The network structure of city-firm relations

How are economic activities linked to geographic locations? To answer this question, we use a data-driven approach that builds on the information about location, ownership and economic activities of the world's 3,000 largest firms and their almost one million subsidiaries. From this information we generate a bipartite network of cities linked to economic activities. Analysing the structure of this network, we find striking similarities with nested networks observed in ecology, where links represent mutualistic interactions between species. This motivates us to apply ecological indicators to identify the unbalanced deployment of economic activities. Such deployment can lead to an over-representation of specific economic sectors in a given city, and poses a significant thread for the city's future especially in times when the over-represented activities face economic uncertainties. If we compare our analysis with external rankings about the quality of life in a city, we find that the nested structure of the city-firm network also reflects such information about the quality of life, which can usually be assessed only via dedicated survey-based indicators.

[1]  D. Pumain,et al.  An evolutionary theory for interpreting urban scaling laws Une théorie évolutive pour expliquer les lois d'échelle dans les systèmes de villes , 2006 .

[2]  Walter Isard,et al.  Location and Space-Economy: A General Theory Relating to Industrial Location, Market Areas, Land Use, Trade, and Urban Structure , 1956 .

[3]  Werner Ulrich,et al.  A consistent metric for nestedness analysis in ecological systems: reconciling concept and measurement , 2008 .

[4]  P. Krugman,et al.  First Nature, Second Nature, and Metropolitan Location , 1991 .

[5]  Jordi Bascompte,et al.  The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity , 2009, Nature.

[6]  Oc Herfindahl,et al.  Concentration in the US steel industry , 1950 .

[7]  Carlos J. Melián,et al.  The nested assembly of plant–animal mutualistic networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  D. Helbing,et al.  Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  B. Ohlin.  Interregional And International Trade Vol.xxxix , 1952 .

[10]  Serguei Saavedra,et al.  Strong contributors to network persistence are the most vulnerable to extinction , 2011, Nature.

[11]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The building blocks of economic complexity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Frank Schweitzer,et al.  The spatial component of R&D networks , 2015, Journal of Evolutionary Economics.

[13]  Rudolf P. Rohr,et al.  On the structural stability of mutualistic systems , 2014, Science.

[14]  Guido Caldarelli,et al.  A New Metrics for Countries' Fitness and Products' Complexity , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Colin Fontaine,et al.  Stability of Ecological Communities and the Architecture of Mutualistic and Trophic Networks , 2010, Science.

[16]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[17]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The Dynamics of Nestedness Predicts the Evolution of Industrial Ecosystems , 2012, PloS one.