Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force

Potential variables that underlie variation in flake size, and in some instances shape, are investigated in a newly designed experiment. This new design, which utilizes glass cores molded to a specific shape, results in flakes that are identical to archaeological ones. Variation in exterior platform angle, platform depth and angle of blow all directly affect flake size, and in the case of exterior platform angle, flake shape as well (in spite of constant core surface morphology). In treating velocity and force independently, neither is found to affect flake size or shape. These results have implications for understanding different strategies that flintknappers may employ to control the size of their flake products.

[1]  Steven L. Kuhn,et al.  The Trouble with Ham Steaks: A Reply to Morrow , 1996, American Antiquity.

[2]  William Andrefsky,et al.  Lithic Debitage: Context, Form, Meaning , 2001 .

[3]  Hansjürgen Müller-Beck,et al.  A History of Flint-Knapping Experimentation, 1838-1976 [and Comments and Reply] , 1978, Current Anthropology.

[4]  George C. Frison,et al.  Experimental Use of Clovis Weaponry and Tools on African Elephants , 1989, American Antiquity.

[5]  Andrew W. Pelcin The Threshold Effect of Platform Width: A Reply to Davis and Shea , 1998 .

[6]  J. Jeffrey Flenniken,et al.  Morphological Projectile Point Typology: Replication Experimentation and Technological Analysis , 1986, American Antiquity.

[7]  Stanley A. Ahler,et al.  Mass Analysis of Flaking Debris: Studying the Forest Rather Than the Tree , 2008 .

[8]  Andrew W. Pelcin The Formation of Flakes: The Role of Platform Thickness and Exterior Platform Angle in the Production of Flake Initiations and Terminations , 1997 .

[9]  Jeffrey J Flenniken,et al.  The Past, Present, and Future of Flintknapping: An Anthropological Perspective , 1984 .

[10]  George C Frison Observations on the use of stone tools: dulling of working edges of some chipped stone tools in bison butchering , 1979 .

[11]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .

[12]  Earl Herbert Swanson,et al.  An introduction to flintworking , 1972 .

[13]  D E Crabtree Flaking Stone with Wooden Implements , 1970, Science.

[14]  Daniel S. Amick,et al.  An Evaluation of Debitage Produced by Experimental Bifacial Core Reduction of a Georgetown Chert Nodule , 1988 .

[15]  Thomas R. Hester,et al.  Lithic use-wear analysis , 1982, American Antiquity.

[16]  John D Speth,et al.  Experimental investigation of hard-hammer percussion flaking , 1974 .

[17]  Zachary J. Davis,et al.  Experimental Tests of Middle Palaeolithic Spear Points Using a Calibrated Crossbow , 2001 .

[18]  D. Crabtree Stoneworker's Approach To Analyzing and Replicating the Lindenmeirer Folsom , 1966 .

[19]  J. Speth Mechanical Basis of Percussion Flaking , 1972, American Antiquity.

[20]  Don E. Crabtree,et al.  The Corbiac blade technique and other experiments , 1969 .

[21]  N. Rolland,et al.  The Interpretation of Middle Palaeolithic Variability , 1981 .

[22]  G. Odell Butchering with stone tools: some experimental results , 1980 .

[23]  R. Butler,et al.  Notes on experiments in flint knapping. 1. Heat treatment of silica materials , 1964 .

[24]  William Andrefsky,et al.  A Consideration of Blade and Flake Curvature , 1986 .

[25]  D. Crabtree Mesoamerican Polyhedral Cores and Prismatic Blades , 1968, American Antiquity.

[26]  John D. Speth,et al.  Miscellaneous Studies in Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking: The Effects of Oblique Impact , 1975, American Antiquity.

[27]  André Debénath,et al.  Handbook of paleolithic typology , 1993 .

[28]  F. Bordes,et al.  Étude comprative des différentes techniques de taille du silex et des roches dures , 1947 .

[29]  Raymond Mauldin,et al.  Experiments in Lithic Technology , 1989 .

[30]  Andrew W. Pelcin The Effect of Core Surface Morphology on Flake Attributes: Evidence from a Controlled Experiment , 1997 .

[31]  George H. Odell,et al.  Stone Tool Research at the End of the Millennium: Procurement and Technology , 2000 .

[32]  H. Dibble Platform Variability and Flake Morphology: A Comparison of Experimental and Archaeological Data and Implications for Interpreting Prehistoric Lithic Technological Strategies , 1997 .

[33]  Christopher A Bergman,et al.  Experimental studies in the determination of flaking mode , 1982 .

[34]  B. Cotterell,et al.  The Formation of Flakes , 1987, American Antiquity.

[35]  John C. Whittaker,et al.  Flintknapping: Making and Understanding Stone Tools , 1994 .

[36]  Steven L. Kuhn,et al.  A Formal Approach to the Design and Assembly of Mobile Toolkits , 1994, American Antiquity.

[37]  H. Dibble,et al.  New experimental evidence on the relation between percussion flaking and flake variation , 1981 .

[38]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  The Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas (France) , 1995 .

[39]  L. Meignen L'abri des Canalettes : un habitat moustérien sur les grands Causses (Nant, Aveyron), fouilles 1980-1986 , 1993 .

[40]  Richard T. Will A Tale of Two Flint-Knappers: Implications for Lithic Debitage Studies in Northeastern North America , 2000 .

[41]  G. Odell,et al.  Alternative Approaches to Lithic Analysis , 1990 .

[42]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Production and Transport of Blanks and Tools at the French Middle Paleolithic Site of Combe-Capelle Bas , 1998, American Antiquity.

[43]  Bruce B. Hackell Of Chipped Stone Tools, Elephants and the Clovis Hunters: An Experiment , 1979 .

[44]  J. Speth The Role of Platform Angle and Core Size in Hard-Hammer Percussion Flaking , 1981 .

[45]  Chen Shen,et al.  A Preliminary Study of the Anvil-Chipping Technique: Experiments and Evaluations , 2000 .