Motor imagery of foot dorsiflexion and gait: Effects on corticospinal excitability

OBJECTIVE We examined how corticospinal excitability was affected by motor imagery of foot dorsiflexion and motor imagery of gait. METHODS Transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied over the primary motor cortex of 16 young healthy subjects while they performed imaginary foot dorsiflexions (Experiment I) and imaginary walking (Experiment II). Motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the tibialis anterior (TA) and first dorsal interosseus (FDI). MEPs recorded during motor imagery were compared to those recorded during a matched visual imagery task. RESULTS Imagined foot dorsiflexions increased MEP areas in both TA and FDI. The increase in TA was stronger than in FDI. Overall, imagined walking did not change MEP areas. However, subjects with larger increases in TA during imagined foot dorsiflexion also showed larger increases in TA during imagined walking. CONCLUSIONS Imagined foot dorsiflexions increase corticospinal excitability in both a task-related muscle (TA) and a task-unrelated muscle (FDI), with larger increases in the task-related muscle. Imagined gait only increases corticospinal excitability in those subjects with the largest increments during imagined foot dorsiflexion. SIGNIFICANCE Imagery of a simple lower extremity movement evokes increases in corticospinal excitability. Furthermore, corticospinal effects of a simple motor imagery task can predict corticospinal effects of a more complex motor imagery task involving the same muscle.

[1]  Katiuscia Sacco,et al.  Motor imagery of walking following training in locomotor attention. The effect of ‘the tango lesson’ , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  K. Jellinger.  Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[3]  J. A. Stevens,et al.  Interference effects demonstrate distinct roles for visual and motor imagery during the mental representation of human action , 2005, Cognition.

[4]  M. Schieppati,et al.  The excitability of the human motor cortex increases during execution and mental imagination of sequential but not repetitive finger movements , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  I. Toni,et al.  Motor imagery: A window into the mechanisms and alterations of the motor system , 2008, Cortex.

[6]  D. Armstrong.  The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. , 1988, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  M Hallett,et al.  Focal enhancement of motor cortex excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2002, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[8]  Sally Potter,et al.  The Tango Lesson , 1998 .

[9]  E. Wassermann,et al.  Visual deprivation effects on human motor cortex excitability , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  M. Diamond,et al.  Primary Motor and Sensory Cortex Activation during Motor Performance and Motor Imagery: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Winston D. Byblow,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability and intracortical inhibition during motor imagery is task-dependent , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  J. C. Rothwell,et al.  Dynamic changes in corticospinal excitability during motor imagery , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  B. Bussel,et al.  Evidence for a spinal stepping generator in man , 1996, Paraplegia.

[14]  F. Baldissera,et al.  Excitability changes in resting forearm muscles during voluntary foot movements depend on hand position: a neural substrate for hand–foot isodirectional coupling , 2004, Brain Research.

[15]  C. Richards,et al.  Brain activations during motor imagery of locomotor‐related tasks: A PET study , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[16]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Investigating human motor control by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  M. Jeannerod.  The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery , 1994, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  K. Hiraoka.  IMAGINING STUMBLING INHIBITS MOTOR-EVOKED POTENTIALS IN THE SOLEUS MUSCLE , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.

[19]  J Paillard,et al.  Vision without proprioception modulates cortico-spinal excitability during hand motor imagery. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  L. Craighero,et al.  The influence of hand posture on corticospinal excitability during motor imagery: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2004, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  A. Zwinderman,et al.  Correction for the influence of background muscle activity on stretch reflex amplitudes , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[22]  L. Craighero,et al.  Corticospinal excitability is specifically modulated by motor imagery: a magnetic stimulation study , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  S. Aglioti,et al.  Influence of imagined posture and imagery modality on corticospinal excitability , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral Processes Related to Visuomotor Imagery and Generation of Simple Finger Movements Studied with Positron Emission Tomography , 1998, NeuroImage.

[26]  Anne R. Isaac,et al.  An instrument for assessing imagery of movement: The Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire (VMIQ). , 1986 .

[27]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Corticospinal facilitation during first and third person imagery , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[28]  F. Tremblay,et al.  Modulation of corticospinal excitability during imagined knee movements. , 2001, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[29]  T. Kasai,et al.  Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery , 1997, Brain Research.

[30]  Patrick Ragert,et al.  Contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation to the understanding of cortical mechanisms involved in motor control , 2008, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  K. Kubota,et al.  Cortical Mapping of Gait in Humans: A Near-Infrared Spectroscopic Topography Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[32]  A. Curt,et al.  Corticospinal input in human gait: modulation of magnetically evoked motor responses , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Cerebral correlates of motor imagery of normal and precision gait , 2008, NeuroImage.

[34]  P. Jacobs,et al.  Involuntary stepping after chronic spinal cord injury. Evidence for a central rhythm generator for locomotion in man. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[35]  S Rossi,et al.  Corticospinal excitability modulation to hand muscles during movement imagery. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  J. Hochstenbach,et al.  Motor imagery: the relation between age and imagery capacity. , 2007, Human movement science.

[37]  P. Cavallari,et al.  Breakdown of inhibitory effects induced by foot motor imagery on hand motor area in lower-limb amputees , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Possible involvement of primary motor cortex in mentally simulated movement: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[39]  B. R. Bloem,et al.  Recent advances in functional neuroimaging of gait , 2007, Journal of Neural Transmission.

[40]  F. P. de Lange,et al.  Motor imagery of gait: a quantitative approach , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  J. Nielsen,et al.  Suppression of EMG activity by transcranial magnetic stimulation in human subjects during walking , 2001, The Journal of physiology.

[42]  H. Siebner,et al.  Effector‐independent representations of simple and complex imagined finger movements: a combined fMRI and TMS study , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[43]  C. W. Hess,et al.  Magnetic stimulation of the human brain: Facilitation of motor responses by voluntary contraction of ipsilateral and contralateral muscles with additional observations on an amputee , 1986, Neuroscience Letters.

[44]  V. Dietz.  Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.