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia of childhood. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Relation of cellular drug resistance to long-term clinical outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia , 1991, The Lancet.

[8]  C. Pui Medical progress : childhood leukemias , 1995 .

[9]  C. Pui,et al.  Biology and treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia , 1994 .

[10]  R. Pieters,et al.  In vitro cellular drug resistance in children with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1995, Blood.

[11]  A. G. Bosanquet,et al.  Long‐term comparison of results of a drug sensitivity assay in vitro with patient response in lymphatic neoplasms , 1988, Cancer.

[12]  T. Hongo,et al.  An in vitro chemosensitivity test for the screening of anti‐cancer drugs in childhood leukemia , 1990, Cancer.

[13]  R. Pieters,et al.  In vitro drug sensitivity of cells from children with leukemia using the MTT assay with improved culture conditions , 1990 .

[14]  R. Pieters,et al.  Different cellular drug resistance profiles in childhood lymphoblastic and non-lymphoblastic leukemia: a preliminary report. , 1994, Leukemia.

[15]  A. G. Bosanquet Correlations between therapeutic response of leukaemias and in-vitro drug-sensitivity assay , 1991, The Lancet.

[16]  T. Mosmann Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. , 1983, Journal of immunological methods.

[17]  R. Pieters,et al.  Cellular drug resistance profiles that might explain the prognostic value of immunophenotype and age in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. , 1993, Leukemia.

[18]  M. Luscombe,et al.  A study of some variables in a tetrazolium dye (MTT) based assay for cell growth and chemosensitivity. , 1987, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  S. Cole,et al.  Use of the MTT assay for rapid determination of chemosensitivity of human leukemic blast cells. , 1988, Leukemia research.

[20]  I. Viano,et al.  In vitro chemosensitivity testing of leukemic cells: Prediction of response to chemotherapy in patients with acute non‐lymphocytic leukemia , 1989, Hematological oncology.