The molecular logic for planarian regeneration along the anterior–posterior axis

The planarian Dugesia japonica can regenerate a complete individual from a head, trunk or tail fragment via activation of somatic pluripotent stem cells. About a century ago, Thomas Hunt Morgan attempted to explain the extraordinary regenerative ability of planarians by positing two opposing morphogenetic gradients of formative “head stuff” and “tail stuff” along the anterior–posterior axis. However, Morgan’s hypothesis remains open to debate. Here we show that extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathways establish a solid framework for planarian regeneration. Our data suggest that ERK signalling forms a spatial gradient in the anterior region during regeneration. The fibroblast growth factor receptor-like gene nou-darake (which serves as an output of ERK signalling in the differentiating head) and posteriorly biased β-catenin activity negatively regulate ERK signalling along the anterior–posterior axis in distinct manners, and thereby posteriorize regenerating tissues outside the head region to reconstruct a complete head-to-tail axis. On the basis of this knowledge about D. japonica, we proposed that β-catenin signalling is responsible for the lack of head-regenerative ability of tail fragments in the planarian Phagocata kawakatsui, and our confirmation thereof supports the notion that posterior β-catenin signalling negatively modulates the ERK signalling involved in anteriorization across planarian species. These findings suggest that ERK signalling has a pivotal role in triggering globally dynamic differentiation of stem cells in a head-to-tail sequence through a default program that promotes head tissue specification in the absence of posteriorizing signals. Thus, we have confirmed the broad outline of Morgan’s hypothesis, and refined it on the basis of our proposed default property of planarian stem cells.

[1]  David J. Forsthoefel,et al.  RNA interference by feeding in vitro–synthesized double‐stranded RNA to planarians: Methodology and dynamics , 2013, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[2]  K. Agata,et al.  A planarian orthopedia homolog is specifically expressed in the branch region of both the mature and regenerating brain , 1997, Development, growth & differentiation.

[3]  K. Agata,et al.  Brain regeneration from pluripotent stem cells in planarian , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  K. Yoshimoto,et al.  Reconstruction of dopaminergic neural network and locomotion function in planarian regenerates , 2007, Developmental neurobiology.

[5]  T. Nogi,et al.  Position‐specific and non‐colinear expression of the planarian posterior (Abdominal‐B‐like) gene , 2001, Development, growth & differentiation.

[6]  K. Agata,et al.  Morphological and Functional Recovery of the Planarian Photosensing System during Head Regeneration , 2004, Zoological science.

[7]  K. Agata,et al.  Regeneration‐dependent conditional gene knockdown (Readyknock) in planarian: Demonstration of requirement for Djsnap‐25 expression in the brain for negative phototactic behavior , 2007, Development, growth & differentiation.

[8]  K. Agata,et al.  Evolution and regeneration of the planarian central nervous system , 2009, Development, growth & differentiation.

[9]  K. Watanabe,et al.  Planaria FoxA (HNF3) homologue is specifically expressed in the pharynx-forming cells. , 2000, Gene.

[10]  A. Sánchez Alvarado,et al.  Double-stranded RNA specifically disrupts gene expression during planarian regeneration. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  P. Lawrence Background to bicoid , 1988, Cell.

[12]  Y. Saitoh,et al.  Intercalary regeneration in planarians , 2003, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[13]  Jochen C. Rink,et al.  β-Catenin Defines Head Versus Tail Identity During Planarian Regeneration and Homeostasis , 2008, Science.

[14]  Kazuho Ikeo,et al.  FGFR-related gene nou-darake restricts brain tissues to the head region of planarians , 2002, Nature.

[15]  Kiyokazu Agata,et al.  Ectopic pharynxes arise by regional reorganization after anterior/posterior chimera in planarians , 1999, Mechanisms of Development.

[16]  P. Reddien,et al.  A wound-induced Wnt expression program controls planarian regeneration polarity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Irving E. Wang,et al.  Clonogenic Neoblasts Are Pluripotent Adult Stem Cells That Underlie Planarian Regeneration , 2011, Science.

[18]  Kiyokazu Agata,et al.  ERK signaling controls blastema cell differentiation during planarian regeneration , 2011, Development.

[19]  K. Agata,et al.  Cellular and molecular dissection of pluripotent adult somatic stem cells in planarians , 2010, Development, growth & differentiation.

[20]  K. Agata,et al.  Survey of the differences between regenerative and non‐regenerative animals , 2012, Development, growth & differentiation.

[21]  K. Agata,et al.  Unifying principles of regeneration I: Epimorphosis versus morphallaxis , 2007, Development, growth & differentiation.

[22]  T. Morgan The control of heteromorphosis in Planaria maculata , 2005, Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen.

[23]  T. H. Morgan,et al.  “Polarity” considered as a phenomenon of gradation of materials , 1905 .

[24]  Kiyokazu Agata,et al.  Planarian Hedgehog/Patched establishes anterior–posterior polarity by regulating Wnt signaling , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  P. Reddien,et al.  Smed-βcatenin-1 Is Required for Anteroposterior Blastema Polarity in Planarian Regeneration , 2008, Science.