Effects of teaching statistical laws on reasoning about everyday problems.

A long-standing belief is that statistical rules helpful in solving practical problems do not transfer beyond the subject matter domain in which they were learned. Recent research by G. T. Fong, D. H. Krantz, and R. E. Nisbett (1986) challenges this belief. Fong et al. showed that instructing learners about abstract rules, such as the law of large numbers, improved reasoning about ill-defined problems and transferred to solving everyday statistical problems that involved probabilistic relations. Fong et al.'s research is extended in 3 experiments with 276 university, secondary, and middle school students. The law-of-large-numbers heuristic was taught in regular classroom settings and students' abilities to solve ill-structured, everyday problems were tested. Students learned a good deal about how to reason statistically, and these gains generalized over different structures of problems and topics. The results support a revival of formalist views of transfer, that teaching formal rules about inference making can improve reasoning and support transfer

[1]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  REASONING AND A SENSE OF REALITY , 1972 .

[2]  R. Gagne Learnable aspects of problem solving , 1980 .

[3]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  Information-Processing Theory of Human Problem Solving , 1978 .

[4]  Richard Lempert,et al.  The Effects of Graduate Training on Reasoning: Formal Discipline and Thinking About Everyday-Life Events , 1988 .

[5]  Joel R. Levin,et al.  A controlled, powerful multiple-comparison strategy for several situations. , 1994 .

[6]  D. Perkins,et al.  Rocky Roads to Transfer: Rethinking Mechanism of a Neglected Phenomenon , 1989 .

[7]  Norman Frederiksen,et al.  Implications of Cognitive Theory for Instruction in Problem Solving , 1984 .

[8]  Douglas A. Grouws,et al.  Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning , 1992 .

[9]  Keith J. Holyoak,et al.  The cognitive basis of knowledge transfer. , 1987 .

[10]  D. Halpern Thought and Knowledge: An Introduction to Critical Thinking , 1995 .

[11]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[12]  Scott G. Paris,et al.  Models and metaphors of learning strategies. , 1988 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness , 1972 .

[14]  D. Perkins Postprimary Education Has Little Impact on Informal Reasoning. , 1985 .

[15]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic versus syntactic approaches to training deductive reasoning , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  K. Hopkins The Unit of Analysis: Group Means Versus Individual Observations , 1982 .

[17]  Keith J Holyoak,et al.  Pragmatic reasoning schemas , 1985, Cognitive Psychology.

[18]  S. Cormier,et al.  Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications. , 1987 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[20]  D. Krantz,et al.  The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[22]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  The Psychology of human thought , 1988 .

[23]  G. A. Miller,et al.  Book Review Nisbett, R. , & Ross, L.Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1980. , 1982 .

[24]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  The Teaching of Thinking , 1985 .

[25]  L. Resnick Education and Learning to Think , 1987 .

[26]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Learning and study strategies : issues in assessment, instruction, and evaluation , 1988 .

[27]  B. Foss New Horizons in Psychology 1 , 1966 .

[28]  Raymond S. Nickerson Reflections on Reasoning , 1986 .

[29]  John H. Holland,et al.  Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning, and Discovery , 1987, IEEE Expert.

[30]  F. Reif,et al.  Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research , 1980 .

[31]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Immediate and delayed transfer of training effects in statistical reasoning. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[32]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[33]  J. Shaughnessy Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. , 1992 .

[34]  Beau Jones,et al.  Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction , 1990 .

[35]  D. Krantz,et al.  The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[36]  W. Estes Human information processing , 1978 .

[37]  David H. Krantz,et al.  Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? , 1983, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.