Physicians' experiences and beliefs regarding informal consultation.

CONTEXT Efforts to control medical expenses by emphasizing primary care and limiting specialty care may influence how physicians use informal or "curbside" consultation. OBJECTIVE To understand physicians' use of and beliefs about informal consultation. DESIGN Survey mailed in July 1997. PARTICIPANTS Of a random sample of Massachusetts general internists, pediatricians, cardiologists, orthopedic surgeons (n=300 each), and infectious disease specialists (n=200) surveyed, 1225 were eligible and 705 (58%) responded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Self-reported use of and beliefs about informal consultation. RESULTS Generalist physicians requested more informal consultations than specialists (median, 3 vs 1 per week; P<.001) and were asked to provide fewer (2 vs 5 per week; P<.001). In multivariate analyses, physicians in a health maintenance organization, multispecialty group, or single-specialty group requested more informal consultations than those in solo practice (82%, 40%, and 28% more, respectively; all P<.001) and were more often asked to provide them (43%, 63%, and 14% more, respectively; all P<.05). Physicians with at least 30% of their income from capitation requested 38% more and were asked to provide 46% more informal consultations than those with little or no income from capitation (both P<.001). Generalists' overall approval of informal consultation was greater than specialists' (mean 5.9 vs 5.1 on a 7-point Likert scale; P<.001), and approval was strongly associated with beliefs about how informal consultation affects quality of care (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS Use of informal consultation is common, varies by specialty, practice setting, and capitation, and therefore may increase with current trends toward group practice and managed care. Because overall approval of informal consultation is strongly associated with beliefs about how it affects quality of care, this issue should be carefully considered by physicians who participate in informal consultation.

[1]  R. Brook,et al.  Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. Are they compatible? , 1989, JAMA.

[2]  R. Hays,et al.  Managed Care and Capitation in California: How Do Physicians at Financial Risk Control Their Own Utilization? , 1995, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[3]  L. Casalino,et al.  Vertical integration and organizational networks in health care. , 1996, Health affairs.

[4]  S. Pearson,et al.  Informal consultations provided to general internists by the gastroenterology department of an HMO , 1998, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[5]  M. Hartog.  Medical Outpatients , 1988, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London.

[6]  Curbside consultation in endocrine practice: A prospective observational study , 1996 .

[7]  A. Hillman.  Financial incentives for physicians in HMOs. Is there a conflict of interest? , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  F A Manian,et al.  Curbside consultations. A closer look at a common practice. , 1996, JAMA.

[9]  D A Asch,et al.  Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  A. D. Weinberg,et al.  Informal advice- and information-seeking between physicians. , 1981, Journal of medical education.

[11]  A. Hillman,et al.  Financial Incentives for Physicians in HMOs , 1987 .

[12]  C. Huttin,et al.  The use of clinical guidelines to improve medical practice: main issues in the United States. , 1997, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[13]  J. Kassirer.  Access to specialty care. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  D. McKinsey,et al.  A prospective study of 2,092 "curbside" questions asked of two infectious disease consultants in private practice in the midwest. , 1996, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.