Understanding diagnostic tests. Part 3.
暂无分享,去创建一个
1. Methods in Epidemiologic, Clinical, and Operations Research–MECOR–program, American Thoracic Society/Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax, Montevideo, Uruguay. 2. Divisão de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coração, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles (CA) USA. a. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6548-1384; b. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5742-2157 In the previous articles from this series(1,2) we discussed important characteristics used in order to evaluate diagnostic tests: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. In this final part, we discuss positive likelihood ratio (LR+), negative likelihood ratio (LR−), and ROC curves.
[1] J. Ferreira,et al. Understanding diagnostic tests. Part 2. , 2017, Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia.
[2] J. Ferreira,et al. Understanding diagnostic tests. Part 2. , 2017, Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia.
[3] D G Altman,et al. Statistics Notes: Diagnostic tests 3: receiver operating characteristic plots , 1994, BMJ.
[4] J. Rice. Understanding diagnostic tests. , 1991, Nursing.