Safety and efficacy of first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab alternating with nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: the non-randomised, open-label, phase IIIb/IV CheckMate 920 trial

Objectives The non-randomised, open-label, phase IIIb/IV multicohort CheckMate 920 trial explored the safety and efficacy with a less frequent, but continual nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) dosing regimen (cohort 1) to determine whether this modification could potentially retain efficacy benefits while improving on the manageable safety profile previously observed with this combination in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). Setting Patients were enrolled from 48 largely community-based sites in the USA. Participants 106 patients with previously untreated, predominantly clear cell aRCC received treatment. Interventions Patients received NIVO 6 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg on day 1 of the first week of each 8-week cycle; the combination alternated with NIVO 480 mg monotherapy on day 1 of the fifth week of each 8-week cycle. Treatment continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent or study end. The maximum treatment duration was 2 years. The primary endpoint was the incidence of high-grade (grade 3/4 and grade 5) immune-mediated adverse events (IMAEs) within 100 days of the last dose. Select secondary endpoints included time to onset and resolution of high-grade IMAEs, progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR). The incidence of treatment-related adverse events and the overall survival (OS) were the exploratory endpoints. Results The most common grade 3/4 IMAEs were diarrhoea/colitis (7.5%) and rash (6.6%) and no grade 5 IMAEs occurred, with a minimum follow-up of 28.5 months. The median PFS was 4.8 (95% CI 3.0 to 8.3) months, the ORR in evaluable patients (n=96) was 34.4% (95% CI 25.0 to 44.8), and the median OS was not reached (95% CI 24.8 months to not estimable). Conclusions While no new safety signals were reported with less frequent, but continual NIVO+IPI dosing in CheckMate 920, the modified regimen was not associated with clinical benefits relative to the approved NIVO+IPI dose. These results support the continued use of the currently approved NIVO+IPI combination dosing schedule for patients with aRCC. Trial registration number NCT02982954.

[1]  M. Harrison,et al.  Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results from the phase 3b/4 CheckMate 920 trial , 2022, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[2]  J. Bendell,et al.  Safety and efficacy of nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with brain metastases: CheckMate 920 , 2021, Cancer.

[3]  N. Agarwal,et al.  A Prospective Multicenter Evaluation of Initial Treatment Choice in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Prior to the Immunotherapy Era: The MaRCC Registry Experience , 2021, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[4]  C. Porta,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 4-year follow-up of the phase III CheckMate 214 trial , 2020, ESMO Open.

[5]  T. Choueiri,et al.  Optimized Management of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Response-Based Phase II Study (OMNIVORE). , 2020, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Cathomas,et al.  716P Optimizing ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: SAKK 07/17 study , 2020 .

[7]  C. Porta,et al.  Survival outcomes and independent response assessment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: 42-month follow-up of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial , 2020, Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer.

[8]  M. Ornstein,et al.  Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Renal Cell Carcinoma: The Evidence to Date , 2020, Cancer management and research.

[9]  C. Porta,et al.  Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended follow-up of efficacy and safety results from a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[10]  Bohuslav Melichar,et al.  Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal‐Cell Carcinoma , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  William Abramovits,et al.  OPDIVO (Nivolumab). , 2015, Skinmed.

[12]  T. Choueiri,et al.  External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. , 2013, The Lancet. Oncology.

[13]  Wanling Xie,et al.  Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  Econor,et al.  ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS , 2002 .

[15]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[16]  S. Wyard,et al.  THE NATURAL DURATION OF CANCER , 1925, Canadian Medical Association journal.