How sorption-induced matrix deformation affects gas flow in coal seams: A new FE model

Abstract The influence of sorption-induced coal matrix deformation on the evolution of porosity and permeability of fractured coal seams is evaluated, together with its influence on gas recovery rates. The porosity-based model considers factors such as the volume occupied by the free-phase gas, the volume occupied by the adsorbed phase gas, the deformation-induced pore volume change, and the sorption-induced coal pore volume change. More importantly, these factors are quantified under in situ stress conditions. A cubic relation between coal porosity and permeability is introduced to relate the coal storage capability (changing porosity) to the coal transport property (changing permeability). A general porosity and permeability model is then implemented into a coupled gas flow and coal deformation finite element model. The new FE model was used to compare the performance of the new model with that of the Palmer–Mansoori model. It is found that the Palmer–Mansoori model may produce significant errors if loading conditions deviate from the assumptions of the uniaxial strain condition and infinite bulk modulus of the grains. The FE model was also applied to quantify the net change in permeability, the gas flow, and the resultant deformation in a coal seam. Model results demonstrate that the evolution of porosity and of permeability is controlled by the competing influences of effective stresses and sorption-based volume changes. The resulting sense of permeability change is controlled by the dominant mechanism.

[1]  Dong Yang,et al.  Nonlinear Coupled Mathematical Model for Solid Deformation and Gas Seepage in Fractured Media , 2004 .

[2]  John A. Hudson,et al.  Comprehensive rock engineering , 1993 .

[3]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[4]  Yangsheng Zhao,et al.  Mathematical model for coupled solid deformation and methane flow in coal seams , 1994 .

[5]  Yasuo Yabe,et al.  International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences , 1964, Nature.

[6]  Somasundaram Valliappan,et al.  Numerical modelling of methane gas migration in dry coal seams , 1996 .

[7]  Younane N. Abousleiman,et al.  Dual-porosity poroelastic modeling of generalized plane strain , 1999 .

[8]  Satya Harpalani,et al.  Measurement of parameters impacting methane recovery from coal seams , 1990 .

[9]  Roger Beckie,et al.  Flow of Coal-Bed Methane to a Gallery , 2000 .

[10]  I. Gray,et al.  Reservoir Engineering in Coal Seams: Part 1-The Physical Process of Gas Storage and Movement in Coal Seams , 1987 .

[11]  A. Cheng,et al.  Fundamentals of Poroelasticity , 1993 .

[12]  A. Saghafi,et al.  CO2 storage and gas diffusivity properties of coals from Sydney Basin, Australia , 2007 .

[13]  Derek Elsworth,et al.  Numerical modelling of coupled flow and deformation in fractured rock specimens , 1999 .

[14]  Eric P. Robertson,et al.  Modeling Permeability in Coal Using Sorption-Induced Strain Data , 2005 .

[15]  Guoliang Chen,et al.  Influence of gas production induced volumetric strain on permeability of coal , 1997 .

[16]  Christopher R. Clarkson,et al.  The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions , 1999 .

[17]  Chongbin Zhao,et al.  Numerical modelling of mass transport problems in porous media : a review , 1994 .

[18]  Ian D. Palmer,et al.  How Permeability Depends on Stress and Pore Pressure in Coalbeds: A New Model , 1998 .

[19]  R. Marc Bustin,et al.  Volumetric strain associated with methane desorption and its impact on coalbed gas production from deep coal seams , 2005 .

[20]  C. Tsang,et al.  A study of caprock hydromechanical changes associated with CO2-injection into a brine formation , 2002 .

[21]  Neil Sherwood,et al.  The influence of petrological properties and burial history on coal seam methane reservoir characterisation, Sydney Basin, Australia , 2007 .

[22]  Sevket Durucan,et al.  Drawdown Induced Changes in Permeability of Coalbeds: A New Interpretation of the Reservoir Response to Primary Recovery , 2004 .

[23]  W. Godwin Article in Press , 2000 .

[24]  John R. Seidle,et al.  Experimental Measurement of Coal Matrix Shrinkage Due to Gas Desorption and Implications for Cleat Permeability Increases , 1995 .

[25]  J. P. Seidle,et al.  Application of Matchstick Geometry To Stress Dependent Permeability in Coals , 1992 .

[26]  Richard L. Christiansen,et al.  A Permeability Model for Coal and Other Fractured, Sorptive-Elastic Media , 2008 .