Buccal cell DNA yield, quality, and collection costs: comparison of methods for large-scale studies.

There is considerable interest in noninvasive and cost-effective methods for obtaining DNA in large-scale studies. In this randomized crossover study of 22 participants, we compared the DNA yield, quality, and associated costs of buccal cell DNA collected using cytobrushes (three brushes per collection) and swish (i.e., mouthwash) in self-administered procedures. There was a nonstatistically significant higher yield from the mouthwash compared with cytobrush collections (15.8 microg versus 12.0 microg, respectively; P = 0.53). PCR reactions that required short (0.3 kb) or intermediate (1.1 kb) DNA fragments were 100% successful for DNA from brush and mouthwash, whereas PCRs for reactions that required long fragments (7.8 kb) failed for all of the participants from cytobrush DNA and were 81% successful for DNA from the mouthwash source. The brush collections provided sufficient DNA for an estimated 150-225 PCR reactions requiring short and intermediate DNA fragments. The estimated per person costs for buccal brush DNA collections in large studies were less then half (8.50 dollars) those for the mouthwash method (18 dollars). In addition, we tested whether cytobrush instructions to rub cheeks before collection or collect cells only in the morning increased DNA yield and whether repeat brushings of the same cheek reduced DNA yield. These variations resulted in no significant differences in DNA yields. We conclude that the collection of DNA with cytobrushes using simple instructions is cost effective in large-scale studies, and yields sufficient quantity and quality of DNA for genotyping.

[1]  D. Tkach,et al.  Use of buccal cells collected in mouthwash as a source of DNA for clinical testing. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[2]  M. Thun,et al.  Determinants of DNA yield and quality from buccal cell samples collected with mouthwash. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[3]  C. Ulrich,et al.  Epoxide hydrolase Tyr113His polymorphism is associated with elevated risk of colorectal polyps in the presence of smoking and high meat intake. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[4]  A M Nomura,et al.  Feasibility of collecting buccal cell DNA by mail in a cohort study. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[5]  K. Buetow,et al.  Collection of genomic DNA from adults in epidemiological studies by buccal cytobrush and mouthwash. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[6]  J. Wiencke,et al.  Whole genome amplification increases the efficiency and validity of buccal cell genotyping in pediatric populations. , 2001, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[7]  L. Le Marchand,et al.  A simple mouthwash method for obtaining genomic DNA in molecular epidemiological studies. , 1998, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[8]  J. Potter,et al.  Determination of human NAT2 acetylator genotype by oligonucleotide ligation assay. , 1997, BioTechniques.

[9]  O Pelkonen,et al.  A genetic polymorphism in coumarin 7-hydroxylation: sequence of the human CYP2A genes and identification of variant CYP2A6 alleles. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[10]  K. Klinger,et al.  Multiplex PCR amplification from the CFTR gene using DNA prepared from buccal brushes/swabs. , 1993, Human molecular genetics.

[11]  T. Cate,et al.  Oral histology: Development, structure, and function , 1980 .