Study on subjective quality assessment of Screen Content Images

With the coming age of big data, the cloud technology, referred to as the computations or applications through the Internet, is dramatically developed. The screen content has become one of the most common data form due to the extraordinary advance of network communication technology, and the JCT-VC has started to develop new standard focusing on improving the efficiency of screen content based on High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC). Nevertheless, the research on the quality assessment of screen content is still quite limited at the current stage. In this paper, we present a study on subjective quality assessment of the Screen Content Images (SCIs) and investigate whether the existing objective Image Quality Assessment (IQA) methods can effectively evaluate the quality of distorted SCIs. We construct a new Screen Content Database (SCD) including 24 source SCIs and 492 compressed ones with two codecs including HEVC as well as the HEVC extension. The Single Comparison (SC) method is employed for the subjective viewing to guarantee the reliability of the results. In our experiment, the correlations of eight popular IQA methods with the obtained Mean Opinion Score (MOS) values are evaluated. The result indicates that visual information fidelity method can achieve highest consistency with human visual perception.

[1]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[2]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[3]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Gradient Similarity , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[4]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[5]  Wen Gao,et al.  Perceptual Video Coding Based on SSIM-Inspired Divisive Normalization , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Information Content Weighting for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  D. Chandler Seven Challenges in Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Research , 2013 .

[8]  Baocai Yin,et al.  Screen Content Coding Based on HEVC Framework , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[9]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[10]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  ITU-T Rec. P.910 (04/2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications , 2009 .

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment , 2003, The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003.

[13]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Wen Gao,et al.  Content-aware layered compound video compression , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[16]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Image Retargeting Quality Assessment: A Study of Subjective Scores and Objective Metrics , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[17]  Wen Gao,et al.  SSIM-Motivated Rate-Distortion Optimization for Video Coding , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.