Determinants of Corporate R&D Investment: An Empirical Study Comparing Korea's IT Industry with Its Non‐IT Industry

In our study, we extracted the market, finance, and government factors determining R&D investment of individual firms in the IT industry in Korea. We collected the financial data of 515 individual firms belonging to IT and non-IT industries between 1980 and 1999 from the Korea Investors Service’s database and investigated the empirical relationship between the factors using an ordinary regression model, a fixed effects model, and a random effects model. The main findings of our study are as follows: i) The Herfindahl Index variable representing the degree of market concentration is statistically insignificant in explaining R&D expenditures in the IT manufacturing industry. ii) Assets, which is used as a proxy variable for firm size, have a positive and statistically significant coefficient. These two results suggest that the Schumpeterian Hypothesis may be only partially applied to the IT manufacturing industry in Korea. iii) The dividend variable has a negative value and is statistically significant, indicating that a tendency of high dividends can restrict the internal cash flow for R&D investment. iv) The sales variable representing growth potential shows a positive coefficient. v) The subsidy as a proxy variable for governmental R&D promotion policies is positively correlated with R&D expenditure. This suggests that government policy has played a significant role in promoting R&D activities of IT firms in Korea since 1980. vi) Using a dummy variable, we verified that firms reduced their R&D investments to secure sufficient liquidity under the restructuring pressure during Korea’s 1998 and 1999 economic crisis.

[1]  D. Scharfstein,et al.  Corporate Structure, Liquidity, and Investment: Evidence from Japanese Industrial Groups , 1991 .

[2]  Sanjay Kallapur,et al.  The Association Between Investment Opportunity Set Proxies and Realized Growth , 1999 .

[3]  Do subsidies to cooperative R & D actually stimulate R & D investment and cooperation? , 1995 .

[4]  Robert A. Connolly,et al.  R&D, Market Structure, and Profits: A Value-Based Approach , 1984 .

[5]  Sanjai Bhagat,et al.  Corporate research & development investments international comparisons , 1995 .

[6]  Henry G. Grabowski,et al.  The Determinants of Industrial Research and Development: A Study of the Chemical, Drug, and Petroleum Industries , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Adrian Pagan,et al.  The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics , 1980 .

[8]  H. Kruiniger On the Estimation of Panel Regression Models with Fixed Effects , 2002 .

[9]  J. Gilman,et al.  Determining the Optimum Level for R&D Spending , 1986 .

[10]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[11]  F. Scherer Research and Development Resource Allocation Under Rivalry , 1967 .

[12]  E. Reynard,et al.  A Method for Relating Research Spending to Net Profits , 1979 .

[13]  B. Wahlroos,et al.  R & D intensity with endogenous concentration evidence for finland , 1982 .

[14]  William Fellner,et al.  The Influence of Market Structure on Technological Progress , 1951 .

[15]  Tchanghee Hyun Hyun,et al.  The evolution of Korean Information Infrastructure and its future direction : A system dynamics model , 1998 .

[16]  Wesley M. Cohen,et al.  Empirical studies of innovation and market structure , 1989 .

[17]  Steven M. Fazzari,et al.  Asymmetric Information, Financing Constraints, and Investment , 1987 .